Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
TPTP-PMC-20071205
Revision as of 16:19, 10 December 2007 by Paulslau.ca.ibm.com (Talk | contribs)
Contents
Attendees
- Present:
- Paul Slauenwhite
- Oliver Cole
- Alexander Alexeev
- Alex Nan
- Joanna Kubasta
- Alan Haggarty
- Guru Nagarajan
- Harm Sluiman
- Absent:
- Chris Elford - vacation
Previous Week
- No opposition to last week's meeting minutes.
Status of Last Week's Action Items
- AI: Project leads to send TPTP-InactiveCommitter-FormLetter to each inactive committer for their project see here for committer lists:
- Monitor: Outstanding.
- Test: Note has been sent. Wait for two weeks before removing inactive committers.
- Platform: Outstanding.
- Trace: Guru spoke to some Intel committers but there are more on the list to contact.
- AI: Project leads to review the Component reorganization WIKI
- Monitor: Outstanding.
- Test: Done.
- Platform: Outstanding.
- Trace: Outstanding.
- AI: Since the 4.5 Plan has been approved, project leads to update the priority (P1) and keyword (plan - if resources are available) for the enhancements.
- Monitor: Done.
- Test: Done.
- Platform: Done.
- Trace: Done.
- AI: Project leads to Revise the description for your project's planned enhancements in the 4.5 Plan. Note, related enhancements may be integrated into one row.
- Monitor: Outstanding.
- Test: Done.
- Platform: Outstanding.
- Trace: Outstanding.
- AI: Everyone to review the EclipseCon 2008 submissions and reply to my comments by replying to this message or directly to the submissions at EclipseCon site (->Category Test and Performance->Search).
- Only Chris replied to Paul's summaries.
- AI: For Guru, need testing overhead estimates for the 4 manual tests that are in Trace.
- Outstanding.
- AI: Leads to go read/comment on test automation documents
- Monitor: Outstanding.
- Test: Done.
- Platform: Outstanding.
- Trace: Outstanding.
- AI: Leads. Weekly milestones should reflect at the very least the targeted completion weeks for every targeted enhancement and defect.
- Monitor: Done.
- Test: Done.
- Platform: Done.
- Trace: Done.
- AI: Each lead needs to be especially aware of schedule given breaks and plan out how to accomplish test passes/etc.
- (note) Paul tried to make sure test pass 1 would happen before bulk of holidays hit.
- Monitor: Done.
- Test: Done.
- Platform: Done.
- Trace: Done.
Action Items
- Outstanding action items from last week to be addressed for next week.
- Guru/Alex A. and Alex N to close on ownership/management of BtM/Trace.Execution component (defects and features) under the trace project and notify the BtM committers so they can report status to Guru and attend the weekly Trace project call.
- Trace project (Guru/Alex A.) to update weekly schedule with cross dependences and weekly deliverables for the iteration.
4.5
- The 4.5 builds are broken due to the refactoring required for defect 200138.
- Alex is working with Joel on resolving the problems.
- Joel will announce the I4 TP1 candidate before EOD for committers to smoke their components in preparation for TP1.
- I4 TP1
- Guru has concerns about testing resources.
- There is sufficient overlap with the Platform Project components to handle the shortage.
- Alex A. will start attending the Platform Project weekly call.
- If we have a candidate before EOD for committers to smoke their components, can we start TP1 on Monday:
- Monitor: Yes.
- Test: Yes.
- Platform: Yes.
- Trace: Yes.
- Guru has concerns about testing resources.
Profiling
- Harm tried one of the profiling use cases and experienced several issues. He documented his concerns in a WIKI.
- We will not aggressively solicit lead users other than Harm until Harms issues/concerns are addressed.
- Due to constrained resources, may need to remove planned 4.5 defects and enhancements to contain this work.
Weekly Schedule
- Paul added a legend to marked slipped and completed deliverables.
- Has each project updated the schedule with their cross dependencies?:
- Monitor: Yes.
- Test: Yes.
- Platform: Yes.
- Trace: No.
- Has each project updated the schedule with their weekly deliverables and status?:
- Monitor: Yes.
- Test: Yes.
- Platform: Yes.
- Trace: No.
- Slippages:
- Monitor: Some have slipped (mostly defects) and have been marked slipped.
- Test: Some have slipped (mostly defects) and have been marked slipped. No concerns except EMMA (no time remaining in the I4 development cycle to prepare for using during TP1).
- Platform: No update.
- Trace: No update.