Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Hudson-ci/community meetings/Mar202012"
(New page: {{hudson|pageTitle=Community Meeting 20-March-2012}} = Notes = Add or comment on agenda items here, just prefix the item with your name so we can identify you on the call: '''Dunca...) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''Duncan:''' Discussion Enhancement [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=374342 374342] This enhancement, based on some feedback on the Eclipse forum is to allow admins to separate out the contents of HUDSON_HOME into separate locations for configuration and data | '''Duncan:''' Discussion Enhancement [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=374342 374342] This enhancement, based on some feedback on the Eclipse forum is to allow admins to separate out the contents of HUDSON_HOME into separate locations for configuration and data | ||
| + | '''Henrik:''' What do people think of the idea of going to a more event driven | ||
| + | architecture and if people think it is a way to go, can we decide on | ||
| + | which of the two event handling proposals to go with (as described in | ||
| + | my mail to dev list)? | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 20 March 2012
| Hudson Continuous Integration Server | |
| Website | |
| Download | |
| Community | |
| Mailing List • Forums • IRC • mattermost | |
| Issues | |
| Open • Help Wanted • Bug Day | |
| Contribute | |
| Browse Source |
|
Community Meeting 20-March-2012 |
|---|
Notes
Add or comment on agenda items here, just prefix the item with your name so we can identify you on the call:
Duncan: Discussion Enhancement 374342 This enhancement, based on some feedback on the Eclipse forum is to allow admins to separate out the contents of HUDSON_HOME into separate locations for configuration and data Henrik: What do people think of the idea of going to a more event driven architecture and if people think it is a way to go, can we decide on which of the two event handling proposals to go with (as described in my mail to dev list)?