Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Modeling PMC Meeting, 2010-01-19"

(Topics)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
===Expected Attendees===
 
===Expected Attendees===
 
* Ed Merks
 
* Ed Merks
* Sven Efftinge
+
* Sven Efftinge * absent
 
* Paul Elder
 
* Paul Elder
* Cedric Brun
+
* Cedric Brun * absent
 
* Kenn Hussey
 
* Kenn Hussey
* Frédéric Jouault
+
* Frédéric Jouault *absent
* Anthony Hunter
+
* Anthony Hunter * absent
* Artem Tikhomirov
+
* Artem Tikhomirov *absent
  
 
===Topics===
 
===Topics===
 +
 
* Graphiti
 
* Graphiti
 
** What's the impact on the project structure?
 
** What's the impact on the project structure?
 +
*** It's hard to discuss this without the involved/interested parties present.
  
 
* SDKs and Examples
 
* SDKs and Examples
 
** Should SDKs include examples? Can we establish (and adhere to) a convention for all Modeling projects?
 
** Should SDKs include examples? Can we establish (and adhere to) a convention for all Modeling projects?
 +
*** We didn't discuss this.  For the EMF SDK we provide examples that can be materialized in the workspace.
  
 
* Capabilities
 
* Capabilities
 
** Should all Modeling projects provide their own builds of capabilities bundles, or just documentation for interested packages/products?. See [https://bugs.eclipse.org/299344 299344]
 
** Should all Modeling projects provide their own builds of capabilities bundles, or just documentation for interested packages/products?. See [https://bugs.eclipse.org/299344 299344]
 +
*** We didn't discuss this either.  Documenting it seems best...
 +
 +
* Modeling Package Mega Diet
 +
** Any opinion about only keeping a package with core components and provide a sexy discovery ui for all the complementary product?
 +
*** We agreed this sounded like a good direction.
 +
 +
* Modeling Project Clean-up
 +
** We need to determine which modeling projects are still active and terminate/archive ones that aren't.
 +
*** Kenn is active on getting a handle of what's active and what needs to be archived.
 +
 +
* Helios Participation
 +
** Kenn has send out a request to ensure that information about Helios participation is correct and complete. Has everyone responded?
 +
*** Some folks have responded.
 +
 +
* Modeling Project Runway
 +
** Need to finalize list of participants in Modeling project runway at Eclipse.
 +
*** The suggestion was to prioritize folks who don't have another slot of time as part of another talk.
 +
 
[[Category:Modeling_Meetings]]
 
[[Category:Modeling_Meetings]]

Latest revision as of 17:36, 19 January 2010

Time: 10:00AM Eastern

Conference number: North America 1 866-842-3549, Global +800-4444-7070, Ottawa 613-787-5018, Passcode: 1556241

  • International Toll-free number notes
    • Dialing from a cellular network may not work!
    • Passcode is often not recognized. After the third failure, you will be transferred to an operator who will ask for the conference ID (1556241), sponsoring company (IBM) and meeting organizer (Paul Elder).
    • Pressing *0 will bring you directly to an operator.

Expected Attendees

  • Ed Merks
  • Sven Efftinge * absent
  • Paul Elder
  • Cedric Brun * absent
  • Kenn Hussey
  • Frédéric Jouault *absent
  • Anthony Hunter * absent
  • Artem Tikhomirov *absent

Topics

  • Graphiti
    • What's the impact on the project structure?
      • It's hard to discuss this without the involved/interested parties present.
  • SDKs and Examples
    • Should SDKs include examples? Can we establish (and adhere to) a convention for all Modeling projects?
      • We didn't discuss this. For the EMF SDK we provide examples that can be materialized in the workspace.
  • Capabilities
    • Should all Modeling projects provide their own builds of capabilities bundles, or just documentation for interested packages/products?. See 299344
      • We didn't discuss this either. Documenting it seems best...
  • Modeling Package Mega Diet
    • Any opinion about only keeping a package with core components and provide a sexy discovery ui for all the complementary product?
      • We agreed this sounded like a good direction.
  • Modeling Project Clean-up
    • We need to determine which modeling projects are still active and terminate/archive ones that aren't.
      • Kenn is active on getting a handle of what's active and what needs to be archived.
  • Helios Participation
    • Kenn has send out a request to ensure that information about Helios participation is correct and complete. Has everyone responded?
      • Some folks have responded.
  • Modeling Project Runway
    • Need to finalize list of participants in Modeling project runway at Eclipse.
      • The suggestion was to prioritize folks who don't have another slot of time as part of another talk.

Back to the top