Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes"
< IoT
| (224 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The | + | {| align="right" |
| + | | <googlecalendar title="IoT WG Meeting" mode="AGENDA" height="300" width="100%">u5j68s710reqmr37vd78jdlbm4%40group.calendar.google.com</googlecalendar> | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | The Internet of Things Industry Working Group is holding bi-weekly calls on Tuesday at 17:00CET.<br> | ||
| + | Participation to these calls is restricted to members of the IWG, but the minutes are public. We alternate between marketing-focused calls (upcoming events coordination, community outreach, etc.), and technical calls mostly targeting project leads, to synchronize cross-project activities. | ||
| − | The meetings are held via | + | The meetings are held via the Zoom conferencing service. Details to access the meeting are the following: |
| − | + | Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: [https://eclipse.zoom.us/j/646159255 | |
| + | ] | ||
| − | * | + | Or Telephone: |
| + | *Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location)： | ||
| + | **US: +1 646 876 9923 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 408 638 0968 | ||
| + | **Canada: +1 647 558 0588 | ||
| + | **France: +33 (0) 1 8288 0188 | ||
| + | **Germany: +49 (0) 30 3080 6188 | ||
| + | **Italy: +39 069 480 6488 | ||
| + | **United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 3695 0088 | ||
| − | + | Meeting ID: 646 159 255 | |
| + | International numbers available: [https://eclipse.zoom.us/zoomconference?m=_pNyfcDAWXapKzsyyl4qMTwg6x8WkM7D] | ||
| − | + | Or iPhone one-tap : | |
| − | + | * US: +16468769923,,976345400# or +16699006833,,976345400# | |
| − | * | + | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ---------------------------------------- | |
| − | = | + | = Feb 1, 2017 (WG Call)= |
| − | + | == Participants == | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | *Dan Gross, Samsung | |
| − | + | *James Sutton, IBM | |
| − | + | *David Bericat, Red Hat | |
| − | + | *Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ | |
| + | *Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Brad Micklea, Codenvy | ||
| − | == | + | == Agenda == |
| + | === Eclipse IoT Testbeds: review strategy and next steps. === | ||
| + | Work on a set of industry oriented (vertical solutions) to showcase a technical solution and showcase the Eclipse projects and vendor ecosystem. | ||
| + | Eclipse IoT Members working together to set-up the testbed and create a demo that runs 24/7 on the Eclipse servers | ||
| + | More details: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nmdi-cmw_O-7W2qZKRHMN-3gw0WHxE75llcV0nMhS-U/edit?usp=sharing | ||
| + | Proposed Testbed scenario around Asset Tracking Management: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1KF7yxv5Dnk6b2a574HPtU5pHR5q7wvsT4skKjGDz1Q4/edit?usp=sharing | ||
| + | There are many options for collaboration | ||
| − | * | + | *Dan Gross: Samsung interested in participating - Kura gateway using ARTIK. |
| − | * | + | *Laurent Lagosanto: Potential use case for Eclipse Edje. |
| − | * | + | *David Bericat: Excited and look forward to working with everyone. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | '''Next Steps''': Stay tuned, we will be updating the group at large and scheduling individual meetings. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | === 2. MQTT 5: Update from Ian Craggs / James Sutton on what’s in MQTT 5 and the expected impact on Eclipse Paho / Mosquitto and downstream adopters. === |
| − | * | + | '''Big set of changes:''' |
| − | * | + | *Use of the publish/subscribe message pattern which provides one-to-many message distribution and decoupling of applications. |
| − | * | + | *A messaging transport that is agnostic to the content of the payload. |
| + | *Three qualities of service for message delivery: | ||
| + | **At most once", where messages are delivered according to the best efforts of the operating environment. Message loss can occur. This level could be used, for example, with ambient sensor data where it does not matter if an individual reading is lost as the next one will be published soon after. | ||
| + | **At least once", where messages are assured to arrive but duplicates can occur. | ||
| + | **"Exactly once", where messages are assured to arrive exactly once. This level could be used, for example, with billing systems where duplicate or lost messages could lead to incorrect charges being applied. | ||
| + | *A small transport overhead and protocol exchanges minimized to reduce network traffic. | ||
| + | *A mechanism to notify interested parties when an abnormal disconnection occurs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Notes from the meeting:''' | ||
| + | *Any request sent (and reply received) can have embedded metadata. This will be used for e.g letting a publisher know about *what* happened to the packet in addition to just acknowledging it | ||
| + | **The CONNECT packet can contain information regarding what QoS are supported by the server | ||
| + | **Supporting QoS 2 on the server is not mandatory anymore | ||
| + | **Scalability | ||
| + | *It will affect the Paho client and so a new Paho client will be created. | ||
| + | **Improve API | ||
| + | **Feedback from community | ||
| + | **Work nicely with the new MQTT 5 features | ||
| + | *The complete move will take a while, MQTT 3 will not go away anytime soon. It will be a parallel process. The previous versions of the client will be maintained. Some users might choose to use MQTT 3 since it’s more lightweight. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''IMPORTANT:''' Get your feedback in as soon as possible, because in a few months it will be finalized, so review the specifications. View working draft 10 dated January 4: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?num_per_wg=10&wg_abbrev=mqtt | ||
| + | === 3. PMC topics: project documentation, build machines, Docker, … === | ||
| + | Skipped this item - not enough PMC members on the call | ||
| − | = | + | === 4. Misc. updates === |
| + | *WG Meeting at the Eclipse IoT Day San Jose Add your project for project update or intro: https://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseIoT_SanJose2017 | ||
| + | *IoT Developer Survey Test it and give us feedback! It will go live next week. https://www.surveymonkey.net/r/Preview/?sm=PpPJLkX2kyFIkd4FpbfnijKgtSau8CTbzClUcIqMOv8UHpkGU6kxWrpBNJfYHpzC | ||
| + | *Member companies are encouraged to ask for a special link that they can use to promote the survey to their communities, and have access to answers based on this segment. | ||
| + | Open IoT Challenge: we will schedule a live hangout for project leads to answer any technical questions the participant may have. https://iot.eclipse.org/open-iot-challenge/ | ||
| − | = | + | = Feb 15, 2017 (WG Call) = |
| − | * | + | == Participants == |
| − | * | + | *Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom |
| − | * Benjamin Cabé, | + | *Jens Reimann, Red Hat |
| − | * | + | *Dejan Bosanac, Red Hat |
| − | * | + | *Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI |
| − | * | + | *Shuai li, CEA-LIST |
| − | + | *Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation | |
| + | *Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Dave Woodard, Eurotech | ||
| + | *Ian Craggs, IBM | ||
| + | *Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| + | ===Presentation new project proposal: Eclipse Ditto (Digital Twins) === | ||
| + | '''Presenter: Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI''' | ||
| − | + | Bosch will be proposing a new project called “Eclipse Ditto” soon for managing state of Digital Twins. Hopefully the proposal will be made next week. | |
| + | The Ditto Project will be a mediator between IoT Devices and the state of their Digital Twins. | ||
| + | Digital Twin is not really a fixed term. Bosch views Digital Twin as is a holistic view of all capabilities and aspects of a device/product asset including its digital representation. | ||
