Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Equinox/Meeting Minutes/20091027"
< Equinox | Meeting Minutes
(→Minutes) |
(→Minutes) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
** No other planned fixes from other components | ** No other planned fixes from other components | ||
* Progress on retention policy. | * Progress on retention policy. | ||
− | ** Pascal has started the wiki at [ | + | ** Pascal has started the wiki at [[Repository retention policy]] |
** Jeff will take it forward and add more stuff and drive it to the RT / Eclipse PMCs | ** Jeff will take it forward and add more stuff and drive it to the RT / Eclipse PMCs | ||
* Extension registry and multiple locales | * Extension registry and multiple locales |
Latest revision as of 15:41, 27 October 2009
Agenda
- Helios M3 status
- Progress on retention policy.
- Extension registry and multiple locales bug 244468
- Jetty 7 http service and RFC 66 bug 292837
Attendees
- Tom
- DJ
- Andrew
- Pascal
- Simon
- John
Minutes
- M3 status
- p2 is done, most work is being done in the branch.
- Server side is done
- No other planned fixes from other components
- Progress on retention policy.
- Pascal has started the wiki at Repository retention policy
- Jeff will take it forward and add more stuff and drive it to the RT / Eclipse PMCs
- Extension registry and multiple locales
- Still need a review from John and Tom.
- Need to get EclipseSource to get involved.
- Jetty 7 http service
- They are using the equinox.servlet bundle.
- Where do we think the implementation should be housed?
- Equinox or in jetty.
- Thought is that it would be better to keep the technology close to the community of expertise instead of forcing it to be housed in Equinox.
- Our license
- Should we be dual license
- It would make it easier for others to consume us (e.g. Apache).
- It would open up the code to not force re-contribution (disadvantage).