View source for JEE Status Meetings/2010-01-14

== Attendees  ==
* Carl Anderson
* Chuck Bridgham
* Kaloyan Raev
* Jason Peterson
* Angel Vera
* Jason Sholl

== Agenda  ==

==== Java EE 6  ====
:Java EE 6 model updates - see [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=299598 bug 299598]
:EJB 3.1 bugs of note: [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=241667 241667] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=241668 241668] [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=299086 299086]
:[http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=Javaee6wizards Glassfish Java EE 6 wizards]
:[http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=webtools.jeetools Java EE Tools plan]
:[http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=webtools.ejbtools EJB Tools plan]
:List of [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=WebTools&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=JavaEE6&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= Java EE 6] bugs that need to be rolled into the WTP 3.2 plan

==== Virtual Component  ====
:Migrate Java EE Deployables to use the new VCF traversal logic [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=297653 297653]
:Make export operation pull from wst.server APIs to reduce redundancy and inconsistancy [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=265798 265798] - Committed to WTP 3.2 M4
:Allow simple but extensible Virtual Component Framework traversal  [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=296764 296764] - Committed to WTP 3.2 M5

==== Flexible Modules  ====

:[http://bugs.eclipse.org/290041 Replace Existing JavaEE Dependencies page]
:Bugs marked with the [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&classification=WebTools&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=Flexible+Modules&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= Flexible Modules] whiteboard entry

==== Other topics  ====
Server Tools Enhancements:  [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=293742 293742]   [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=292194 292194]   [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=291833 291833]  [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=286699 286699]   [https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=282483 282483]

== Minutes ==

Carl: I sent a note to wtp-dev about bug 299598.  In the EJB 3.1 bugs of note section, I added bug 299086.

Kaloyan:  I started working on 241667 and 241668.  We are waiting to hear back from the Glassfish team on all three of these bugs - we will wait a week before attempting to do these ourselves.

Chuck:  Do we have any updates on when Glassfish will contribute?

Kaloyan:  No.

Carl:  I added the link Rochelle sent me for the Glassfish Java EE 6 wizards

Kaloyan:  It all looks good to me.

Carl:  Chuck, you said last week that you were going to take a pass through the plan and target things- did you get a chance?

Chuck: No.  We are looking through the list and working towards targets.  We should know in a day or two.  Another thing the Glassfish team had mentioned were the Servlet 3.0 elements- that is currently deferred, but if they contribute, we will put in a milestone for it.

Kaloyan:  What about the deployment descriptor trees?  Are they going to appear in the Project Explorer out of the box?

Carl:  That hasn't been done yet.

Chuck:  I thought the item providers worked on the existing models already.

Kaloyan:  When I did the smoke test recently, I didn't see that for Java EE 6.  I will open a bug about this, then.

Carl: Anything else on Java EE 6?

Kaloyan:  There is bug 252618 - we weren't sure when Java EE 6 would come out.  We wanted to put in an extension point or something so adopters can contribute when Java EE 6 is released.

Chuck:  What kind of extensibility are you looking for?

Kaloyan:  Extensibility such as what is run when the new facet is added.  That way adopters can do the rest of the Java EE 6 functionality in their product.  Then, when Java EE 6 was postponed again, we decommitted this enhancement.

Chuck:  In terms of adding additiona operations on finish - that is already there.  In terms of replacing the operation that is run, that would be a lot of work.

Kaloyan:  I was meaning moreso that we rework this bug such that, now that Java EE 6 is there, we can use this to get the Java EE 6 elements all working correctly.

Chuck:  So what you mean is going through each of the wizards, one by one, and make sure they work?

Kaloyan:  Yes.  For example, EJB 3.1 is very similar to EJB 3.0.  But for Servlet 3.0, it would be adding the generation of annotations into the servlet code.

Chuck:  Can we either add more detail to this bugzilla, or else open separate ones?

Kaloyan:  Yes.  I will do that.

Angel:  I sent Jason Peterson a note about the test results after I apply the patch.

Jason P:  If you apply the entire patch with his test case updates, then the JUnits pass.  The question is, are you OK with his JUnit updates?

Angel:  I will look at the changes this week, and see if we can get these in this week.

Chuck:  Can you give us a quick status?

Jason P:  The deploy code is complete.  The model is done- that code is all committed.  I am currently working on the export code- getting it to use the new model.

Chuck:  Do we want to try to rush this in, so that it is smoke tested today?

Jason P:  That's what Rob wanted.

Chuck:  I tend to agree.  Angel - can you rush this review?  That way we have people pounding on it for a week.

Carl:  I worry about another major change.  We already have the Java Facet changes this week.

Angel:  I think getting it in would be good.  If we find a problem, we can always yank it out next week.

Jason P:  The biggest change is the children count vs. members count - he updated the counts, and he changed the id references from display name.

Angel:  The change of id is what worries me moreso than the counts.

Jason P:  I only remember that hitting one test case.

Chuck:  Angel, if there is any way you can review those before the WTP meeting, we can decide about the respin then.

Angel:  One of the server tools enhancements is already closed.  I still have to review the other ones.