Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "EclipseCon Selection Guidelines"
(→Selection Criteria) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{Backlink|EclipseCon | + | {{Backlink|EclipseCon 2009}} |
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
The EclipseCon conference committee is committed to putting on the best EclipseCon ever. The most important feature of EclipseCon is the presentations. Typically there are far more quality presentations than there are slots. This section of the wiki is dedicated to establishing common guidelines that will be used by the program committee members to evaluate and select presentation proposals. | The EclipseCon conference committee is committed to putting on the best EclipseCon ever. The most important feature of EclipseCon is the presentations. Typically there are far more quality presentations than there are slots. This section of the wiki is dedicated to establishing common guidelines that will be used by the program committee members to evaluate and select presentation proposals. | ||
| − | + | =Selection Criteria= | |
| − | + | ==Quality== | |
| − | + | *'''Title''': Catchy, Short, and Descriptive | |
| − | + | *'''Abstract''': Does the abstract | |
| − | ** | + | ** describe the talk |
| − | ** | + | ** identify audience take aways |
| − | + | ** explain the importance of the talk | |
| − | + | ** provide an outline | |
| − | ** | + | *'''Difficulty''': Does the abstract match the difficulty assignment? |
| − | + | *'''Speaker''': Is this speaker qualified | |
| − | + | ** Biography - if they can't take the time to create a good bio, what does that say?) | |
| − | ** | + | ** Experience - Speakers will be asked to describe their speaking experience in the comments. |
| − | ** | + | *** Category reps should prompt for experience if none is provided |
| − | *** | + | ** EclipseCon 2008 Reviews - The PC can review last years evaluations and comments |
| − | ** | + | |
| − | + | ==Feedback== | |
| − | + | * '''Community Feedback''': As represented in the comments. | |
| − | + | * '''Presenter Response''': Is the presenter willing to amend their presentation based on community feedback? | |
| − | + | ==Program Balance== | |
Each category has been allocated a specific number of talks. The category representative (see EclipseCon Program Committee) will review all entries for their category and work with the submitters to accept the talks that best meet the objectives of the category. This will include looking at: | Each category has been allocated a specific number of talks. The category representative (see EclipseCon Program Committee) will review all entries for their category and work with the submitters to accept the talks that best meet the objectives of the category. This will include looking at: | ||
| − | + | * '''Difficulty''': a mix of easy to expert | |
| − | + | * '''Category Coverage''': representation from the projects within the category | |
| − | + | * '''Community Diversity''': a diversity of voices is a goal | |
| − | + | ==Open Source== | |
Eclipse is an Open Source community. EclipseCon is not exclusively open source, but those talks that embrace an open philosophy will be given preference over closed talks. This includes | Eclipse is an Open Source community. EclipseCon is not exclusively open source, but those talks that embrace an open philosophy will be given preference over closed talks. This includes | ||
| − | + | * '''Source Available''': Will the attendee be able to download your slides and samples? | |
| − | + | * '''Eclipse Technology''': Presentations on Eclipse technology are preferred. | |
| − | + | * '''Open Source''': Presentations on Open Source technology that interact with Eclipse are better. | |
| − | + | * '''Commercial Eclipse''': Commercial products that are Eclipse focused are good, but face more scrutiny to ensure they are good technical talks and not just marketing pitches. | |
| − | + | * '''Commercial Non Eclipse''': Not appropriate for EclipseCon. | |
| + | * '''Sales Pitches''': Should be directed to [mailto:exhibitors09@eclipse.org exhibitors] | ||
| − | + | ==Saying No== | |
Unfortunately, we can't say yes to everyone. The category reps have agreed that they will try to work with each submission to make it acceptable. This may include: | Unfortunately, we can't say yes to everyone. The category reps have agreed that they will try to work with each submission to make it acceptable. This may include: | ||
| − | + | * Modifying your submission | |
| − | + | * Combining your submission with a similar presentation | |
| − | + | * Shortening your submission | |
Even with these measures we may still need to say no. The program committee will strive to make sure that anyone that has taken the time to submit a talk will at least understand why their talk has not been accepted. | Even with these measures we may still need to say no. The program committee will strive to make sure that anyone that has taken the time to submit a talk will at least understand why their talk has not been accepted. | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category: EclipseCon]] |
Latest revision as of 13:30, 17 October 2008
< To: EclipseCon 2009
Contents
Discussion
The EclipseCon conference committee is committed to putting on the best EclipseCon ever. The most important feature of EclipseCon is the presentations. Typically there are far more quality presentations than there are slots. This section of the wiki is dedicated to establishing common guidelines that will be used by the program committee members to evaluate and select presentation proposals.
Selection Criteria
Quality
- Title: Catchy, Short, and Descriptive
- Abstract: Does the abstract
- describe the talk
- identify audience take aways
- explain the importance of the talk
- provide an outline
- Difficulty: Does the abstract match the difficulty assignment?
- Speaker: Is this speaker qualified
- Biography - if they can't take the time to create a good bio, what does that say?)
- Experience - Speakers will be asked to describe their speaking experience in the comments.
- Category reps should prompt for experience if none is provided
- EclipseCon 2008 Reviews - The PC can review last years evaluations and comments
Feedback
- Community Feedback: As represented in the comments.
- Presenter Response: Is the presenter willing to amend their presentation based on community feedback?
Program Balance
Each category has been allocated a specific number of talks. The category representative (see EclipseCon Program Committee) will review all entries for their category and work with the submitters to accept the talks that best meet the objectives of the category. This will include looking at:
- Difficulty: a mix of easy to expert
- Category Coverage: representation from the projects within the category
- Community Diversity: a diversity of voices is a goal
Open Source
Eclipse is an Open Source community. EclipseCon is not exclusively open source, but those talks that embrace an open philosophy will be given preference over closed talks. This includes
- Source Available: Will the attendee be able to download your slides and samples?
- Eclipse Technology: Presentations on Eclipse technology are preferred.
- Open Source: Presentations on Open Source technology that interact with Eclipse are better.
- Commercial Eclipse: Commercial products that are Eclipse focused are good, but face more scrutiny to ensure they are good technical talks and not just marketing pitches.
- Commercial Non Eclipse: Not appropriate for EclipseCon.
- Sales Pitches: Should be directed to exhibitors
Saying No
Unfortunately, we can't say yes to everyone. The category reps have agreed that they will try to work with each submission to make it acceptable. This may include:
- Modifying your submission
- Combining your submission with a similar presentation
- Shortening your submission
Even with these measures we may still need to say no. The program committee will strive to make sure that anyone that has taken the time to submit a talk will at least understand why their talk has not been accepted.