| Chris Aniszczyk |
|
| Cedric Brun |
|
| Oliver Cole |
Y
|
| Stefan Daume |
|
| Brian Fitzpatrick |
Y
|
| Wayne Beaton |
Y
|
| Doug Gaff |
R
|
| Neil Hauge |
Y
|
| Mika Hoikkala |
|
| Anthony Hunter |
Y
|
| Oisin Hurley |
Y
|
| Markus Knauer |
Y
|
| Christian Kurzke |
|
| Gary Xue |
Y
|
| Ed Merks |
|
| Mike Milinkovich |
|
| Philippe Mulet |
|
| James Saliba |
|
| Georg Schmidt |
|
| Karsten Schmidt |
Y
|
| Kaloyan Raev |
Y
|
| Thomas Watson |
Y
|
| David Williams |
Y
|
Note: feel free to correct any errors/omissions in above attendance record.
Topics
- Conclude Naming next year's release (Thanks Oliver).
- See the doodle poll
- And especially last few comments in bug 271054
- Helios. The runner up was Halley. (in case EMO Legal review finds issue with Helios).
- PC Decision on Categories in Discovery Site
- Business Intelligence: See bug 275392
- PC decide B I R C was ok (best we could do, this year, but subject to change next year, as they all are).
- DSDP Category name change: bug 277006
- PC didn't like the exact proposal. Will comment in bug, and await reply.
- Good, brief discussion on this topic in general, for next year. May want to be more creative and consider multilevel categories, wizards that could help narrow interests (and "include source" checkbox choice), should also better represent _the_ packages that are available from EPP (e.g. "RCP Developer").
- PC Position on off-cycle releases and use of discovery site (and EPP)? This came up in discussions about a Pulsar package.
- Conclusion: we do not want to support off-cycle releases. But with following compromise: If a project still met all the normal "release criteria" set forth as must-do's by PC then they could introduce something new during SR1 or SR2 (that is SR1 and SR2 can have more than service, if important, and must-do criteria met). The reason for not supporting things off cycle was a. it is more work to support it, b. there is no opportunity for "simultaneous release" testing, c. it would dilute the meaning of "simultaneous release".
- Are we happy with "must do" compliance?
- Judging from items not marked, it appears these are the projects of worst quality (or, worst adopter readiness?):
- EMFT 20
- PDT 15
- CDT 14
- MAT 13
- MDT 10
- Done yet?
- Regularly scheduled one on first Wednesday of Month: June 3, 12 Noon Eastern
- Upcoming topics
- Frequency and dates of maintenance builds
- Dates for next year's project plans
- Wayne volunteer to check how done in past, and if Board or EMOD had any critera (and the answer was "no", up to PC).
- Build schedule for next year (start with M1)
Reference Links
Galileo Simultaneous Release
Planning Council Members
Simultaneous_Release_Roles and Simultaneous_Release_Roles/EMO
|
