Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Cosmos Architecture Meeting 18-Oct-07"

(Update on user interface, esp. regarding boundary b/t DC and DV)
(Initial discussion / requirements on security (COSMOS Design 205658))
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
=== Initial discussion / requirements on security ([[COSMOS Design 205658]]) ===
 
=== Initial discussion / requirements on security ([[COSMOS Design 205658]]) ===
 +
 +
Some initial thoughts.... we need hooks so that we can add on w/out breaking.  Of course, this is a bit generic.
 +
 +
 +
It's possible that each MDR (and its contained data source) will have its own security mechanism.
 +
*Will we have to manage credentials for each MDR?
 +
*Do we need to simply encrypt the pipe?  What about authentication?
 +
 +
 +
Muse concerned about transport security and will encrypt the pipe with SSL. 
 +
Relies on WS-Security.  Can allow access based on the capability of the model.
 +
*One approach may be to use the security credentials that comes in the ws-security header.
 +
 +
 +
*Based on the Muse implementation, the target date for this would be I9.
  
 
=== Initial discussion of [[COSMOS_Programming_Model|programming model]] for data managers ===
 
=== Initial discussion of [[COSMOS_Programming_Model|programming model]] for data managers ===

Revision as of 12:28, 18 October 2007

Attendees

  • Ali Mehregani
  • Mark Weitzel
  • Bill Muldoon
  • Hubert Leuyng
  • Sheldon Leeloy
  • David Whiteman
  • Maosheng Liang
  • Jack Devine


Minutes

Update on user interface, esp. regarding boundary b/t DC and DV

  • Four new enhancements, include new broker view & MDR organization during meeting with Monica, Jack, Sheldon
  • Will also include a way to show the statistical report for non-MDR data sources. This will incorporate existing data stores
  • Generic XML viewer to facilitate MDRs that return "generic" XML
  • There will need to be some refactoring of the widgets that produce the XML binding logic (in data visualization services)
  • (Bill): Is there a relationship b/t the data manager and a view(s). This needs to be a loose coupling but could influence the programming model discussion.
    • Hubert will add this notion to the programming model discussion.

Initial discussion / requirements on security (COSMOS Design 205658)

Some initial thoughts.... we need hooks so that we can add on w/out breaking. Of course, this is a bit generic.


It's possible that each MDR (and its contained data source) will have its own security mechanism.

  • Will we have to manage credentials for each MDR?
  • Do we need to simply encrypt the pipe? What about authentication?


Muse concerned about transport security and will encrypt the pipe with SSL. Relies on WS-Security. Can allow access based on the capability of the model.

  • One approach may be to use the security credentials that comes in the ws-security header.


  • Based on the Muse implementation, the target date for this would be I9.

Initial discussion of programming model for data managers

Back to the top