| + | Ultimate goal is to use the digital twin as a service. There would be a higher level API to work with individual devices and you wouldn’t have to know what is happening in the background. The plan is to integrate with Eclipse Vorto and Eclipse Kapua. | ||
| − | + | Read the one-page: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Ditto_Project.png | |
| − | * | + | *Questions: |
| − | + | Can changes to the state be made on the device of the twin, or is it only one way? The state of the device could be in both directions. Changes to the state on the device or the digital twin would change the state of the other one. | |
| − | + | A twin is not necessarily 1:1 device, a twin can represent many things (device + JVM + …) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Project Proposal: https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-ditto | |
| − | + | === Presentation by CEA-List on Model Design Environment for IoT === | |
| − | + | '''Presenter: Shuai li CEA-List''' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | * | + | *Slides: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:S3P-IoTModelingExecution_CEA_Primstech_MicroEJ-final.pdf |
| + | *Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JqAPRH0bfU | ||
| + | *For more details, contact Shuai li from CEA-List. | ||
| + | === Update on Testbeds === | ||
| + | '''Presenter Benjamin Cabé''' | ||
| − | + | Testbeds aim to showcase the software stack available from our open source projects, as well as the various offers that the WG members provide on top if it (cloud solutions, analytics platforms, hardware, integration services, …). | |
| − | + | The first testbed will be a solution for Asset Tracking Management, more specifically tracking the delivery of valuable parcels. The end-to-end solution will comprise embedded sensors that can be attached to the parcels to monitor e.g temperature or vibration, IoT gateways in order to collect the sensor data (for example inside the delivery truck), process it, and report it to a cloud backend where it can be further analyzed, or made available to 3rd party apps. Members currently participating: Red Hat + Eurotech | |
| − | + | A wiki page describes the solution https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/Testbeds/Asset_Tracking_Management and will be completed as other members jump on the train to extend the code scenario with their respective solutions. | |
| − | + | The code to replicate and demonstrate the testbed will be shared through https://github.com/eclipselabs/eclipseiot-testbed-assettracking. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Participation to the testbeds is open to any member of the IoT WG, and more details on the overall strategy are available at https://goo.gl/UeDekI. | |
| − | + | === Eclipse IoT Day in San Jose and Unconference === | |
| − | + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett''' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | We’re looking for use-case type speakers to present how their company uses Eclipse IoT projects. Last year at ECE 2016 we had a speaker from the Deutsche Bahn train system explain how Eclipse Paho and MQTT are used in their train systems. | |
| − | + | Ideally the speaker would be from the Bay area since this is short notice. Please let us know if you know anyone that could be a good candidate. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | === Eclipse Leshan Press Release === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett''' | ||
| − | + | Today, February 15, we issued a press release about Eclipse Leshan and Eclipse Waakama “Eclipse IoT Announces Support for OMA LightweightM2M 1.0 Device Management Standard” Read it here: http://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170215_lwm2m.php | |
| − | == | + | === IoT World plans === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett''' | ||
| − | + | Eclipse IoT will have a booth at IoT World and would like to coordinate with other members. We won’t be doing the pavilion since not enough members wanted to participate, but we will get in touch soon to partner with interested members, such as IOTRACKS, that showed interest in participating. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | === IoT Developer Survey === |
| + | '''Presenter: Roxanne Joncas''' | ||
| − | + | On February 7, we launched the third annual IoT Developer Survey. Please take the time to complete the survey and to share it with your coworkers and community. | |
| − | + | *Link to promote/share: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/iotsurvey2017eclipseiot | |
| + | *Graphic for promotion: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Iotsurveypartners.png | ||
| − | = | + | = Feb 15, 2017 (WG Call) = |
| − | == | + | == Participants == |
| − | + | *Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom | |
| − | * | + | *Jens Reimann, Red Hat |
| − | * | + | *Dejan Bosanac, Red Hat |
| − | * | + | *Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI |
| − | * | + | *Shuai li, CEA-LIST |
| − | * | + | *Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation |
| − | * Ian Skerrett | + | *Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation |
| − | * | + | *Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation |
| + | *Dave Woodard, Eurotech | ||
| + | *Ian Craggs, IBM | ||
| + | *Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| + | ===Presentation new project proposal: Eclipse Ditto (Digital Twins) === | ||
| + | '''Presenter: Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI''' | ||
| − | + | Bosch will be proposing a new project called “Eclipse Ditto” soon for managing state of Digital Twins. Hopefully the proposal will be made next week. | |
| + | The Ditto Project will be a mediator between IoT Devices and the state of their Digital Twins. | ||
| + | Digital Twin is not really a fixed term. Bosch views Digital Twin as is a holistic view of all capabilities and aspects of a device/product asset including its digital representation. | ||
| + | Ultimate goal is to use the digital twin as a service. There would be a higher level API to work with individual devices and you wouldn’t have to know what is happening in the background. The plan is to integrate with Eclipse Vorto and Eclipse Kapua. | ||
| − | + | Read the one-page: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Ditto_Project.png | |
| − | * | + | *Questions: |
| − | + | Can changes to the state be made on the device of the twin, or is it only one way? The state of the device could be in both directions. Changes to the state on the device or the digital twin would change the state of the other one. | |
| − | + | A twin is not necessarily 1:1 device, a twin can represent many things (device + JVM + …) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Project Proposal: https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-ditto | |
| − | == | + | === Presentation by CEA-List on Model Design Environment for IoT === |
| + | '''Presenter: Shuai li CEA-List''' | ||
| − | * | + | *Slides: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:S3P-IoTModelingExecution_CEA_Primstech_MicroEJ-final.pdf |
| − | * | + | *Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JqAPRH0bfU |
| − | * | + | *For more details, contact Shuai li from CEA-List. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | === Update on Testbeds === |
| + | '''Presenter Benjamin Cabé''' | ||
| − | + | Testbeds aim to showcase the software stack available from our open source projects, as well as the various offers that the WG members provide on top if it (cloud solutions, analytics platforms, hardware, integration services, …). | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | The first testbed will be a solution for Asset Tracking Management, more specifically tracking the delivery of valuable parcels. The end-to-end solution will comprise embedded sensors that can be attached to the parcels to monitor e.g temperature or vibration, IoT gateways in order to collect the sensor data (for example inside the delivery truck), process it, and report it to a cloud backend where it can be further analyzed, or made available to 3rd party apps. Members currently participating: Red Hat + Eurotech | |
