Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "CDT/summitfall2007/minutes"
< CDT | summitfall2007
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{warning|Note: The contents of this page refer to a past CDT summit. For information on other and possible upcoming summits visit [[CDT/summits]]}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:CDT:Summits]] | ||
+ | |||
Here are some minutes that Doug collected over the week. Feel free to add or correct. | Here are some minutes that Doug collected over the week. Feel free to add or correct. | ||
* Ganymede plan | * Ganymede plan | ||
Line 23: | Line 28: | ||
* Should we move to subversion? | * Should we move to subversion? | ||
** No compelling reason, plug-ins not mature yet | ** No compelling reason, plug-ins not mature yet | ||
− | ** So, the answer is not now. | + | ** So, the answer is not now, but we will keep an eye on it for the future. |
* API Management | * API Management | ||
** Provisional APIs | ** Provisional APIs |
Latest revision as of 16:11, 17 January 2020
Here are some minutes that Doug collected over the week. Feel free to add or correct.
- Ganymede plan
- Ganymede will be CDT 5.0
- Intent to define CDT APIs
- Some many need to be changed to be good APIs
- Likely need one more round before freezing (i.e. CDT 6.0)
- Switch the default gdb integration to DSF GDM/MI
- Make it available as an optional feature (Pawel)
- Make the CDI/MI optional feature (Doug)
- Revisit in January which one to include in default CDT packages.
- Needs to be as functional and good quality by Ganymede.
- Make DSF co-resident in CDT (Mikhail K and Pawel)
- With a clean UI
- GNU toolchain integration in a optional feature (Doug)
- At least in the UI (still lots of deep hooks in the core for gcc/gdb)
- Specify which supported toolchains/platforms (Doug)
- What to do with the bugs
- Find a way to mark it as an unsupported bug without shutting the door
- New keyword? Move to enhancement or WONTFIX
- What to do with the bugs
- Extension point for breakpoint creation (Pawel)
- To support non CDT breakpoints on C Resources
- Better way to hook up debuggers to toolchains (Doug & Mikhail S)
- Should we move to subversion?
- No compelling reason, plug-ins not mature yet
- So, the answer is not now, but we will keep an eye on it for the future.
- API Management
- Provisional APIs
- Visible in packages
- Move internal to internal
- Deprecate non API in public packages
- Document – API contract
- APIs Guidelines – Jeem