View source for Science WG/2016 Release

= Schedule =
* October 21, 2016: The Eclipse Science 2016 Release

= Summary =
''Based on [http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/science-iwg/msg01647.html March 16, 2016 email from Jay Jay Billings]''

At our [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JfLdOIDlE9rYudCjZ9TnumULWDQgQMaz5N-SAdVOUiw/edit March, 2016 Annual meeting in Reston], we decided that we would have a release of a subset of Science Working Group Projects.

The release will be called '''The Eclipse Science 2016 Release'''.  

This is similar to the the simultaneous release for Eclipse Eclipse.  Each participating project would release their work at the same time as a separate release.  Eventually, we might create a workbench that would combine projects, but that is out of scope for October, 2016.

This "release" will be a coordinated release in which all participating projects.  If possible, each participating project will release on Neon.

Todo items: 
# prepare a working version of their product that can be dubbed release X.Y.Z.
# complete all IP (See the [[IP_Stuff#Where_is_the_IP_Team_Work_Queue.3F | IP team's work queue]]), [https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews Release Review] and other Foundation requirements.
## On May 6, Sharon Corbett wrote and stated that the CQs for the following products likely be done in time: Ice - 2 CQs, Triquetrum - 10 CQs, EAVP - 1 CQ.  January has no CQs.  There was no mention of ChemClipse.
# all artifacts for participating projects are released at the individual project sites and through links at science.eclipse.org.
# do whatever else Wayne Beaton says we have to do. ;-)

== Participating projects ==

* Todo:
** Please add or remove your project here (in alphabetical order)
** Linking to Eclipse Wiki pages and GitHub or Bugzilla issues is preferred.
** Each project should consider 
*** determining a release name (0.1?) (See below)
*** Collecting up IP issues, perhaps in a GitHub or Bugzilla issue
*** When ready, asking for release review.

Having a project listed here is a commitment to consider the possibility of releasing at the same time.  Listing a project as part of the release need not be considered cast in stone.