| − | + | A wiki page describes the solution https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/Testbeds/Asset_Tracking_Management and will be completed as other members jump on the train to extend the code scenario with their respective solutions. | |
| − | + | The code to replicate and demonstrate the testbed will be shared through https://github.com/eclipselabs/eclipseiot-testbed-assettracking. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Participation to the testbeds is open to any member of the IoT WG, and more details on the overall strategy are available at https://goo.gl/UeDekI. | |
| − | + | === Eclipse IoT Day in San Jose and Unconference === | |
| − | + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett''' | |
| − | + | We’re looking for use-case type speakers to present how their company uses Eclipse IoT projects. Last year at ECE 2016 we had a speaker from the Deutsche Bahn train system explain how Eclipse Paho and MQTT are used in their train systems. | |
| − | + | Ideally the speaker would be from the Bay area since this is short notice. Please let us know if you know anyone that could be a good candidate. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | === Eclipse Leshan Press Release === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett''' | ||
| − | + | Today, February 15, we issued a press release about Eclipse Leshan and Eclipse Waakama “Eclipse IoT Announces Support for OMA LightweightM2M 1.0 Device Management Standard” Read it here: http://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170215_lwm2m.php | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | = | + | === IoT World plans === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett''' | ||
| − | + | Eclipse IoT will have a booth at IoT World and would like to coordinate with other members. We won’t be doing the pavilion since not enough members wanted to participate, but we will get in touch soon to partner with interested members, such as IOTRACKS, that showed interest in participating. | |
| − | * | + | === IoT Developer Survey === |
| − | * | + | '''Presenter: Roxanne Joncas''' |
| − | * | + | |
| − | * | + | On February 7, we launched the third annual IoT Developer Survey. Please take the time to complete the survey and to share it with your coworkers and community. |
| − | * Ian Skerrett | + | *Link to promote/share: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/iotsurvey2017eclipseiot |
| − | * | + | *Graphic for promotion: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Iotsurveypartners.png |
| + | |||
| + | = Mar 1, 2017 (WG Call) = | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Participants == | ||
| + | *Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Jens Reimann, Red Hat | ||
| + | *György Réthy, Ericsson | ||
| + | *Dave, IOTRACKS | ||
| + | *Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS | ||
| + | *Michael Limprecht, IOTRACKS | ||
| + | *James Sutton, IBM | ||
| + | *Ian Craggs, IBM | ||
| + | *Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ | ||
| + | *Henryk Konsek, Red Hat | ||
| + | *Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom | ||
| + | *Others who joined later | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| + | === Presentation from the Eclipse Titan team at Ericsson === | ||
| + | '''Presenter: György Réthy''' | ||
| − | + | Eclipse Titan is a tool built around the TTCN-3 testing standard, and it is very relevant for IoT as it can be used to test MQTT, CoAP, oneM2M, etc. communication scenarios. It was created by Ericsson 15 years ago and has been used internally ever since. It was open sourced 2 years ago at the Eclipse Foundation. | |
| − | * | + | *oneM2MTestter version 1.0 has been released |
| − | * | + | *No need to learn a new language |
| + | *Pilot with CoAP for modeling Testing | ||
| − | + | Question: Can you execute it in a headless mode? Yes, command line tools is the controller. There are also Eclipse plugins available for test executive that control the command line component. | |
| − | + | More information is available in the slides. | |
| − | + | *Slides: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Titan@EclipseIoTWG_20170301.pdf | |
| − | == | + | === Eclipse Foundation Security policy === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett ''' | ||
| − | + | Security is obviously a key concern for IoT so we would like to make sure everyone is familiar with the Security Policy in place at the Eclipse Foundation, and that all projects implement appropriate to let their users know how to report security issues, and know how to handle them. | |
| − | + | There is a security team at the Eclipse Foundation, Jens Reimann and Julien Vermillard are on this team to represent IoT. | |
| − | + | One of the problems: On Bugzilla, you can mark a bug as private and only the security team will see it and assign it from appropriate project leaders. For projects that use GitHub issues, there isn’t a way to make an issue private. These projects need a link on their site that instructs users to open any security vulnerability bugs on Buzgilla. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | All vulnerabilities will eventually need to be made public and the goal is to resolve any vulnerability within *3 months*. After 3 months, the vulnerability will be madepublic. | |
| − | * | + | *Questions can be sent to security@eclipse.org |
| + | *Next steps: Ian will talk to Wayne and get more concrete next steps. | ||
| + | *Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xZquUsFDnhxYAdlp8ImXqEueu5IiLFfuOAEPWkQp4Gs/edit?usp=sharing | ||
| − | == | + | === Eclipse IoT Day in San Jose and Unconference === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett''' | ||
| − | + | We’re looking for use-case type speakers to present how their company uses Eclipse IoT projects. Last year at ECE 2016 we had a speaker from the Deutsche Bahn train system explain how Eclipse Paho and MQTT are used in their train systems. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Ideally the speaker would be from the Bay area since this is short notice. Please let us know if you know anyone that could be a good candidate. | |
| − | + | For the IoT WG Meeting, feel free to suggest guest speakers. We already invited the OMA Group to give an update on LWM2M. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | = | + | === IoT Developer Survey === |
| + | '''Presenter: Roxanne Joncas''' | ||
| − | + | On February 7, we launched the third annual IoT Developer Survey. Please take the time to complete the survey and to share it with your coworkers and community. | |
| + | *Link to promote/share: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/iotsurvey2017eclipseiot | ||
| + | *Graphic for promotion: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Iotsurveypartners.png | ||
| − | + | = Apr 10, 2017 (WG Call) = | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | == Participants == | |
| − | * | + | *Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation |
| − | * | + | *Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation |
| − | * Ian Skerrett | + | *Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation |
| − | * | + | *James Drummond, Codenvy |
| + | *Kai Hudalla, Bosch SI | ||
| + | *Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS | ||
| + | *Jens Reimann, Red Hat | ||
| + | *Howard Green, Azul Systems | ||
| + | *Thibault Rouffineau, Canonical | ||
| + | *David Bericat, Red Hat | ||
| + | *Dan Gross, Samsung | ||
| + | *Others who joined later | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| + | === Hono Update === | ||
| + | '''Presenter: Kai Hudalla''' | ||
| + | *0.5 M6 Milestone of Hono released this week. | ||
| + | *3-4 weeks in between each release. It’s about continuously improving the system. Working on the telemetry system right now. Stability and resilience has improved, when services fail - how do they reconnect and start working without manual interference. | ||
