Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Orbit Minutes 070313"
(→Consuming Orbit Bundles) |
|||
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | * Call convened at [http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=03&day=13&year=2007&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=188 1100 | + | * Call convened at [http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=03&day=13&year=2007&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=188 1100 EDT] |
* Call-in: '''613.287.8000''' or '''866.362.7064''', passcode '''892048#''' | * Call-in: '''613.287.8000''' or '''866.362.7064''', passcode '''892048#''' | ||
* Previous Meeting: [[Orbit Minutes 070227]] | * Previous Meeting: [[Orbit Minutes 070227]] | ||
== Attendees == | == Attendees == | ||
− | * | + | * Christian Damus |
+ | * Martin Oberhuber | ||
+ | * Thomas Watson | ||
+ | * Jeff McAffer | ||
+ | * Kim Moir | ||
+ | * DJ Houghton | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
====IP Log info==== | ====IP Log info==== | ||
Pascal to work on a document describing the format and requirements. Jeff to review. | Pascal to work on a document describing the format and requirements. Jeff to review. | ||
+ | * Initial draft done. Awaiting review before released to dev list for comments. | ||
+ | * <font color="red">Action: Jeff to review doc.</font> | ||
+ | * <font color="red">Action: DJ to send to dev list for comments.</font> | ||
====Consuming Orbit Bundles==== | ====Consuming Orbit Bundles==== | ||
Kim to work on doc "How to consume Orbit". | Kim to work on doc "How to consume Orbit". | ||
+ | * <font color="red">Action: Kim to create a wiki page</font> | ||
+ | Done - see [[http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Easy_Bake_Builds_with_Orbit_Bundles | Consuming Orbit bundles in your builds]] and note sent to cross-project-issues list. | ||
+ | * <font color="red">Action: DJ to talk to Pascal, can generated Orbit maps always specify a version number?</font> <font color="blue">Created [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=177427 bug 177427]</font>. | ||
====Update features and map files==== | ====Update features and map files==== | ||
− | David to update the Orbit build process and try multi-versions in the map files. If everything works out he will combine the map and feature files. | + | David to update the Orbit build process and try multi-versions in the map files. If everything works out he will combine the map and feature files. Note: Does this mean we are down to 1 feature.xml and 1 map file now? |
+ | * Looks like we are close (need update from David) | ||
+ | * Features can handle multiple versions of the same bundle. | ||
+ | * Are there problems with PDE/Build when building multiple versions of the same bundle when it is a singleton? | ||
+ | * Tom says there is a dev flag for the State to allow for multiple versions of singleton plug-ins to resolve at the same time. | ||
+ | * Also allows for bundles to be resolved against non-resolved dependent bundles. | ||
+ | * <font color="red">Action: DJ to talk to Pascal and confirm there are no problems.</font> <font color="blue">Created [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=177425 bug 177425]</font> | ||
====Xerces==== | ====Xerces==== | ||
There are some open issues with the Xerces bundle around splitting the API bundle into mutliple JARs. | There are some open issues with the Xerces bundle around splitting the API bundle into mutliple JARs. | ||
+ | * Need to get status from David | ||
===Other discussion topics=== | ===Other discussion topics=== | ||
Line 26: | Line 44: | ||
====Orbit Milestone==== | ====Orbit Milestone==== | ||
The Platform M6 milestone is March 23 and the Orbit milestone is n-1 so its this week. Are there any remaining issues to address before we graduate a build? | The Platform M6 milestone is March 23 and the Orbit milestone is n-1 so its this week. Are there any remaining issues to address before we graduate a build? | ||
+ | * org.apache.commons.net to have minor changes this week | ||
+ | * <font color="red">Action: DJ to send note to dev list</font> - <font color="blue">(David already [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/orbit-dev/msg00229.html beat me to it])</font> | ||
+ | * Signing - Do we need legal approval for signing? | ||
+ | * <font color="red">Action: Jeff to confirm or deny</font> - <font color="blue">No we don't need approval.</font> | ||
+ | * Members of Orbit should start reviewing other members' bundles for form, etc. | ||
