Skip to main content

Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Papyrus/Neon Work Description/Discussions/Development rules"

Line 7: Line 7:
 
Patrick: I have the same point of view as Cedric, for boolean variable I prefer a prefix with ''is''
 
Patrick: I have the same point of view as Cedric, for boolean variable I prefer a prefix with ''is''
  
 +
globally for all presentation rules,  i think that is to strict.
 
*PRES-01
 
*PRES-01
 
Patrick: I prefer not to be so strict in the structuration of the code. In IDE, now you can order properties, operations as you want (alphabetic...)
 
Patrick: I prefer not to be so strict in the structuration of the code. In IDE, now you can order properties, operations as you want (alphabetic...)
Line 13: Line 14:
 
*PRES-18
 
*PRES-18
 
Patrick: Interesting, but I do know if it can be applicable to papyrus: the code that has been generated  is greater than 2000 lines of code per files in some classes.
 
Patrick: Interesting, but I do know if it can be applicable to papyrus: the code that has been generated  is greater than 2000 lines of code per files in some classes.
 +
 +
*PRES-10
 +
Patrick: 250 characters is better, screens are greaters than in the past.
 +
 +
*PRES-16
 +
Patrick: as Cedric I prefer in the same line
  
 
* ARCH-12
 
* ARCH-12

Revision as of 05:39, 15 July 2015

Development Rules (Talk)

  • NAME-06

Patrick: according to me, the name must be understable. I dislike acronyms concatenations and abbreviations. An exception has been done for gmfdiag

  • NAME-22

Patrick: I have the same point of view as Cedric, for boolean variable I prefer a prefix with is

globally for all presentation rules, i think that is to strict.

  • PRES-01

Patrick: I prefer not to be so strict in the structuration of the code. In IDE, now you can order properties, operations as you want (alphabetic...) Nevertheless: On remarks about inner class. I do like it. I someone add a ne inner class, it has to write a solid argumentation (if no a lot od developper will write the code in one files ;D )

  • PRES-18

Patrick: Interesting, but I do know if it can be applicable to papyrus: the code that has been generated is greater than 2000 lines of code per files in some classes.

  • PRES-10

Patrick: 250 characters is better, screens are greaters than in the past.

  • PRES-16

Patrick: as Cedric I prefer in the same line

  • ARCH-12
The string externalisation is already in place, but most of the string are not placed into a specific file: messages.properties.


I don't know if this could be done in Papyrus for the warnings, labels or other text messages.--Céline Janssens [ALL4TEC] (talk) 09:29, 9 July 2015 (EDT)

  • SONAR

Why not activate the sonar instance for our project?: https://wiki.eclipse.org/Sonar

Back to the top