Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Build Enhancements"

(List of current enhancement candidates)
(List of current enhancement candidates)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
* ''These initial candidate ideas were provided by Jim Sermersheim''
 
* ''These initial candidate ideas were provided by Jim Sermersheim''
  
** No regeneration of build.xml after changing a project's dependencies. Each project's build should ideally do whatever it takes to work before and after changes to that project's dependency list.
+
* No regeneration of build.xml after changing a project's dependencies. Each project's build should ideally do whatever it takes to work before and after changes to that project's dependency list.
  
** Dependencies are versioned.  We should be able at worst to cause a build to use a specified CVS tag for all dependencies, and ideally, we should be able to specify a cvs tag for each dependency.
+
* Dependencies are versioned.  We should be able at worst to cause a build to use a specified CVS tag for all dependencies, and ideally, we should be able to specify a cvs tag for each dependency.
  
** Single place for dependencies.  Right now, we've decided to list them in manifest.mf.  Because this file doesn't allow us to control its contents, we're restricted from doing things like #2 above.  Moreover, it sounds like build.properties must also in some cases be updated with dependencies when there's a need to differentiate between build libs and runtime libs.  I think we should be updating our own dependencies.xml file, and that should be used to auto-gen, or update the manifest.mf as appropriate.
+
* Single place for dependencies.  Right now, we've decided to list them in manifest.mf.  Because this file doesn't allow us to control its contents, we're restricted from doing things like #2 above.  Moreover, it sounds like build.properties must also in some cases be updated with dependencies when there's a need to differentiate between build libs and runtime libs.  I think we should be updating our own dependencies.xml file, and that should be used to auto-gen, or update the manifest.mf as appropriate.
  
** Any automated process should mirror manual processes.  If I pull down a project into a fresh work area and run it's build (which  automates the process of gathering dependencies), the result should look the same as if I had manually gathered all those dependencies.  Also, the fetched dependencies should remain in place and be usable at a later time.
+
* Any automated process should mirror manual processes.  If I pull down a project into a fresh work area and run it's build (which  automates the process of gathering dependencies), the result should look the same as if I had manually gathered all those dependencies.  Also, the fetched dependencies should remain in place and be usable at a later time.

Revision as of 19:52, 22 October 2007

List of current enhancement candidates

  • These initial candidate ideas were provided by Jim Sermersheim
  • No regeneration of build.xml after changing a project's dependencies. Each project's build should ideally do whatever it takes to work before and after changes to that project's dependency list.
  • Dependencies are versioned. We should be able at worst to cause a build to use a specified CVS tag for all dependencies, and ideally, we should be able to specify a cvs tag for each dependency.
  • Single place for dependencies. Right now, we've decided to list them in manifest.mf. Because this file doesn't allow us to control its contents, we're restricted from doing things like #2 above. Moreover, it sounds like build.properties must also in some cases be updated with dependencies when there's a need to differentiate between build libs and runtime libs. I think we should be updating our own dependencies.xml file, and that should be used to auto-gen, or update the manifest.mf as appropriate.
  • Any automated process should mirror manual processes. If I pull down a project into a fresh work area and run it's build (which automates the process of gathering dependencies), the result should look the same as if I had manually gathered all those dependencies. Also, the fetched dependencies should remain in place and be usable at a later time.

Back to the top