Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "RT/meetings/PMC Minutes 100505"

< RT‎ | meetings
m (New page: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3995#c3)
 
(Attendees)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3995#c3
+
== Attendees ==
 +
 
 +
* Tom W
 +
* Jesse M
 +
* Mark R
 +
* Mike K
 +
* Markus K
 +
* Peter K
 +
* Shawn S
 +
* Glyn N
 +
* Barb C
 +
* Hughes (Jetty)
 +
 
 +
== Agenda  ==
 +
 
 +
* Discuss the handling of Virgo dependencies ( [https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3995#c3 background]).
 +
* Discuss email from the IP Team regarding OSGi CQ requirements (Barb Cochrane).
 +
* Dependencies on testing
 +
* Jetty is almost ready for 7.1 release review
 +
 
 +
== Notes ==
 +
 
 +
=== Virgo Dependencies ===
 +
 
 +
* Enterprise bundle repository
 +
** 3rd party jars taking out of maven central with a proper OSGi manifest inserted.
 +
** This is a short term solution to make the migration to Virgo easier for the existing DM server community.
 +
** Will orbit take on the new meta-data.  Answer is no.  Glyn said the plan is to move away from com.springsource BSNs eventually.
 +
 
 +
=== Eclipse IP Team ===
 +
 
 +
* OSGi CQs, do we need more entered.
 +
** OSGi Companion Code - We should open a separate CQ for each companion code jar
 +
** OSGi Specifications - We should open a separate CQ for each specification document (4 at this time)
 +
** Each project must open a separate CQ that piggy backs on the original CQ (companion or specification).
 +
 
 +
=== Dependencies on Testing ===
 +
 
 +
* CQs must still be open but the conclusion is that they would be a works with dependency.  The dependencies are not shipped with the project and are not needed at runtime.

Latest revision as of 13:33, 10 May 2010

Attendees

  • Tom W
  • Jesse M
  • Mark R
  • Mike K
  • Markus K
  • Peter K
  • Shawn S
  • Glyn N
  • Barb C
  • Hughes (Jetty)

Agenda

  • Discuss the handling of Virgo dependencies ( background).
  • Discuss email from the IP Team regarding OSGi CQ requirements (Barb Cochrane).
  • Dependencies on testing
  • Jetty is almost ready for 7.1 release review

Notes

Virgo Dependencies

  • Enterprise bundle repository
    • 3rd party jars taking out of maven central with a proper OSGi manifest inserted.
    • This is a short term solution to make the migration to Virgo easier for the existing DM server community.
    • Will orbit take on the new meta-data. Answer is no. Glyn said the plan is to move away from com.springsource BSNs eventually.

Eclipse IP Team

  • OSGi CQs, do we need more entered.
    • OSGi Companion Code - We should open a separate CQ for each companion code jar
    • OSGi Specifications - We should open a separate CQ for each specification document (4 at this time)
    • Each project must open a separate CQ that piggy backs on the original CQ (companion or specification).

Dependencies on Testing

  • CQs must still be open but the conclusion is that they would be a works with dependency. The dependencies are not shipped with the project and are not needed at runtime.

Back to the top