Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "ECF Conference Call 12.21.2009"

(Attendees)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Attendees==
 
==Attendees==
  
*Scott Lewis  
+
*Scott Lewis, Markus Kuppe, Ted Kubaska
  
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
  
 
*Status report on remote services implementation [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=290446 bug 290446] -- Scott has nearly completed the work on the OSGi 4.2 remote services implementation.  This work requires some additions/changes to the ECF core (to support the config types and intents meta-data about providers/container types), so we now have to figure out how to get the changes for the core bundles into our own build (because we depend upon Eclipse as target platform for out build, so adding to our own core is problematic).
 
*Status report on remote services implementation [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=290446 bug 290446] -- Scott has nearly completed the work on the OSGi 4.2 remote services implementation.  This work requires some additions/changes to the ECF core (to support the config types and intents meta-data about providers/container types), so we now have to figure out how to get the changes for the core bundles into our own build (because we depend upon Eclipse as target platform for out build, so adding to our own core is problematic).

Revision as of 12:03, 21 December 2009

Attendees

  • Scott Lewis, Markus Kuppe, Ted Kubaska

Agenda

  • Status report on remote services implementation bug 290446 -- Scott has nearly completed the work on the OSGi 4.2 remote services implementation. This work requires some additions/changes to the ECF core (to support the config types and intents meta-data about providers/container types), so we now have to figure out how to get the changes for the core bundles into our own build (because we depend upon Eclipse as target platform for out build, so adding to our own core is problematic).

Back to the top