Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "RT/meetings/PMC Minutes 130123"
(New page: == Attendees == * == Agenda == * LTS readiness and simultaneous release - brief update) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Attendees == | == Attendees == | ||
| − | * | + | * Ian |
| + | * Markus ECF | ||
| + | * Markus | ||
| + | * Jesse | ||
| + | * Mike | ||
| + | * Glyn | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
* LTS readiness and simultaneous release - brief update | * LTS readiness and simultaneous release - brief update | ||
| + | * vert.x | ||
| + | * Panel | ||
| + | * Servlet bridge 348045 | ||
| + | |||
| + | == LTS readiness == | ||
| + | * Glyn asked the steering committee to explicitly accept Virgo into LTS | ||
| + | * Also asked to provide minutes to the decision | ||
| + | |||
| + | == vert.x == | ||
| + | * popular git hub project | ||
| + | * async web processing framework, similar to node, but written in Java and supports various other languages | ||
| + | * A proposal is to move it to Eclipse. Some discussion on the PMC it would come under. Seems RT would be a good fit | ||
| + | * Will it be OSGi enabled. Glyn did some initial investigation and made good progress that indicated it would fit nicely into OSGi. | ||
| + | * Ian looking to find where they are discussing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Panel == | ||
| + | * EclipseCon Panel | ||
| + | ** Topics | ||
| + | *** Technology vs RT PMCs? | ||
| + | *** Marketing around RT? | ||
| + | *** RT Release schedule? | ||
| + | *** Need for common repository for RT? | ||
| + | ** Who is on the Panel - Tom, Glyn, Gunnar?, Scott?, Markus or Ralf from RAP? Pascal or Ian? EclipseLink (Doug or Sean) | ||
| + | ** Ian to ask for a Moderator - David Carver? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == bug 348045 == | ||
| + | ** Some discussions around the removal of the servletbridge.extensionbundle. This bundle is causing grief to the community because its meta-data does not accurately reflect the packages it provides for javax.servlet. The current thinking is to stop building this bundle. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:38, 23 January 2013
Attendees
- Ian
- Markus ECF
- Markus
- Jesse
- Mike
- Glyn
Agenda
- LTS readiness and simultaneous release - brief update
- vert.x
- Panel
- Servlet bridge 348045
LTS readiness
- Glyn asked the steering committee to explicitly accept Virgo into LTS
- Also asked to provide minutes to the decision
vert.x
- popular git hub project
- async web processing framework, similar to node, but written in Java and supports various other languages
- A proposal is to move it to Eclipse. Some discussion on the PMC it would come under. Seems RT would be a good fit
- Will it be OSGi enabled. Glyn did some initial investigation and made good progress that indicated it would fit nicely into OSGi.
- Ian looking to find where they are discussing.
Panel
- EclipseCon Panel
- Topics
- Technology vs RT PMCs?
- Marketing around RT?
- RT Release schedule?
- Need for common repository for RT?
- Who is on the Panel - Tom, Glyn, Gunnar?, Scott?, Markus or Ralf from RAP? Pascal or Ian? EclipseLink (Doug or Sean)
- Ian to ask for a Moderator - David Carver?
- Topics
bug 348045
- Some discussions around the removal of the servletbridge.extensionbundle. This bundle is causing grief to the community because its meta-data does not accurately reflect the packages it provides for javax.servlet. The current thinking is to stop building this bundle.