Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Papyrus/Neon Work Description/Discussions/Development rules"

Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
*PRES-18
 
*PRES-18
 +
Patrick: Interesting, but I do know if it can be applicable to papyrus: the code that has been generated  is greater than 2000 lines of code per files in some classes.
 +
 
* ARCH-12
 
* ARCH-12
 
  The string externalisation is already in place, but most of the string are not placed into a specific file: <code>messages.properties</code>.
 
  The string externalisation is already in place, but most of the string are not placed into a specific file: <code>messages.properties</code>.

Revision as of 05:35, 15 July 2015

Development Rules (Talk)

  • NAME-06

Patrick: according to me, the name must be understable. I dislike acronyms concatenations and abbreviations. An exception has been done for gmfdiag

  • NAME-22

Patrick: I have the same point of view as Cedric, for boolean variable I prefer a prefix with is

  • PRES-01

Patrick: I prefer not to be so strict in the structuration of the code. In IDE, now you can order properties, operations as you want (alphabetic...) Nevertheless: On remarks about inner class. I do like it. I someone add a ne inner class, it has to write a solid argumentation (if no a lot od developper will write the code in one files ;D )

  • PRES-18

Patrick: Interesting, but I do know if it can be applicable to papyrus: the code that has been generated is greater than 2000 lines of code per files in some classes.

  • ARCH-12
The string externalisation is already in place, but most of the string are not placed into a specific file: messages.properties.


I don't know if this could be done in Papyrus for the warnings, labels or other text messages.--Céline Janssens [ALL4TEC] (talk) 09:29, 9 July 2015 (EDT)

  • SONAR

Why not activate the sonar instance for our project?: https://wiki.eclipse.org/Sonar

Back to the top