| + | *Hackathon in Berlin at Bosch Connected World. Over 100 devices connected to a Hono instance to provide an API and build their solution on top of that. It was pretty successful. It was great because they users could focus on how to use the data, instead of how to connect. | ||
| + | *Finish up the remaining work around security and authorization to have a first 0.5 release with the full telemetry implementation ready in the summer. | ||
| + | *Rest + MQTT Adapter and custom ones to connect to LORA 1, but this one not standardized. Bosch camera (HTTP, but not RESTful). | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | + | === Review IoT Developer Survey Results === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett ''' | ||
| + | *Why isn’t automotive a top industry? | ||
| + | *Hard to get customers to buy in to the security | ||
| + | *It’s not cheap, and no one wants to pay for it | ||
| + | *If it’s a feature, it’s taken for granted | ||
| + | **We would have to check Node.js and JavaScript (in future remove Node.js) | ||
| + | *Discrepancy between Linux and ARM on constrained devices - people seem to have answered they run Linux on constrained devices while the dominant architecture seems to be very constrained ARM Cortex-M architectures. | ||
| + | *Slide #32 Security Boot to Secured boot | ||
| − | + | Report: https://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2017/04/19/iot-developer-trends-2017-edition/ | |
| − | + | Slides: https://www.slideshare.net/IanSkerrett/iot-developer-survey-2017 | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | === Proposal to Re-start IoT WG Steering Committee === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett ''' | ||
| + | *Purpose of the Steering Committee: To provide executive-level strategy, review, and oversight to the Eclipse IoT Working Group. | ||
| + | *Why do we need a steering committee? Who would be on the steering committee. | ||
| + | *Highly debated during the call, you can follow the discussion on the IoT-WG mailing list. | ||
| + | Details: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jBYPe1bojxvX3aka2fKk1FAGfmghIV284NK4ttiWucw/edit?usp=sharing | ||
| − | + | === Update of Eclipse IoT Open Testbeds === | |
| − | + | '''Presenter: Benjamin Cabé ''' | |
| − | * | + | *Testbeds are doing great and will be announced in two weeks prior to the Red Hat Summit in Boston, May 2-4. |
| − | * | + | *We will be hosting more testbeds in the future and every working group member is invited to participate or propose one. |
| − | = | + | = Apr 26, 2017 (WG Call) = |
| − | * | + | == Participants == |
| + | *Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Dejan Bosanac, Red Hat | ||
| + | *Mick Limprecht, IOTRACKS | ||
| + | *Kai Hudalla, Bosch SI | ||
| + | *James Kirkland, Red Hat | ||
| + | *Jens Reimann, Red Hat | ||
| + | *Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ | ||
| + | *David Bericat, Red Hat | ||
| + | *Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom | ||
| + | *Others who joined later | ||
| − | == | + | == Agenda == |
| − | * | + | == Testbed Update - Benjamin Cabé == |
| + | *New open IoT Testbed will be announced tomorrow | ||
| + | *Demo system and implementation of the testbed, Red Hat, Eurotech, Samsung, Azul Systems and Codenvy collaborated on an Asset Tracking Testbed. It features, Eclipse Kura, Eclipse Kapua, Eclipse Che, Samsung ARTIK and OpenShift. | ||
| − | + | Announcement: https://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170426_iottestbeds.php | |
| − | + | Testbed on Eclipse IoT: https://iot.eclipse.org/testbeds/ | |
| − | * | + | Asset Tracking Testbed: https://iot.eclipse.org/testbeds/asset-tracking/ |
| − | * | + | |
| − | * | + | Benjamin’s blog post: https://blog.benjamin-cabe.com/2017/04/27/unveiling-the-eclipse-iot-open-testbeds |
| − | * Ian Skerrett | + | |
| − | * | + | == Security policies for IoT projects - Jens Reimann == |
| + | We have been doing some work on the security policies. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Changes: | ||
| + | *New projects should know that there are security policies at the Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Encourage projects to put a link directing users to detailed information to report security issues against Eclipse IoT projects. | ||
| + | *New mandatory field = reporting security issues for Eclipse IoT projects in the release review. If there are none, just say none, but if there are just list them. If you can’t list them right away, you can just put the bugzilla link that is not publicly viewable to users. | ||
| + | *We will write this new information down so new and existing projects know how to do it and will send an email to inform projects how to proceed | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Update on a new IoT WG charter and Steering Committee - Ian Skerrett == | ||
| + | *With each Working Group at the Eclipse Foundation, there is a steering committee that helps make decisions. We used to have one when the working group was called M2M, but it didn’t work out for many reasons. We would like to relaunch it to make sure that the things we are producing are in agreement with what the overall community wants. | ||
| + | *We need to define roles and responsibilities in the charter. | ||
| + | *If the community doesn’t agree on something eventually the Steering Committee can help. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Plans for IoT World - Roxanne Joncas == | ||
| + | *Booth at the event, demoing the testbeds and Eclipse IoT Projects | ||
| + | *If you’d like to demo, just let us know! | ||
| + | |||
| + | == IoT Day in London and Munich - Ian Skerrett == | ||
| + | *Eclipse IoT Day @ThingMonk will take place September 11 in London, UK http://thingmonk.com/ | ||
| + | *Should we do an IoT Day in Munich the week of Sept 11? General consensus is not to have an Eclipse IoT Munich is too close to ECE in September, maybe in February or have a presence in Spain. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | = May 24, 2017 (WG Call) = | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Participants == | ||
| + | *Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | *Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation | ||
| + | * Kai Hudalla, Bosch SI | ||
| + | * Kai Hackbarth, Bosch | ||
| + | * Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ | ||
| + | * James Sutton | ||
| + | * Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom | ||
| + | * Jens Reimann, Red Hat | ||
| + | * James Kirkland, Red Hat | ||
| + | [ other people joined in late, feel free to add your name :-) ] | ||
== Agenda == | == Agenda == | ||
| + | === Update on IoT initiatives at OSGi Alliance - a brief update on the work the OSGi Alliance is doing around IoT === | ||
| + | '''Presenter: Kai Hackbarth, Bosch''' | ||
| − | * | + | OSGI IoT expert group started in 2015, before that there was a resident expert group focusing more on smart home, but we wanted to make it broader and include more IoT domains. |
| − | * | + | *MQTT service adapter - receive MQTT messages and push them into OSGi EventAdmin. There is a connection to Eclipse Paho. |
| − | * | + | *CoAP - import CoAP services and export OSGi services (making them available via CoAP). |
| − | * | + | *Liaison with OneM2M- Smart device template, HGI work started and closed last year, but OneM2M took over this work and is continuing it (Deutsche Telekom). Working on an IRP to see how we can use this with OSGi devices that already exist. |
| + | *OneM2M interworking - How to integrate an OSGi environment into a OneM2M ecosystem. Meeting coming up in June and a joint workshop with OneM2M to work out the requirements. | ||
| + | *White paper on security including a testing platform, test several vulnerabilities from an OSGi environment and tells you which rules or best practices to apply. | ||
| + | *Other topics we are trying to push forward: real time Java, for example and specification around OPC-UA. | ||
| + | *Everything is publicly available on GitHub: OSGi design | ||
| − | == | + | === Planning for upcoming IoT Day in London, UK and Ludwigsburg, Germany === |
| + | '''Presenter: Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation''' | ||
