Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "JWT Metamodel"

(Metamodel and XPDL 1.0)
(Metamodel and XPDL 1.0)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
== Metamodel and XPDL 1.0 ==
 
== Metamodel and XPDL 1.0 ==
  
The document [[Image:AgilPro_Metamodel.pdf]] describes an initial revision of the document comparing the AgilPro metamodel with the XPDL 1.0 schema.
+
The document [[Image:AgilPro_Metamodel.pdf]] describes an initial revision of the document comparing the JWT/AgilPro metamodel with the XPDL 1.0 schema.
 
It covers all the XPDL elements as well as the Bonita engine vendor specific extensions.
 
It covers all the XPDL elements as well as the Bonita engine vendor specific extensions.
 +
 +
== Metamodel and BPMN ==
 +
 +
Please find under [[Image:Comparison_JWT_BPMN_v0_3.pdf]] a document describing the differences between the JWT Metamodel on the one hand and BPMN on the other.

Revision as of 08:17, 4 December 2007

Metamodel

This page describes the discussions and requirements for the meta-model of JWT. Based on the existing meta-model of AgilPro we will summarize all wishes, extensions etc. on this page.


Initial metamodel

This document File:AgilPro MetamodelDescription.pdf describes the metamodel of AgilPro as it is today (2007-02-21). This document will be the basis for discussions on all working groups who have requirements on the meta-model.

A comparison with other meta-models as a result of an evaluation can be found in the following document: File:EvaluationExistingMetamodels.pdf.


Metamodel and XPDL 1.0

The document File:AgilPro Metamodel.pdf describes an initial revision of the document comparing the JWT/AgilPro metamodel with the XPDL 1.0 schema. It covers all the XPDL elements as well as the Bonita engine vendor specific extensions.

Metamodel and BPMN

Please find under File:Comparison JWT BPMN v0 3.pdf a document describing the differences between the JWT Metamodel on the one hand and BPMN on the other.

Back to the top