+ | ** <font color="blue">MartinO: done for [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=60905 this team project set] - logged problems in [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=177513 bug 177513] for commons.codec, commons.httpclient, commons.logging | ||
+ | and junit</font> | ||
====Qualifiers==== | ====Qualifiers==== | ||
− | Some pre-built bundles (like ICU 3.4.5) have exact versions in the manifest. Since they are pre-built should we leave them as-is or should we be adding ".qualifier" to the bundle version? | + | Some pre-built bundles (like ICU 3.4.5) have exact versions in the manifest. Since they are pre-built should we leave them as-is or should we be adding ".qualifier" to the bundle version? Also, if we don't add the qualifier, then we should remove the ".qualifier" from the version in the feature.xml file. |
+ | * As soon as we modify anything in the bundle, then we should take that opportunity to add a qualifier to the bundle version if its missing. | ||
+ | * Signing doesn't count. | ||
+ | * Should we re-sign if already signed? Yes...goal is to say "this is the one we got from Eclipse". | ||
==Next Meeting== | ==Next Meeting== | ||
− | * | + | * [http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=04&day=3&year=2007&hour=11&min=0&sec=0&p1=188 Apr 3, 2007 at 1100 EDT], Agenda: [[Orbit Minutes 070403]] |
[[Category:Orbit]] | [[Category:Orbit]] | ||
[[Category:Orbit/Meeting]] | [[Category:Orbit/Meeting]] | ||
[[Category:Meeting]] | [[Category:Meeting]] |
Latest revision as of 09:15, 3 April 2007
- Call convened at 1100 EDT
- Call-in: 613.287.8000 or 866.362.7064, passcode 892048#
- Previous Meeting: Orbit Minutes 070227
Contents
Attendees
- Christian Damus
- Martin Oberhuber
- Thomas Watson
- Jeff McAffer
- Kim Moir
- DJ Houghton
Discussion
Review action items from last call
IP Log info
Pascal to work on a document describing the format and requirements. Jeff to review.
- Initial draft done. Awaiting review before released to dev list for comments.
- Action: Jeff to review doc.
- Action: DJ to send to dev list for comments.
Consuming Orbit Bundles
Kim to work on doc "How to consume Orbit".
- Action: Kim to create a wiki page
Done - see [| Consuming Orbit bundles in your builds] and note sent to cross-project-issues list.
- Action: DJ to talk to Pascal, can generated Orbit maps always specify a version number? Created bug 177427.
Update features and map files
David to update the Orbit build process and try multi-versions in the map files. If everything works out he will combine the map and feature files. Note: Does this mean we are down to 1 feature.xml and 1 map file now?
- Looks like we are close (need update from David)
- Features can handle multiple versions of the same bundle.
- Are there problems with PDE/Build when building multiple versions of the same bundle when it is a singleton?
- Tom says there is a dev flag for the State to allow for multiple versions of singleton plug-ins to resolve at the same time.
- Also allows for bundles to be resolved against non-resolved dependent bundles.
- Action: DJ to talk to Pascal and confirm there are no problems. Created bug 177425
Xerces
There are some open issues with the Xerces bundle around splitting the API bundle into mutliple JARs.
- Need to get status from David
Other discussion topics
Orbit Milestone
The Platform M6 milestone is March 23 and the Orbit milestone is n-1 so its this week. Are there any remaining issues to address before we graduate a build?
- org.apache.commons.net to have minor changes this week
- Action: DJ to send note to dev list - (David already beat me to it)
- Signing - Do we need legal approval for signing?
- Action: Jeff to confirm or deny - No we don't need approval.
- Members of Orbit should start reviewing other members' bundles for form, etc.
- MartinO: done for this team project set - logged problems in bug 177513 for commons.codec, commons.httpclient, commons.logging
and junit
Qualifiers
Some pre-built bundles (like ICU 3.4.5) have exact versions in the manifest. Since they are pre-built should we leave them as-is or should we be adding ".qualifier" to the bundle version? Also, if we don't add the qualifier, then we should remove the ".qualifier" from the version in the feature.xml file.
- As soon as we modify anything in the bundle, then we should take that opportunity to add a qualifier to the bundle version if its missing.
- Signing doesn't count.
- Should we re-sign if already signed? Yes...goal is to say "this is the one we got from Eclipse".