Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
EMF Compare
PresentationThe EMF Compare project is part of EMFT (EMF Technology). EMF Compare brings model comparison to the EMF framework, this tool provides generic support for any kind of metamodel in order to compare and merge models. The objectives of this component are to provide a stable and efficient generic implementation of model comparison and to provide an extensible framework for specific needs.
|
CompatibilityThe EMF Compare development team does its best to maintain downward compatibility towards Europa (3.3). Following is the compatibility chart :
An empty cell indicates that the compatibility hasn't been tested for a particular combination. Documentation
User GuideDeveloper Guide
FAQ |
Roadmap & HistoryRoadmap1.0.0 - Eclipse 3.5- patch/changeset model - huge model management - UI extensibility (filters..) - Graphical modelers integration - Remote proxy resolving - Incubation status exit - ResourceSet match (inter-models links) - eOperations handling 0.8.0 - Ganymede (2008)- « 3 way » comparison - confirm RCP/Domain uses cases for diff/synchronization - diff engine extensibility - diff model extension - performances enhancements - tutorials/documentation History0.7.0 branch (2007)- merge/differencing - reference documentation - « 2 way » comparison - Ecore/XMI Id handling - metamodel agnostic - match engine extensibility - export API |
Current Tasks
|
TeamThe project developers are: Cedric Brun (Obeo), project lead Laurent Goubet (Obeo) Jonathan Musset (Obeo) Antoine Toulme (Intalio Inc.) |
ContactsAny issue should be reported to the Bugzilla You may also contact the team using the EMFT newsgroup. |
Events20/03/2008 - Short talk given at EclipseCon 2008 An update on EMF Compare 10/10/2007 - Talk given at Eclipse Summit Europe 2007 EMF Compare : One year later. 05/03/2007 - We presented the project at EclipseCon through a panel. Here is some feedback: Model Comparison Panel 2007. |