Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Papyrus/CodeGenerationAndDeployment

< Talk:Papyrus
Revision as of 07:49, 19 January 2016 by Cedric.dumoulin.lifl.fr (Talk | contribs) (don't spray language in several layers; use one layer for each language.)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Can we express what are the requirements and what are our goals ?

For my point of view, I prefer to have all stuff related to a language under a layer dedicated to this language, rather than having it sprayed under different layers.

 There is several reasons : 
- When we will add new languages, we have only to add the corresponding layer
- Language will be more easily plug and play (like diagrams and other papyrus stuff)
- Language will be more independent one from the other. Common stuff can be put in a shared layers

So the proposal could be :

- language.common - all common stuff
-- language.common.xxx - one sublayers for each important category
- language.java  - all things related to java
-- language.java.generator
-- language.java.reverse
-- language.java.profile
-- language.java.xxx
- language.cpp - all things related to c++
-- language.cpp.generator
-- language.cpp.reverse
-- language.cpp.profile
-- language.cpp.xxx
- ...
 Cedric

Back to the top