* [https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.chemclipse ChemClipse] 
** [https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.chemclipse/releases/0.7.0 ChemClipse Release Version: 0.7.0] (''Release Questionnaire in progress, Release materials need to be completed?'') 
** 8/16/16: Philip Wenig wrote:
***  "I've prepared ChemClipse so far to be ready for the Science Fall or how we named it release :-). I'm ready to build and create an executable via Maven/Tycho. All necessary CQs are accepted"
*** Torkild replied that the release handbook is at https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#release
** ChemClipse IP, release review (Search https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/query.cgi for Component: technology.chemclipse):
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9723 ChemClipse] (approved)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9724 Apache Commons Math 3.5.0] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471077] (approved)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9725 ConcurrentLinkedHashMap 1.4.0] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471078] (approved)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9726 EJML 0.27.0] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471079] (approved)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9727 Javassist 3.19.0] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471080] (approved)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9728 jna-platform-4.1.0.jar Version: 4.1.0 (PB CQ 9292)] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471083] (approved)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9729 JSR305 1.3.9] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471084] (rejected)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9730 OrientDB 2.0.9] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471085] (approved)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9731 SWTChart 0.9.0 (PB CQ 8009)] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471086] (approved)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9732 SWTXYGraph 2.1.0] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471087] (withdrawn, became part of Eclipse)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9733 Snappy Java (Xerial) 1.1.16 *SUBSET*] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=471088] (approved)
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=484631 Maven repository for IP-approved libraries/artifacts]
*** [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=484633  Process for managing/providing IP-approved Maven artifacts]
** ChemClipse IP, other requirements:
*** Discuss how we can migrate our data import converters to Eclipse. Reading various data formats is essential for the ChemClipse project.
* [http://www.eclipse.org/eavp EAVP]
** EAVP Release Version: ''TBD'' 9/13/16: No [https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#release release questionnaire] yet on the [https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.eavp EAVP Project Page]
** According to 7/29/16 email from Jay, ICE will release against January.
** EAVP IP, release review and other requirements Search https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/query.cgi for Component: technology.eavp): 
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982 EAVP Initial Contribution] (approved)
* [[ICE]]
** ICE Release Version: ''TBD'' 9/13/16: No [https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#release release questionnaire] yet on the [https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.ice ICE Project Page]
** According to 7/29/16 email from Jay, ICE will release against January.
** ICE IP, release review and other requirements (Search https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/query.cgi for Component: technology.ice)
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9146 VisIt Java Client - Approved]
*** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10275 ICE Geometry Editor JavaFX conversion - Approved]
* [https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.january January]
** January Release Version: ''TBD'' 9/13/16: No [https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#release release questionnaire] yet on the [https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.january January Project Page]
** January IP, release review and other requirements (Search https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/query.cgi for Component: technology.january): ''TBD''
*** As of 8/9/16, the [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11665 initial contribution CQ (11665)] had been entered (and fixed) for January. 
*** 7/29/16 Email from Jonah, updated with IP CQ status:
**** "I need to submit piggyback for a few things for January, I am not sure whether some of these have global approvals already:"
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11787 #11787] ANTLR runtime (approved)
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11788 11788] <strike>Guava</strike> Guice (I think, com.google.inject package) (approved)
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11781 #11781] slf4j (approved)
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11789 #11789] Apache log4j (approved)
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11786 #11786] glazed lists (approved)
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11782 #11782] Apache Commons Lang Version: 3.1.0 (PB Orbit CQ6123) (approved)
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11783 #11783] Apache Commons Lang Version: 2.6 (PB Orbit CQ6450) (approved)
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11785 #11785] Apache Commons Math 3.5.0 (PB Orbit CQ10384)(approved)
***** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11784 #11784] Apache Commons Math Version: 2.1.0 (PB Orbit CQ4874) (approved)
***** <strike>Jama</strike> (Jay is not sure if this is in Orbit) (Jonah wrote: "Jama is only in the MANIFEST and the current code does not depend on it.")
**** Jonah wrote: "The rest are on orbit, but some are in the "new" orbit that does not have an official release yet, and therefore no retained builds. The orbit folk are hard at work on that at the moment: https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/listsN/orbit-dev/msg04524.html"
* [[Triquetrum]]
** Triquetrum Release Version: [https://github.com/eclipse/triquetrum/issues/71 GitHub #71: Triquetrum First Release: 21st October 2016], see [https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/technology.triquetrum/releases/0.1.0 Triquetrum 0.1.0 Release page] and [https://github.com/eclipse/triquetrum/issues/146 Bug #146: Create a new release record].
** [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10434 Triquetrum Initial Contribution CQ - Approved]
** Triquetrum IP: [https://github.com/eclipse/triquetrum/issues/70 GitHub #70: Triquetrum CQs]
** Triquetrum release review and other requirements: ''TBD''
** Jonah's work on integrating Python scripts from Java via XML-RPC has been submitted as [http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11664 CQ11664]
** the DRMAA group supports adding Java DRMAA API (v1 and v2) source bundles in Triquetrum (+ the impls we will migrate from DAWN&Passerelle for SGE and SLURM). Erwin would like to have that available with the release as well, but this still needs to be done.
** There are a couple of open issues that are still important to get implemented/resolved to have sufficient scope in the workflow editor. (especially related to hierarchical modeling)

= Release Versions =
Eclipse has guidelines about Release Version Naming:
* [https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#release Eclipse Project Handbook: Release]
* [[Version Numbering]]

= Releases and IP CQs =
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Incubation_Phase says:

"Interim Releases. Incubation Phase projects may make releases. All major and minor releases must go through a Release Review."

[https://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Release_Reviews Release Review] says:

"Intellectual Property"

"Before you can consider a Release Review, all of the relevant CQs must be approved by the Eclipse Legal team. We cannot schedule a Review before the Legal team has completed their work. If you are waiting for CQs, please review where your CQs are, and when they are scheduled to be reviewed, in the IP team work queue."


On March 21, 2016, Wayne Beaton described the release process for projects in incubation:

"Projects can do releases while in incubation."

"All CQs for code/libraries that are included in the release bits must be closed/approved by the IP Team prior to the release."

"In the time leading up to the release, you can and should distribute milestone builds that includes code/libraries that the IP team has granted checkin approval for. These are not official releases, and should be annotated as such (e.g. 0.7M2)."

"I recommend that the Science Working Group make a master list of all the open CQs that are required for the coordinated autumn release that we can present to the IP Team along with your last question. This should be a relatively easy query if we have a list of participating projects. Giving the IP Team a clear picture of what needs to be accomplished is the best way of getting that question answered."