Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Equinox/Meeting Minutes/20091027"
< Equinox | Meeting Minutes
(New page: == Agenda == * Progress on retention policy. * Extension registry and multiple locales * Jetty 7 http service and RFC 66 [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=292837 bug 292837] =...) |
(→Minutes) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
+ | * Helios M3 status | ||
* Progress on retention policy. | * Progress on retention policy. | ||
− | * Extension registry and multiple locales | + | * Extension registry and multiple locales [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=244468 bug 244468] |
* Jetty 7 http service and RFC 66 [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=292837 bug 292837] | * Jetty 7 http service and RFC 66 [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=292837 bug 292837] | ||
+ | |||
== Attendees == | == Attendees == | ||
− | + | * Tom | |
+ | * DJ | ||
+ | * Andrew | ||
+ | * Pascal | ||
+ | * Simon | ||
+ | * John | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
+ | * M3 status | ||
+ | ** p2 is done, most work is being done in the branch. | ||
+ | ** Server side is done | ||
+ | ** No other planned fixes from other components | ||
+ | * Progress on retention policy. | ||
+ | ** Pascal has started the wiki at [[Repository retention policy]] | ||
+ | ** Jeff will take it forward and add more stuff and drive it to the RT / Eclipse PMCs | ||
+ | * Extension registry and multiple locales | ||
+ | ** Still need a review from John and Tom. | ||
+ | ** Need to get EclipseSource to get involved. | ||
+ | * Jetty 7 http service | ||
+ | ** They are using the equinox.servlet bundle. | ||
+ | ** Where do we think the implementation should be housed? | ||
+ | *** Equinox or in jetty. | ||
+ | *** Thought is that it would be better to keep the technology close to the community of expertise instead of forcing it to be housed in Equinox. | ||
+ | * Our license | ||
+ | ** Should we be dual license | ||
+ | ** It would make it easier for others to consume us (e.g. Apache). | ||
+ | ** It would open up the code to not force re-contribution (disadvantage). |
Latest revision as of 15:41, 27 October 2009
Agenda
- Helios M3 status
- Progress on retention policy.
- Extension registry and multiple locales bug 244468
- Jetty 7 http service and RFC 66 bug 292837
Attendees
- Tom
- DJ
- Andrew
- Pascal
- Simon
- John
Minutes
- M3 status
- p2 is done, most work is being done in the branch.
- Server side is done
- No other planned fixes from other components
- Progress on retention policy.
- Pascal has started the wiki at Repository retention policy
- Jeff will take it forward and add more stuff and drive it to the RT / Eclipse PMCs
- Extension registry and multiple locales
- Still need a review from John and Tom.
- Need to get EclipseSource to get involved.
- Jetty 7 http service
- They are using the equinox.servlet bundle.
- Where do we think the implementation should be housed?
- Equinox or in jetty.
- Thought is that it would be better to keep the technology close to the community of expertise instead of forcing it to be housed in Equinox.
- Our license
- Should we be dual license
- It would make it easier for others to consume us (e.g. Apache).
- It would open up the code to not force re-contribution (disadvantage).