Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Equinox Minutes - 20090106"
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
** updating to ECF 2.1 - p2 team wants to move. Tom bring this up in the Eclipse planning meeting | ** updating to ECF 2.1 - p2 team wants to move. Tom bring this up in the Eclipse planning meeting | ||
* 3.5 M5 | * 3.5 M5 | ||
| + | ** Tom put in Composite bundles | ||
| + | ** Sidenote: Need to look forward wrt the modularity of the framework implementation. Think about this in the e4 context. May line up well with the next version of OSGi spec (2.0) as well. Need help from the community. | ||
* UNC path support. Would like to revisit if we think we are worse off than 3.4. | * UNC path support. Would like to revisit if we think we are worse off than 3.4. | ||
| + | ** will look some more. Track bug 207103 | ||
* Are we still thinking of including DS in the SDK. | * Are we still thinking of including DS in the SDK. | ||
| + | ** Sure says John | ||
| + | ** | ||
* Incubator move | * Incubator move | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 6 January 2009
Attendees
- Jeff McAffer
- Tom Watson
- Pascal Rapicault
- John Arthorne
- DJ Houghton
- Andrew Niefer
- Oleg Besedin
- Simon Kaegi
Agenda
- 3.4.2
- UserAdmin bug makes the service basically unusable (need Chris A to review)
- ConfigAdmin bug. Tom needs to review
- Launcher bug. Andrew is much inspired by this problem but its unclear this is actually critical enough. Fixing for 3.5 is good.
- updating to ECF 2.1 - p2 team wants to move. Tom bring this up in the Eclipse planning meeting
- 3.5 M5
- Tom put in Composite bundles
- Sidenote: Need to look forward wrt the modularity of the framework implementation. Think about this in the e4 context. May line up well with the next version of OSGi spec (2.0) as well. Need help from the community.
- UNC path support. Would like to revisit if we think we are worse off than 3.4.
- will look some more. Track bug 207103
- Are we still thinking of including DS in the SDK.
- Sure says John
- Incubator move