| − | + | We are planning two upcoming Eclipse IoT days this fall. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ''' Eclipse IoT Day @ Thingmonk | Sept 11 - London, UK ''' | |
| − | + | We hosted this event for the first time last year and it was great. It’s co-located with Thingmonk (Sept 12-13), a developer conference for people making IoT platforms. | |
| − | * | + | |
| − | ** | + | ''' Eclipse IoT Day @ ECE | Oct 24 - Ludwigsburg, Germany''' |
| − | * | + | Third year we are hosting the event, last year was a success and we hope to make it even better this year. |
| − | + | ||
| − | ** | + | *Monday, Oct 23 - Eclipse IoT WG Meeting |
| − | * | + | Guest speakers |
| + | Project Updates / Intros | ||
| + | Collaboration Topics / Open Whiteboard | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Tuesday, Oct 24 - IoT Day | ||
| + | Various expert speakers | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Wednesday, Oct. 25 - IoT HackDay | ||
| + | Early planning stages | ||
| + | All day event | ||
| + | Hands-on experience Eclipse IoT technology. Opportunity for everyone to learn more about the ecosystem and to connect with other developers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *PC - Volunteers for IoT @ ECE | ||
| + | Thank you to: Istvan Rath, IncQuery Labs & Jens Reimann, Red Hat | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''CFPs are open''' | ||
| + | Propose a talk for ECE IoT day on the EclipseCon Europe website. | ||
| + | Talk ideas for Thingmonk iot@eclipse.org | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Sponsorship''' | ||
| + | Looking for sponsors for both events, email me roxanne@eclipse.org | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Update of sandbox servers for Eclipse IoT projects === | ||
| + | '''Presenter: Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Right now we have 3 active sandbox server services | ||
| + | *MQTT (Mosquitto) | ||
| + | *CoAP (Californium) | ||
| + | *LWM2M (Leshan) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Would be good to have sandboxes for: | ||
| + | '''Kapua (Jens Reimann)''' | ||
| + | *Have one already set-up, but it’s running an old version of Kapua. Missing component is user management, so we need to set that up (create account, etc.). This is planned for the upcoming release so we will wait before updating it since the release is close. Timeframe: around 4 weeks from now. | ||
| + | *We will post this on iot.eclipse.org | ||
| − | '' | + | '''Hono (Kai Hudalla)''' |
| − | + | *Sandbox for hackathon, can we port it? We want to set it up. Main issue is making sure that people can use it and use their devices themselves and also get data from their devices without interfering too much with each other. It’s closely connected to authorization and connection and that is already implemented, but I would like to wait until we have this implemented in a more elegant way. Timeframe: 4-6 weeks | |
| + | *We need access to a VM that already has Docker or Kubernetes support. | ||
| + | *Benjamin will look at whether webmaster can provide a Container Engine setup vs. vanilla Compute Engine VM. | ||
| − | + | '''Unide''' | |
| − | * | + | *The Unide team already has a google machine and will setup their sandbox shortly. |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | === Industry 4.0/Smart Manufacturing White Paper – we would like to start drafting a white paper to describe how Eclipse IoT projects can be used for Industry 4.0 === |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation''' | ||
| − | * | + | *Last white paper (3 stacks) was very successful, pulled together what our community/ecosystem is about and also helped the industry understand what is need to build IoT solutions. |
| − | * | + | *We want to do something similar for Industry 4.0 / Smart Manufacturing, problem, what solutions we need to look at, road map for the future. |
| + | *Volunteers to help with it as subject matter experts | ||
| + | *Process: get a small group of people, draft outline, draft content, working group will review it and provide input. | ||
| + | *Any volunteers? The following individuals volunteered during the call: James Kirkland (Red Hat), Dave Woodard (Eurotech), Dan Gross (Samsung) | ||
| + | *Publish before this before EclipseCon Europe (Oct 24) | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | === Review of Eclipse IoT Open Testbeds Initiative === | |
| − | + | '''Presenter: Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation''' | |
| − | + | *The feedback has been very positive. Helps us talk to the wider industry about what we are doing. | |
| + | *Current testbed (Asset Tracking Management) was launched at Red Hat Summit. Well received and was demoed onsite. Red Hat, Codenvy, Azul Systems, Samsung, Eurotech. Many different demos at the show so people could see data coming in from different assets and view different parts of the demo. All the code is hosted on GitHub and is open source. Users can look at the code and see how it’s running in the gateway and the cloud (leveraging Kapua), check how it’s connected to sensors, etc.) | ||
| + | *Next steps: Improving the documentation for the current Asset Tracking Management Testbed. We would welcome your help to help us review and contribute to the documentation. | ||
| + | *We will be working on other testbeds, the next scenario is around industrial automation / smart manufacturing and leverage other technologies that weren’t necessarily covered in the first testbed. Feat maybe PPMP, OPC-UA, Hono. Work on nice dashboards to see everything like data display and analysis in a nice way. Unide is working on visualization so that could be leveraged with Kapua. | ||
| + | *Benjamin is writing an outline/strawman to visualize how it will look like but please share your ideas and we will collaborate to make all the pieces fit together over the next months. | ||
| − | + | === Review of Eclipse IoT participation in IoT World last week === | |
| + | '''Presenter: Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation''' | ||
| − | + | * It was a great event (about 14,000) in Santa Clara, California on May 16-18 | |
| + | *By far the largest IoT Show in North America and so it means a lot of exposure | ||
| + | *The knowledge of what we are doing continues to rise. People already understand that we do IoT and have been using Kura, MQTT (Paho/Mosquitto) so they are already part of the user community. One person loved hawkBit and said they launched their product with it! | ||
| + | *The show included a lot of vendors (hardware, gateways) there was a lot more talk of edge computing. | ||
| + | *Analytics will becoming equally important so we are trying to encourage vendors to join the WG. | ||
| + | *With Red Hat we had a passport game (Azul, Eurotech and Red Hat) it was effective to get people to all the booths and showed nice collaboration between members | ||
| + | *Testbed approach, people wanted to buy it. UPS and FedEx came up and said it was interesting and got the point that we have technology that they could be using. | ||
| + | *IOTRACKS demoed with us and they were also very busy! They focused on Eclipse ioFog and got great exposure. Keep it in mind for next year, we have a spot for you. | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | ---------------------------------------- | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | == | + | = Archives = |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | * [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2016 Archives]] | |
| − | * | + | * [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2015 Archives]] |
| − | * | + | * [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2014 Archives]] |
| − | * | + | * [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2013 Archives]] |
| − | + | * [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2012 Archives]] | |
| − | * | + | * [[IoT/M2MIWG/Weekly call minutes/2011 Archives]] |
| − | * | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | * | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 10:14, 12 March 2018
The Internet of Things Industry Working Group is holding bi-weekly calls on Tuesday at 17:00CET.
