Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "MicroProfile/ContributingGuidelines"
(documented our CQ process) |
(→Deliverable group and artifact naming convention: Clarified maven artifact naming schema and aling it with current best practice) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Ways to contribute == | == Ways to contribute == | ||
* Propose ideas or give feedback in the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/microprofile MicroProfile Google Group (Forum)] | * Propose ideas or give feedback in the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/microprofile MicroProfile Google Group (Forum)] | ||
| − | * [ | + | * [[MicroProfile/FeatureInit|Submit a proposal]] for a new specification or improvement |
| − | * Create a pull request | + | * Create a pull request (before a PR can be accepted, its contributor must undergo Eclipse processes, mainly sign the [https://www.eclipse.org/legal/CLA.php Eclipse Foundation Contributor License Agreement] |
* Become a project committer (a contributor is nominated by one of the project committers and other committers vote about the nomination) | * Become a project committer (a contributor is nominated by one of the project committers and other committers vote about the nomination) | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
| − | groupId: org.eclipse.microprofile. | + | groupId: org.eclipse.microprofile.<subproject> for all subprojects (specs/features or any other project like conference app) |
artifactId: microprofile-<subproject>-<submodule> | artifactId: microprofile-<subproject>-<submodule> | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
| − | org.eclipse.microprofile | + | org.eclipse.microprofile.config : microprofile-config-api - for the Config API |
| − | org.eclipse.microprofile | + | org.eclipse.microprofile.config : microprofile-config-tck - for the Config TCK |
org.eclipse.microprofile.conference : microprofile-conference - for Conference Demo app | org.eclipse.microprofile.conference : microprofile-conference - for Conference Demo app | ||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | The same project will have the same groupId. | + | The same project will have the same groupId for all artifacts (including parent). |
== Java package naming conventions == | == Java package naming conventions == | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
The discussion about this convention is [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/microprofile/3Pdk1gRlVnQ on the mailing list here]. | The discussion about this convention is [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/microprofile/3Pdk1gRlVnQ on the mailing list here]. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 18:42, 24 August 2017
Contents
Guidelines for contributing to the MicroProfile project
Ways to contribute
- Propose ideas or give feedback in the MicroProfile Google Group (Forum)
- Submit a proposal for a new specification or improvement
- Create a pull request (before a PR can be accepted, its contributor must undergo Eclipse processes, mainly sign the Eclipse Foundation Contributor License Agreement
- Become a project committer (a contributor is nominated by one of the project committers and other committers vote about the nomination)
Documentation Formatting Guidelines
Per a recent discussion and "vote" on our Google Group Forum, it has been decided that AsciiDoc will be our preferred documentation formatting language. Please use AsciiDoc (.adoc) for creating and formatting any proposals, specifications, README files, CONTRIBUTING files, etc as you develop artifacts for the MicroProfile project.
License of the contributed resources
All code and resources submitted via a pull request or directly (by a committer) should be licensed under the Apache License Version 2.0
License header
All files must include a license header. Moreover, a NOTICE file should exist for each repository. Author tags under a license header are optional and not mandated by the Eclipse foundation. It's strongly recommended to abide by the following templates:
A license header (included in the beginning of each file):
/**********************************************************************
* Copyright (c) {DATE} Contributors to the Eclipse Foundation
*
* See the NOTICES file(s) distributed with this work for additional
* information regarding copyright ownership.
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* You may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
**********************************************************************/
{DATE} can either be a single year or a range of years separated by a comma.
NOTICE file (in the root of each repository):
SPDXVersion: SPDX-2.1
PackageName: Eclipse Microprofile
PackageHomePage: http://www.eclipse.org/microprofile
PackageLicenseDeclared: Apache-2.0
PackageCopyrightText: <text>
{Legal Entity 1}
{Legal Entity 2}
{Legal Entity 3}
...
</text>
The NOTICE file also has to be included in all distribution artifacts (JAR, WAR, etc.).
The templates were discussed with Eclipse mentors:
- https://groups.google.com/d/msg/microprofile/sRqsnPTkkKE/V657wvPWAgAJ
- https://groups.google.com/d/msg/microprofile/jq-vH2RqZRw/zg1irCmoAAAJ
Deliverable group and artifact naming convention
We have decided here on the mailing list that we'll use the following convention for (maven) artifact and group names:
groupId: org.eclipse.microprofile.<subproject> for all subprojects (specs/features or any other project like conference app) artifactId: microprofile-<subproject>-<submodule>
Examples:
org.eclipse.microprofile.config : microprofile-config-api - for the Config API
org.eclipse.microprofile.config : microprofile-config-tck - for the Config TCK
org.eclipse.microprofile.conference : microprofile-conference - for Conference Demo app
org.eclipse.microprofile.conference : microprofile-conference-session - for the session module of the Conference app
The same project will have the same groupId for all artifacts (including parent).
Java package naming conventions
CDI API package names
The CDI API classes should be placed in a subpackage inject of the API. E.g., if the API package is named org.eclipse.microprofile.abcspec, then the package name for the CDI API should be org.eclipse.microprofile.abcspec.inject. This is to follow the convention used in javax.inject and javax.enterprise.inject.
The discussion about this convention is on the mailing list here.