Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Planning Council/June 03 2015"
m (/* New Business) |
m (/* Mars Planning) |
||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
* Any issues? | * Any issues? | ||
| + | :* What happened to "WindowBuilder"? | ||
== Progress on Action Items == | == Progress on Action Items == | ||
Revision as of 11:35, 3 June 2015
Contents
Logistics
| Meeting Title: | Planning Council Conference Call |
| Date & Time: | Wednesday, June 3, 2015, at 1200 Noon Eastern |
| Dial in: | (See Asterisk service for complete details on SIP, potential new numbers, phone mute commands, etc.)
Phone Numbers: (Check Asterisk/Numbers for more or current phone numbers.)
|
Members and Attendees
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Note: "Inactive" refers to Strategic Members or PMCs we have not heard from for a while, and have been unable to convince to participate. Those members can become active again at any time. Contact David Williams if questions.
Note: feel free to correct any errors/omissions in above attendance record.
Y = Yes, attended
N = No, did not
R = regrets sent ahead of time
D = delegated
X = not expected
Announcements
- Welcome ...
Previous meeting minutes
- Review previous meeting minutes if you'd like.
Mars Planning
- Any issues?
- What happened to "WindowBuilder"?
Progress on Action Items
- Improving user experience in finding right function to install. For latest ideas, see
- bug 459905 - Create a Marketplace for the simultaneous release.
- Continuing Discussion of if and how to change "yearly release"?
- I have started a "design" wiki page, to act as a "design document", to help centralize the main points we have discussed.
- Notes from the last meeting:
- = = = = = = = = =
- Seemed to be rough agreement that to "release more frequently" would be good ... for projects and perception.
- Was discussion that "6 per year" too many ... "2 per year" not enough. So settled on "4 per year" as a working assumption.
- Did not really discuss WHEN they would be (which months), but (I think) general agreement they should be regular, and predictable.
- Did not really discuss what to call them. We want to convey they are true releases, but, releases with no subsequent service release.
- "SR" name especially bad for perception, since it is not really just "service releases" any more.
- But, even if we had 4 releases per year, some might put in "just service", some might put in new features, so adds some complexity on what and how to communicate (with each other, and community).
- We would always (still) need "two streams" going ... one for "next immediate release", ... another stream for "long term work". (Or, may vary by project?)
- We did NOT discuss how to manage that ... would "long term work" be merged into "release" stream at certain points?
- We would (still) want something like a yearly "LTS Release".
- We did say it would take at least 2 months for us to have a concrete proposal.
- = = = = = = = = =
New Business
- * ?
Next Meeting
- August 5, 2015 - Regular First Wednesday Meeting -- We traditionally skip July, since a) just released b) Holidays and vacations.
Reference
- 2013 EclipseCon face-to-face follow-through action items. For original meeting notes, see Planning_Council/March_24_2013 and for discussion leading to action items, see Planning_Council/April_10_2013. For last status update, see Planning_Council/May_8_2013.