Participation to these calls is restricted to members of the IWG, but the minutes are public. We alternate between marketing-focused calls (upcoming events coordination, community outreach, etc.), and technical calls mostly targeting project leads, to synchronize cross-project activities.
The meetings are held via the Zoom conferencing service. Details to access the meeting are the following:
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: [https://eclipse.zoom.us/j/646159255 ]
Or Telephone:
- Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location)：
- US: +1 646 876 9923 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 408 638 0968
- Canada: +1 647 558 0588
- France: +33 (0) 1 8288 0188
- Germany: +49 (0) 30 3080 6188
- Italy: +39 069 480 6488
- United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 3695 0088
Meeting ID: 646 159 255 International numbers available: [1]
Or iPhone one-tap :
- US: +16468769923,,976345400# or +16699006833,,976345400#
Contents
- 1 Feb 1, 2017 (WG Call)
- 1.1 Participants
- 1.2 Agenda
- 1.2.1 Eclipse IoT Testbeds: review strategy and next steps.
- 1.2.2 2. MQTT 5: Update from Ian Craggs / James Sutton on what’s in MQTT 5 and the expected impact on Eclipse Paho / Mosquitto and downstream adopters.
- 1.2.3 3. PMC topics: project documentation, build machines, Docker, …
- 1.2.4 4. Misc. updates
- 2 Feb 15, 2017 (WG Call)
- 3 Feb 15, 2017 (WG Call)
- 4 Mar 1, 2017 (WG Call)
- 5 Apr 10, 2017 (WG Call)
- 6 Apr 26, 2017 (WG Call)
- 7 May 24, 2017 (WG Call)
- 7.1 Participants
- 7.2 Agenda
- 7.2.1 Update on IoT initiatives at OSGi Alliance - a brief update on the work the OSGi Alliance is doing around IoT
- 7.2.2 Planning for upcoming IoT Day in London, UK and Ludwigsburg, Germany
- 7.2.3 Update of sandbox servers for Eclipse IoT projects
- 7.2.4 Industry 4.0/Smart Manufacturing White Paper – we would like to start drafting a white paper to describe how Eclipse IoT projects can be used for Industry 4.0
- 7.2.5 Review of Eclipse IoT Open Testbeds Initiative
- 7.2.6 Review of Eclipse IoT participation in IoT World last week
- 8 Archives
Feb 1, 2017 (WG Call)
Participants
- Dan Gross, Samsung
- James Sutton, IBM
- David Bericat, Red Hat
- Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ
- Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
- Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
- Brad Micklea, Codenvy
Agenda
Eclipse IoT Testbeds: review strategy and next steps.
Work on a set of industry oriented (vertical solutions) to showcase a technical solution and showcase the Eclipse projects and vendor ecosystem. Eclipse IoT Members working together to set-up the testbed and create a demo that runs 24/7 on the Eclipse servers More details: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nmdi-cmw_O-7W2qZKRHMN-3gw0WHxE75llcV0nMhS-U/edit?usp=sharing Proposed Testbed scenario around Asset Tracking Management: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1KF7yxv5Dnk6b2a574HPtU5pHR5q7wvsT4skKjGDz1Q4/edit?usp=sharing There are many options for collaboration
- Dan Gross: Samsung interested in participating - Kura gateway using ARTIK.
- Laurent Lagosanto: Potential use case for Eclipse Edje.
- David Bericat: Excited and look forward to working with everyone.
Next Steps: Stay tuned, we will be updating the group at large and scheduling individual meetings.
2. MQTT 5: Update from Ian Craggs / James Sutton on what’s in MQTT 5 and the expected impact on Eclipse Paho / Mosquitto and downstream adopters.
Big set of changes:
- Use of the publish/subscribe message pattern which provides one-to-many message distribution and decoupling of applications.
- A messaging transport that is agnostic to the content of the payload.
- Three qualities of service for message delivery:
- At most once", where messages are delivered according to the best efforts of the operating environment. Message loss can occur. This level could be used, for example, with ambient sensor data where it does not matter if an individual reading is lost as the next one will be published soon after.
- At least once", where messages are assured to arrive but duplicates can occur.
- "Exactly once", where messages are assured to arrive exactly once. This level could be used, for example, with billing systems where duplicate or lost messages could lead to incorrect charges being applied.
- A small transport overhead and protocol exchanges minimized to reduce network traffic.
- A mechanism to notify interested parties when an abnormal disconnection occurs.
Notes from the meeting:
- Any request sent (and reply received) can have embedded metadata. This will be used for e.g letting a publisher know about *what* happened to the packet in addition to just acknowledging it
- The CONNECT packet can contain information regarding what QoS are supported by the server
- Supporting QoS 2 on the server is not mandatory anymore
- Scalability
- It will affect the Paho client and so a new Paho client will be created.
- Improve API
- Feedback from community
- Work nicely with the new MQTT 5 features
- The complete move will take a while, MQTT 3 will not go away anytime soon. It will be a parallel process. The previous versions of the client will be maintained. Some users might choose to use MQTT 3 since it’s more lightweight.
IMPORTANT: Get your feedback in as soon as possible, because in a few months it will be finalized, so review the specifications. View working draft 10 dated January 4: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php?num_per_wg=10&wg_abbrev=mqtt
3. PMC topics: project documentation, build machines, Docker, …
Skipped this item - not enough PMC members on the call
4. Misc. updates
- WG Meeting at the Eclipse IoT Day San Jose Add your project for project update or intro: https://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseIoT_SanJose2017
- IoT Developer Survey Test it and give us feedback! It will go live next week. https://www.surveymonkey.net/r/Preview/?sm=PpPJLkX2kyFIkd4FpbfnijKgtSau8CTbzClUcIqMOv8UHpkGU6kxWrpBNJfYHpzC
- Member companies are encouraged to ask for a special link that they can use to promote the survey to their communities, and have access to answers based on this segment.
Open IoT Challenge: we will schedule a live hangout for project leads to answer any technical questions the participant may have. https://iot.eclipse.org/open-iot-challenge/
Feb 15, 2017 (WG Call)
Participants
- Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom
- Jens Reimann, Red Hat
- Dejan Bosanac, Red Hat
- Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI
- Shuai li, CEA-LIST
- Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
- Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
- Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
- Dave Woodard, Eurotech
- Ian Craggs, IBM
- Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS
Agenda
Presentation new project proposal: Eclipse Ditto (Digital Twins)
Presenter: Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI
Bosch will be proposing a new project called “Eclipse Ditto” soon for managing state of Digital Twins. Hopefully the proposal will be made next week. The Ditto Project will be a mediator between IoT Devices and the state of their Digital Twins. Digital Twin is not really a fixed term. Bosch views Digital Twin as is a holistic view of all capabilities and aspects of a device/product asset including its digital representation. Ultimate goal is to use the digital twin as a service. There would be a higher level API to work with individual devices and you wouldn’t have to know what is happening in the background. The plan is to integrate with Eclipse Vorto and Eclipse Kapua.
