Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Planning Council/August 7 2013"
(→Progress on Action Items) |
(→Members and Attendees) |
||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Stephan Merker | + | | Stephan Merker |
| SAP AG (Strategic Developer) | | SAP AG (Strategic Developer) | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 02:50, 7 August 2013
Contents
Logistics
Meeting Title: | Planning Council Conference Call |
Date & Time: | Wednesday, August 07, 2013, at 1200 Noon Eastern |
Dial in: | (See Asterisk service for complete details on SIP, potential new numbers, phone mute commands, etc.)
Phone Numbers: (Check Asterisk/Numbers for more or current phone numbers.)
|
Members and Attendees
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: "Inactive" refers to Strategic Members or PMCs we have not heard from for a while, and have been unable to convince to participate. Those members can become active again at any time. Contact David Williams if questions.
Note: feel free to correct any errors/omissions in above attendance record.
Y = Yes, attended
N = No, did not
R = regrets sent ahead of time
D = delegated
X = not expected
Announcements
- New Member: Dani Megert is now the Eclipse PMC representative to the Planning Council. Thanks to John for years of service. Thanks Dani for volunteering to take his place.
Kepler Retrospective
- Propose to start in August, finish in September
Luna Planning
- Is there confusion/contradictions about "unreleased components in Sim. Rel. repo"? See bug 411977.
- Are we "too lax" in versioning requirements? Especially for "maintenance"? See cross-project list posting. [To be honest, I do not recall what specific situation this is about?]
- I have started scheduling Luna milestones. I think first 4 or 5 will be similar to previous years.
- * Appears that timing of EclipseCon in 2014 may effect how M6 is scheduled. It comes "the last week" of what would
normally be M6, instead of M6 finishing first.
- Can/should Planning Council say projects "should" contribute source to common repo? Or continue to "leave it up to projects" to decide?
- See thread around http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg09506.html
- Possibly bug 414262
- [Remember, we should make this decision based on principle, not the one request for an "Ultimate Package", since a) we should always work on principles!, and b) this package may or may not come to fruition.]
- Discuss more frequent "(un?) coordinated releases" or updates to common repo or updates to EPP packages. (Doug, Ian).
- See Ian's summary at http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-planning-council/msg02168.html.
- For some fun reading, I looked up the original bug on how we got to "SR1/SR2" .. bug 227767
- Doug also wants to discuss him taking over the "releng role" and do aggregation builds using Maven/Tycho.
- The focus is still on projects providing OSGi bundles in p2 repos, right? No matter what technology they used to get there?
- What type of "input" is required?
- What type of "testing" is done that all is well formed and can be installed together and is repeatable?
- In particular, how are "IDE" vs "runtime only" components treated separately?
- What are concrete advantages?
Progress on Action Items
- Editing of "Requirements Document"? (Dani and Neil)
- GSoC project for "Development Channel"? (Wayne)
- Improved "aggregator examples/doc". (dw -- no progress).
Next Meeting
- September 4, 2013 - Regular First Wednesday Meeting
Reference
- EclipseCon face-to-face follow-through action items. For original meeting notes, see Planning_Council/March_24_2013 and for discussion leading to action items, see Planning_Council/April_10_2013. For last status update, see Planning_Council/May_8_2013.