Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Equinox Minutes - 20090407"
(New page: == Attendees == == Agenda == When do we move to Java 1.5) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Attendees == | == Attendees == | ||
| + | * Jeff | ||
| + | * Tom | ||
| + | * John | ||
| + | * Simon | ||
| + | * Matt | ||
| + | * Andrew | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| − | When do we move to Java 1.5 | + | * When do we move to Java 1.5 |
| + | ** Third party libraries, jetty 7, slf4j etc. We hold some of them back. | ||
| + | ** Core Framework likely to stay 1.5 until OSGi spec moves | ||
| + | ** What about other bundles in Equinox. | ||
| + | ** When will there be a small 1.5 VM? We don't know at this point. | ||
| + | ** New features may require 1.5 for some reason. We should still be able to launch on pre 1.5 without the new feature and do the "right thing". | ||
| + | * Review Equinox SDK Features, next steps. | ||
| + | ** New Equinox SDK features checked into CVS. | ||
| + | ** Currently 4 features (core, p2, server-side, compendium) | ||
| + | ** What about executable feature, includes all launcher fragments and launcher exes. Part of the delta pack. We should keep it separate. Should nest it with the rest of the features. | ||
| + | ** What is next? | ||
| + | *** add to the build (Andrew? DJ? work with Kim). | ||
| + | *** review names | ||
| + | *** review the content | ||
| + | *** review the version (3.5 for top-level Equinox SDK feature). | ||
| + | *** bug 270694 discusses the SDK features. | ||
| + | * Galileo Categories for Runtime | ||
| + | ** We have decided to add each sdk feature in Equinox to the runtime category. | ||
| + | * Performance tests | ||
| + | ** Runtime headless performace tests | ||
| + | *** It is a known problem that the headless runtime performance test degrades over time because of new bundles, larger registry, etc. | ||
| + | *** However there was a clear and significant regression between N20090205 and I20090210 | ||
| + | *** The only significant change found so far is introduction of DS on N20090206, but initial testing doesn't show DS having such a significant impact | ||
Latest revision as of 15:14, 7 April 2009
Attendees
- Jeff
- Tom
- John
- Simon
- Matt
- Andrew
Agenda
- When do we move to Java 1.5
- Third party libraries, jetty 7, slf4j etc. We hold some of them back.
- Core Framework likely to stay 1.5 until OSGi spec moves
- What about other bundles in Equinox.
- When will there be a small 1.5 VM? We don't know at this point.
- New features may require 1.5 for some reason. We should still be able to launch on pre 1.5 without the new feature and do the "right thing".
- Review Equinox SDK Features, next steps.
- New Equinox SDK features checked into CVS.
- Currently 4 features (core, p2, server-side, compendium)
- What about executable feature, includes all launcher fragments and launcher exes. Part of the delta pack. We should keep it separate. Should nest it with the rest of the features.
- What is next?
- add to the build (Andrew? DJ? work with Kim).
- review names
- review the content
- review the version (3.5 for top-level Equinox SDK feature).
- bug 270694 discusses the SDK features.
- Galileo Categories for Runtime
- We have decided to add each sdk feature in Equinox to the runtime category.
- Performance tests
- Runtime headless performace tests
- It is a known problem that the headless runtime performance test degrades over time because of new bundles, larger registry, etc.
- However there was a clear and significant regression between N20090205 and I20090210
- The only significant change found so far is introduction of DS on N20090206, but initial testing doesn't show DS having such a significant impact
- Runtime headless performace tests