Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Architecture Council/F2F SFO 2008"
(New page: = Tentative Agenda for an AC Face-to-face meeting at SFO Board Meeting 2008 = == Participants == * '''Participants''' * '''Tentative''' ** Doug Gaff, Wind River -- arrive TBD -- depart T...) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
− | Open discussion here. Feel free to add anything | + | Open discussion here. Feel free to add anything (this is not yet an agenda), prefix with your name. |
− | * (MartinO) | + | * (MartinO) I don't know how these Board Meetings operate, but I'd assume that only AC members who are also on the Board would be present. |
+ | ** As such, I'll leave it to others to determine if such a meeting even makes sense, or what would be a good time slot. | ||
+ | ** Talking about IP/Legal things might be interesting since the IP Advisory committee may also be present and having such a discussion aside the full Board plenary might be helpful. |
Revision as of 09:39, 22 October 2008
Contents
Tentative Agenda for an AC Face-to-face meeting at SFO Board Meeting 2008
Participants
- Participants
- Tentative
- Doug Gaff, Wind River -- arrive TBD -- depart TBD -- hotel TBD
- Ed Merks, Macro Modeling -- arrive TBD -- depart TBD -- hotel TBD
- Bjorn Freeman-Benson, EMO -- arrive TBD -- depart TBD -- hotel TBD
- Mike Milinkovich, EMO -- arrive TBD -- depart TBD -- hotel TBD
- Regrets
- Martin Oberhuber
Date, Time and Location
- TBA, likely evening at some meeting room with dinner/bar afterwards
Discussion
Open discussion here. Feel free to add anything (this is not yet an agenda), prefix with your name.
- (MartinO) I don't know how these Board Meetings operate, but I'd assume that only AC members who are also on the Board would be present.
- As such, I'll leave it to others to determine if such a meeting even makes sense, or what would be a good time slot.
- Talking about IP/Legal things might be interesting since the IP Advisory committee may also be present and having such a discussion aside the full Board plenary might be helpful.