Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:EPIC Ad Copy"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Screen 1: The Official Eclipse plug-in Site | Screen 1: The Official Eclipse plug-in Site | ||
| + | |||
Screen 2: Free and Open to all | Screen 2: Free and Open to all | ||
| + | |||
Screen 3: Download over 600 Eclipse-based solutions | Screen 3: Download over 600 Eclipse-based solutions | ||
--[[User:Maher.genuitec.com|Maher.genuitec.com]] 13:04, 26 August 2006 (EDT) | --[[User:Maher.genuitec.com|Maher.genuitec.com]] 13:04, 26 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:04, 26 August 2006
My ranked order preference include
Add3, Add2, Add1, Add4
Add4 severely narrows the scope for an initial add. I would not necessarily rule it out in the long run to target key technologies, but can't help think it would be perceived as playing favoritism.
Add1 must be contingent on being able to fairly and randomly present all plugins listed at EPIC, or at least all member company listings
Putting on my marketing hat, Does the word "Discover" provide enough call to action to incent readers to click on the add? I know we don't provide downloads, but the word "Download" has a higher click through frequency in my experience.
Lastly, since the foundation is currently behind EPIC now, we should give the endorsement using phrases such as "The official Eclipse plugin site". I also would recommend using words such as "Open" and "Free"
So modifying Add4 might be as follow:
Screen 1: The Official Eclipse plug-in Site
Screen 2: Free and Open to all
Screen 3: Download over 600 Eclipse-based solutions
--Maher.genuitec.com 13:04, 26 August 2006 (EDT)