1.3 you state that most, if not all seem necessary? Actually you call out many that do not apply to RT later
What about 1.4.9 APIs
RT Panel
Who is the moderator?
Someone from the foundation (Ian? or Mike?)
Ian Bull will take a first crack at the abstract
LTS Readiness
Virgo did a lot of work to get on Juno release
driver for it was to be eligible for LTS
it was a lot of effort, is it really necessary for LTS?
A large number of the requirements required to participate in the common yearly release do not seem applicable to RT. simultaneous release requirements
The PMC discussed this item a bit. We agree that it has value, but need clarification on some of the musts. For example, the must for having bugzilla entries for each deviation.
Ian to take action item to planning council to get some clarification.
The PMC discussed this item a bit. If this only applies to policies for p2 repositories then it does not apply to RT for LTS. If it applies to source repositories or repositories of binaries (p2, maven etc) in a reproducible build then it seems like a good idea for RT.