Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:SMILA/Specifications/CompoundManagementDiscussion"
(New page: * on "Dependency to MimeTypeIdentifier": Sounds ok, just a side note: Don't put this into <tt>smila.utils</tt>. I think, <tt>utils</tt> should contain only very "technical" stuff (XML help...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | * on "Dependency to MimeTypeIdentifier": Sounds ok, just a side note: Don't put this into <tt>smila.utils</tt>. I think, <tt>utils</tt> should contain only very "technical" stuff (XML helpers, config readers, workspace handling, whatever), not "real" SMILA functionality. One more own bundle for this will not hurt. | + | * [[User:Juergen.schumacher.empolis.com|Juergen.schumacher.empolis.com]] on "Dependency to MimeTypeIdentifier": Sounds ok, just a side note: Don't put this into <tt>smila.utils</tt>. I think, <tt>utils</tt> should contain only very "technical" stuff (XML helpers, config readers, workspace handling, whatever), not "real" SMILA functionality. One more own bundle for this will not hurt. |
Latest revision as of 05:31, 28 May 2009
- Juergen.schumacher.empolis.com on "Dependency to MimeTypeIdentifier": Sounds ok, just a side note: Don't put this into smila.utils. I think, utils should contain only very "technical" stuff (XML helpers, config readers, workspace handling, whatever), not "real" SMILA functionality. One more own bundle for this will not hurt.