Read the one-page: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Ditto_Project.png
- Questions:
Can changes to the state be made on the device of the twin, or is it only one way? The state of the device could be in both directions. Changes to the state on the device or the digital twin would change the state of the other one. A twin is not necessarily 1:1 device, a twin can represent many things (device + JVM + …)
Project Proposal: https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-ditto
Presentation by CEA-List on Model Design Environment for IoT
Presenter: Shuai li CEA-List
- Slides: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:S3P-IoTModelingExecution_CEA_Primstech_MicroEJ-final.pdf
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JqAPRH0bfU
- For more details, contact Shuai li from CEA-List.
Update on Testbeds
Presenter Benjamin Cabé
Testbeds aim to showcase the software stack available from our open source projects, as well as the various offers that the WG members provide on top if it (cloud solutions, analytics platforms, hardware, integration services, …).
The first testbed will be a solution for Asset Tracking Management, more specifically tracking the delivery of valuable parcels. The end-to-end solution will comprise embedded sensors that can be attached to the parcels to monitor e.g temperature or vibration, IoT gateways in order to collect the sensor data (for example inside the delivery truck), process it, and report it to a cloud backend where it can be further analyzed, or made available to 3rd party apps. Members currently participating: Red Hat + Eurotech
A wiki page describes the solution https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/Testbeds/Asset_Tracking_Management and will be completed as other members jump on the train to extend the code scenario with their respective solutions. The code to replicate and demonstrate the testbed will be shared through https://github.com/eclipselabs/eclipseiot-testbed-assettracking.
Participation to the testbeds is open to any member of the IoT WG, and more details on the overall strategy are available at https://goo.gl/UeDekI.
Eclipse IoT Day in San Jose and Unconference
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
We’re looking for use-case type speakers to present how their company uses Eclipse IoT projects. Last year at ECE 2016 we had a speaker from the Deutsche Bahn train system explain how Eclipse Paho and MQTT are used in their train systems.
Ideally the speaker would be from the Bay area since this is short notice. Please let us know if you know anyone that could be a good candidate.
Eclipse Leshan Press Release
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
Today, February 15, we issued a press release about Eclipse Leshan and Eclipse Waakama “Eclipse IoT Announces Support for OMA LightweightM2M 1.0 Device Management Standard” Read it here: http://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170215_lwm2m.php
IoT World plans
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
Eclipse IoT will have a booth at IoT World and would like to coordinate with other members. We won’t be doing the pavilion since not enough members wanted to participate, but we will get in touch soon to partner with interested members, such as IOTRACKS, that showed interest in participating.
IoT Developer Survey
Presenter: Roxanne Joncas
On February 7, we launched the third annual IoT Developer Survey. Please take the time to complete the survey and to share it with your coworkers and community.
- Link to promote/share: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/iotsurvey2017eclipseiot
- Graphic for promotion: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Iotsurveypartners.png
Feb 15, 2017 (WG Call)
Participants
- Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom
- Jens Reimann, Red Hat
- Dejan Bosanac, Red Hat
- Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI
- Shuai li, CEA-LIST
- Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
- Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
- Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
- Dave Woodard, Eurotech
- Ian Craggs, IBM
- Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS
Agenda
Presentation new project proposal: Eclipse Ditto (Digital Twins)
Presenter: Gerald Glocker, Bosch SI
Bosch will be proposing a new project called “Eclipse Ditto” soon for managing state of Digital Twins. Hopefully the proposal will be made next week. The Ditto Project will be a mediator between IoT Devices and the state of their Digital Twins. Digital Twin is not really a fixed term. Bosch views Digital Twin as is a holistic view of all capabilities and aspects of a device/product asset including its digital representation. Ultimate goal is to use the digital twin as a service. There would be a higher level API to work with individual devices and you wouldn’t have to know what is happening in the background. The plan is to integrate with Eclipse Vorto and Eclipse Kapua.
Read the one-page: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Ditto_Project.png
- Questions:
Can changes to the state be made on the device of the twin, or is it only one way? The state of the device could be in both directions. Changes to the state on the device or the digital twin would change the state of the other one. A twin is not necessarily 1:1 device, a twin can represent many things (device + JVM + …)
Project Proposal: https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-ditto
Presentation by CEA-List on Model Design Environment for IoT
Presenter: Shuai li CEA-List
- Slides: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:S3P-IoTModelingExecution_CEA_Primstech_MicroEJ-final.pdf
- Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JqAPRH0bfU
- For more details, contact Shuai li from CEA-List.
Update on Testbeds
Presenter Benjamin Cabé
Testbeds aim to showcase the software stack available from our open source projects, as well as the various offers that the WG members provide on top if it (cloud solutions, analytics platforms, hardware, integration services, …).
The first testbed will be a solution for Asset Tracking Management, more specifically tracking the delivery of valuable parcels. The end-to-end solution will comprise embedded sensors that can be attached to the parcels to monitor e.g temperature or vibration, IoT gateways in order to collect the sensor data (for example inside the delivery truck), process it, and report it to a cloud backend where it can be further analyzed, or made available to 3rd party apps. Members currently participating: Red Hat + Eurotech
A wiki page describes the solution https://wiki.eclipse.org/IoT/Testbeds/Asset_Tracking_Management and will be completed as other members jump on the train to extend the code scenario with their respective solutions. The code to replicate and demonstrate the testbed will be shared through https://github.com/eclipselabs/eclipseiot-testbed-assettracking.
Participation to the testbeds is open to any member of the IoT WG, and more details on the overall strategy are available at https://goo.gl/UeDekI.
Eclipse IoT Day in San Jose and Unconference
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
We’re looking for use-case type speakers to present how their company uses Eclipse IoT projects. Last year at ECE 2016 we had a speaker from the Deutsche Bahn train system explain how Eclipse Paho and MQTT are used in their train systems.
Ideally the speaker would be from the Bay area since this is short notice. Please let us know if you know anyone that could be a good candidate.
Eclipse Leshan Press Release
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
Today, February 15, we issued a press release about Eclipse Leshan and Eclipse Waakama “Eclipse IoT Announces Support for OMA LightweightM2M 1.0 Device Management Standard” Read it here: http://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170215_lwm2m.php
IoT World plans
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
Eclipse IoT will have a booth at IoT World and would like to coordinate with other members. We won’t be doing the pavilion since not enough members wanted to participate, but we will get in touch soon to partner with interested members, such as IOTRACKS, that showed interest in participating.
IoT Developer Survey
Presenter: Roxanne Joncas
On February 7, we launched the third annual IoT Developer Survey. Please take the time to complete the survey and to share it with your coworkers and community.
