Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tigerstripe Buckminster Integration Tutorial"

(Overview)
(Overview)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
--[[User:Jistrawn.cisco.com|Jistrawn.cisco.com]] 14:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)<br>
 
--[[User:Jistrawn.cisco.com|Jistrawn.cisco.com]] 14:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)<br>
Is more needed here? Screen shots of Tigerstripe workbench Dependencies tab, etc? My thoughts are that a user would understand the reference mechanism before using buckminster for complex assembly. Am I being too stingy with my documentation :-)
+
Is more needed here? Screen shots of Tigerstripe workbench Dependencies tab, etc? My thoughts are that a user would understand the reference mechanism before using buckminster for complex assembly. Am I being too stingy with my documentation :-)<br>
 
--[[User:Jistrawn.cisco.com|Jistrawn.cisco.com]] 16:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)<br>
 
--[[User:Jistrawn.cisco.com|Jistrawn.cisco.com]] 16:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)<br>
 
Does diagram make sense? Verbiage to accompany, or remove? Trying to convey dependency tree.
 
Does diagram make sense? Verbiage to accompany, or remove? Trying to convey dependency tree.

Revision as of 12:52, 22 October 2008

Test

Overview

--Jistrawn.cisco.com 14:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Is more needed here? Screen shots of Tigerstripe workbench Dependencies tab, etc? My thoughts are that a user would understand the reference mechanism before using buckminster for complex assembly. Am I being too stingy with my documentation :-)
--Jistrawn.cisco.com 16:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Does diagram make sense? Verbiage to accompany, or remove? Trying to convey dependency tree.

Back to the top