Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "TPTP-AG-20080414"

(Date)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
* Present:
 
* Present:
**
+
** Oliver Cole
 +
** Tony Wang
 +
** Mikhail Voronin
 +
** Joanna Kubasta
 +
** Joel Cayne
 +
** Eugene Chan
 +
** Chris Elford
  
 
== Topic ==
 
== Topic ==
Line 14: Line 20:
 
== Minutes ==
 
== Minutes ==
  
*
+
=== PoG ===
 +
 
 +
* Advocate/Lead:
 +
** One person leading the effort, which should be different from the Trace Project lead (e.g. Chris or Mikhail). 
 +
** Eugene would represent IBM to evaluate quality and review requirements. 
 +
 
 +
* Target Audience:
 +
** Eclipse Projects.
 +
** Eclipse Community.
 +
** WTP/TPTP EPP packaging:
 +
*** Joel will discuss the effort to package only the Trace components.
 +
*** How much extra testing? 
 +
**** Weekly smoke testing.
 +
**** Posting weekly/iteration test results.
 +
 
 +
* Existing defects:
 +
** JVM Issues:
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=207575 VerifyError during profiling of  project with AspectJ "set  pointcut"]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=218218 classes excluded from instrumentation in sake of profiler stability with IBM JVM 1.5 SR6]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=218146 Provide functionality of IBM's JVM identification at profilers JVM TI agent]
 +
 
 +
=== ToG ===
 +
 
 +
* Advocate/Lead:
 +
** One person leading the effort, which should be different from the Test Project lead.
 +
** Due to issues with staffing and skills, the lead will probably be the Test Project lead.
 +
 
 +
* Target Audience:
 +
** Stage 1:
 +
*** TPTP.
 +
*** COSMOS.
 +
** Stage 2:
 +
*** Eclipse Projects.
 +
*** Eclipse Community.
 +
 
 +
* Scenarios/Use Cases:
 +
** Unit testing of local and remote Java/Eclipse applications using the JUnit/JUnit Plug-in test types.
 +
** Performance testing of local and remote Web applications using the URL Recorder and URL test type.
 +
** Data-driven unit testing using datapools.
 +
** Test execution results viewing using the Test Log view.
 +
** Test report generation using the TPTP-BIRT integration.
 +
** Automated test execution and report generation using the Automatable Service Framework (ASF).
 +
 
 +
* Existing defects:
 +
** Platform Project:
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=222382 Execution of any testsuite fails using the IAC - InactiveProcessException]
 +
** Test Project:
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=222759 AGR Tests require absolute path to Equinox JAR]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=222760 Clear remote workspace launch does not work for remote test execution]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=222761 AGR Tests cannot be run with start ACServer]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=211476 Remove XMLUnit dependency and convert reporting tests to TPTP tests]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=215078 Content missing in Tabular Report]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=220390 Connection property does not deploy all dependencies]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=220391 Connection property does not allow JUnit Plug-in Tests to be executed]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=194503 ASF marshalling return value between service and client adapter does not have support for failures / exceptions]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=217487 Confusing exceptions when running automated services.]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=200194 ASF Test Execution Service races with AutoBuildJob -- can lead to unexpected test results]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=210289 ANT test results property requires trailing slash to specify location]
 +
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=210292 ANT importExistingProjects throws Exception]
 +
 
 +
* More information: [http://wiki.eclipse.org/4.5_Test_Automation_Initiative#Common_Test_Infrastructure 4.5 Test Automation Initiative: Common Test Infrastructure]
  
 
== Questions/Answers ==
 
== Questions/Answers ==

Revision as of 09:59, 14 April 2008

Date

  • April 14, 2008

Attendees

  • Present:
    • Oliver Cole
    • Tony Wang
    • Mikhail Voronin
    • Joanna Kubasta
    • Joel Cayne
    • Eugene Chan
    • Chris Elford

Topic

  • PoG and ToG

Minutes

PoG

  • Advocate/Lead:
    • One person leading the effort, which should be different from the Trace Project lead (e.g. Chris or Mikhail).
    • Eugene would represent IBM to evaluate quality and review requirements.
  • Target Audience:
    • Eclipse Projects.
    • Eclipse Community.
    • WTP/TPTP EPP packaging:
      • Joel will discuss the effort to package only the Trace components.
      • How much extra testing?
        • Weekly smoke testing.
        • Posting weekly/iteration test results.

ToG

  • Advocate/Lead:
    • One person leading the effort, which should be different from the Test Project lead.
    • Due to issues with staffing and skills, the lead will probably be the Test Project lead.
  • Target Audience:
    • Stage 1:
      • TPTP.
      • COSMOS.
    • Stage 2:
      • Eclipse Projects.
      • Eclipse Community.
  • Scenarios/Use Cases:
    • Unit testing of local and remote Java/Eclipse applications using the JUnit/JUnit Plug-in test types.
    • Performance testing of local and remote Web applications using the URL Recorder and URL test type.
    • Data-driven unit testing using datapools.
    • Test execution results viewing using the Test Log view.
    • Test report generation using the TPTP-BIRT integration.
    • Automated test execution and report generation using the Automatable Service Framework (ASF).

Questions/Answers

  • Q:
  • A:

Action Items

Back to the top