|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Comment and suggestion on the line that says "Unlike the somewhat lax enforcement of previous years, the EMO will remove projects that do not meet the required constraints."
| |
| | | | |
| − | I suggest we build in a mechanism that allows for reasonable exceptions. This might help avoid being too cautious on saying what's "required". For example, "If projects do not meet the required constraints, they will be removed from the Ganymede release unless
| |
| − | :#The project file for an exception that is reviewed and approved or rejected by majority vote of the Planning Council.
| |
| − | :#The project has a plan for eventually rectifying the missing item by at least the next coordinated yearly release. (And, exceptions can not be granted two years in a row).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Just a thought [[User:David williams.us.ibm.com|David williams.us.ibm.com]] 01:56, 12 October 2007 (EDT)
| |
