Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Planning Council/Sept 03 2008"

m
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
==Attendees==
 
==Attendees==
* TBD
+
* Richard Gronback
 +
* Neil Hauge
 +
* David Williams
 +
* Philippe Mulet
 +
* Brian Fitzpatrick
 +
* Anthony Hunter
 +
* Ed Merks
 +
* (Add your name here...)
 +
 
 +
=== Regrets ===
 +
* Oisin Hurley
 +
* Doug Gaff
 +
* Markus Knauer
  
 
==Topics==
 
==Topics==
* IP process improvement discussion (Janet - tentative)
 
 
* Galileo [[Galileo_Simultaneous_Release#Requirements_For_Participation|Requirements for Participation]] - begin to discuss each (keep, toss, amend)  
 
* Galileo [[Galileo_Simultaneous_Release#Requirements_For_Participation|Requirements for Participation]] - begin to discuss each (keep, toss, amend)  
* Meeting time: can we move to one hour later to accommodate Philippe M.?  Will this help John D.?
+
** Accessibility? New project at Eclipse to aid in development guidelines?  ACTF?
 +
** How to verify? Tooling? Checklist updated per milestone?  - We need to define a process of validating. Use bugzilla? (use priority for must/should do, assign milestone, assign to each project for each item and track with report?)
 +
** Make capabilities definition a must-do? Package separately?
 +
** Add Babel participation as a must-doNeed agreed upon date for string freeze for localization.
 +
** Increase importance of API usage violations?  Make a "strong recommendation"?  Advertise tooling/best practices.  Document all exceptions with plan for migration off improper usage, including bugs submitted to open API where required.
 +
** Order should do list by priority.
 +
** Suggest M6 as API freeze for all (documented?)
 +
** Suggest M7 as the latest performance & scalability testing for all projects (currently, the milestone used by platform)
 +
** Look in RSS feed requirement
 +
** Splash page icon (#12)
 +
** About dialog icons?
 +
** Combine Encouraged and Could Do into Must/Should do list (or, use P1-P4 in bugzilla?)
 +
** Define what is found in an SDK to provide consistency (finally)?
 
* In person meeting to coincide with [http://www.eclipseworld.net EclipseWorld]
 
* In person meeting to coincide with [http://www.eclipseworld.net EclipseWorld]
 
* December 10-11, 2008 - plenary session with Board
 
* December 10-11, 2008 - plenary session with Board
  
 
== Additional Topics ==
 
== Additional Topics ==
* TBD
+
* IP process improvement discussion with Janet Campbell - conflict for this call, so perhaps the next?
  
 
==Action Items==
 
==Action Items==
 +
* Query Babel project for string freeze deadline and participation requirement info (Rich)
 +
* Query ACTF for information on accessibility to include as release requirement (Rich)
 
* Investigate the use of p2 to create a "virtual" simultaneous release update site, sans the jar copying (Rich)
 
* Investigate the use of p2 to create a "virtual" simultaneous release update site, sans the jar copying (Rich)
 
* Look into having a "name that train" contest to coincide with EclipseCon each year (artwork as well?) (Bjorn)
 
* Look into having a "name that train" contest to coincide with EclipseCon each year (artwork as well?) (Bjorn)

Latest revision as of 05:43, 5 September 2008

Meeting Title: Planning Council Conference Call
Date & Time: Wednesday Sept 03, 2008 at 1600 UTC / 0900 SFO / 1200 NYC / 1700 London / 1800 Berlin
Dial-in: For the call-in numbers, please see the Portal page.

Attendees

  • Richard Gronback
  • Neil Hauge
  • David Williams
  • Philippe Mulet
  • Brian Fitzpatrick
  • Anthony Hunter
  • Ed Merks
  • (Add your name here...)

Regrets

  • Oisin Hurley
  • Doug Gaff
  • Markus Knauer

Topics

  • Galileo Requirements for Participation - begin to discuss each (keep, toss, amend)
    • Accessibility? New project at Eclipse to aid in development guidelines? ACTF?
    • How to verify? Tooling? Checklist updated per milestone? - We need to define a process of validating. Use bugzilla? (use priority for must/should do, assign milestone, assign to each project for each item and track with report?)
    • Make capabilities definition a must-do? Package separately?
    • Add Babel participation as a must-do? Need agreed upon date for string freeze for localization.
    • Increase importance of API usage violations? Make a "strong recommendation"? Advertise tooling/best practices. Document all exceptions with plan for migration off improper usage, including bugs submitted to open API where required.
    • Order should do list by priority.
    • Suggest M6 as API freeze for all (documented?)
    • Suggest M7 as the latest performance & scalability testing for all projects (currently, the milestone used by platform)
    • Look in RSS feed requirement
    • Splash page icon (#12)
    • About dialog icons?
    • Combine Encouraged and Could Do into Must/Should do list (or, use P1-P4 in bugzilla?)
    • Define what is found in an SDK to provide consistency (finally)?
  • In person meeting to coincide with EclipseWorld
  • December 10-11, 2008 - plenary session with Board

Additional Topics

  • IP process improvement discussion with Janet Campbell - conflict for this call, so perhaps the next?

Action Items

  • Query Babel project for string freeze deadline and participation requirement info (Rich)
  • Query ACTF for information on accessibility to include as release requirement (Rich)
  • Investigate the use of p2 to create a "virtual" simultaneous release update site, sans the jar copying (Rich)
  • Look into having a "name that train" contest to coincide with EclipseCon each year (artwork as well?) (Bjorn)

Back to the top