- Link to promote/share: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/iotsurvey2017eclipseiot
- Graphic for promotion: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Iotsurveypartners.png
Mar 1, 2017 (WG Call)
Participants
- Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
- Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
- Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
- Jens Reimann, Red Hat
- György Réthy, Ericsson
- Dave, IOTRACKS
- Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS
- Michael Limprecht, IOTRACKS
- James Sutton, IBM
- Ian Craggs, IBM
- Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ
- Henryk Konsek, Red Hat
- Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom
- Others who joined later
Agenda
Presentation from the Eclipse Titan team at Ericsson
Presenter: György Réthy
Eclipse Titan is a tool built around the TTCN-3 testing standard, and it is very relevant for IoT as it can be used to test MQTT, CoAP, oneM2M, etc. communication scenarios. It was created by Ericsson 15 years ago and has been used internally ever since. It was open sourced 2 years ago at the Eclipse Foundation.
- oneM2MTestter version 1.0 has been released
- No need to learn a new language
- Pilot with CoAP for modeling Testing
Question: Can you execute it in a headless mode? Yes, command line tools is the controller. There are also Eclipse plugins available for test executive that control the command line component.
More information is available in the slides.
Eclipse Foundation Security policy
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
Security is obviously a key concern for IoT so we would like to make sure everyone is familiar with the Security Policy in place at the Eclipse Foundation, and that all projects implement appropriate to let their users know how to report security issues, and know how to handle them.
There is a security team at the Eclipse Foundation, Jens Reimann and Julien Vermillard are on this team to represent IoT.
One of the problems: On Bugzilla, you can mark a bug as private and only the security team will see it and assign it from appropriate project leaders. For projects that use GitHub issues, there isn’t a way to make an issue private. These projects need a link on their site that instructs users to open any security vulnerability bugs on Buzgilla.
All vulnerabilities will eventually need to be made public and the goal is to resolve any vulnerability within *3 months*. After 3 months, the vulnerability will be madepublic.
- Questions can be sent to security@eclipse.org
- Next steps: Ian will talk to Wayne and get more concrete next steps.
- Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xZquUsFDnhxYAdlp8ImXqEueu5IiLFfuOAEPWkQp4Gs/edit?usp=sharing
Eclipse IoT Day in San Jose and Unconference
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
We’re looking for use-case type speakers to present how their company uses Eclipse IoT projects. Last year at ECE 2016 we had a speaker from the Deutsche Bahn train system explain how Eclipse Paho and MQTT are used in their train systems.
Ideally the speaker would be from the Bay area since this is short notice. Please let us know if you know anyone that could be a good candidate.
For the IoT WG Meeting, feel free to suggest guest speakers. We already invited the OMA Group to give an update on LWM2M.
IoT Developer Survey
Presenter: Roxanne Joncas
On February 7, we launched the third annual IoT Developer Survey. Please take the time to complete the survey and to share it with your coworkers and community.
- Link to promote/share: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/iotsurvey2017eclipseiot
- Graphic for promotion: https://wiki.eclipse.org/File:Iotsurveypartners.png
Apr 10, 2017 (WG Call)
Participants
- Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
- Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
- Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
- James Drummond, Codenvy
- Kai Hudalla, Bosch SI
- Kilton Hopkins, IOTRACKS
- Jens Reimann, Red Hat
- Howard Green, Azul Systems
- Thibault Rouffineau, Canonical
- David Bericat, Red Hat
- Dan Gross, Samsung
- Others who joined later
Agenda
Hono Update
Presenter: Kai Hudalla
- 0.5 M6 Milestone of Hono released this week.
- 3-4 weeks in between each release. It’s about continuously improving the system. Working on the telemetry system right now. Stability and resilience has improved, when services fail - how do they reconnect and start working without manual interference.
- Hackathon in Berlin at Bosch Connected World. Over 100 devices connected to a Hono instance to provide an API and build their solution on top of that. It was pretty successful. It was great because they users could focus on how to use the data, instead of how to connect.
- Finish up the remaining work around security and authorization to have a first 0.5 release with the full telemetry implementation ready in the summer.
- Rest + MQTT Adapter and custom ones to connect to LORA 1, but this one not standardized. Bosch camera (HTTP, but not RESTful).
Review IoT Developer Survey Results
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
- Why isn’t automotive a top industry?
- Hard to get customers to buy in to the security
- It’s not cheap, and no one wants to pay for it
- If it’s a feature, it’s taken for granted
- We would have to check Node.js and JavaScript (in future remove Node.js)
- Discrepancy between Linux and ARM on constrained devices - people seem to have answered they run Linux on constrained devices while the dominant architecture seems to be very constrained ARM Cortex-M architectures.
- Slide #32 Security Boot to Secured boot
Report: https://ianskerrett.wordpress.com/2017/04/19/iot-developer-trends-2017-edition/ Slides: https://www.slideshare.net/IanSkerrett/iot-developer-survey-2017
Proposal to Re-start IoT WG Steering Committee
Presenter: Ian Skerrett
- Purpose of the Steering Committee: To provide executive-level strategy, review, and oversight to the Eclipse IoT Working Group.
- Why do we need a steering committee? Who would be on the steering committee.
- Highly debated during the call, you can follow the discussion on the IoT-WG mailing list.
Details: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jBYPe1bojxvX3aka2fKk1FAGfmghIV284NK4ttiWucw/edit?usp=sharing
Update of Eclipse IoT Open Testbeds
Presenter: Benjamin Cabé
- Testbeds are doing great and will be announced in two weeks prior to the Red Hat Summit in Boston, May 2-4.
- We will be hosting more testbeds in the future and every working group member is invited to participate or propose one.
Apr 26, 2017 (WG Call)
Participants
- Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
- Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
- Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
- Dejan Bosanac, Red Hat
- Mick Limprecht, IOTRACKS
- Kai Hudalla, Bosch SI
- James Kirkland, Red Hat
- Jens Reimann, Red Hat
- Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ
- David Bericat, Red Hat
- Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom
- Others who joined later
Agenda
Testbed Update - Benjamin Cabé
- New open IoT Testbed will be announced tomorrow
- Demo system and implementation of the testbed, Red Hat, Eurotech, Samsung, Azul Systems and Codenvy collaborated on an Asset Tracking Testbed. It features, Eclipse Kura, Eclipse Kapua, Eclipse Che, Samsung ARTIK and OpenShift.
Announcement: https://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170426_iottestbeds.php
Testbed on Eclipse IoT: https://iot.eclipse.org/testbeds/
Asset Tracking Testbed: https://iot.eclipse.org/testbeds/asset-tracking/
Benjamin’s blog post: https://blog.benjamin-cabe.com/2017/04/27/unveiling-the-eclipse-iot-open-testbeds
Security policies for IoT projects - Jens Reimann
We have been doing some work on the security policies.
Changes:
- New projects should know that there are security policies at the Eclipse Foundation
- Encourage projects to put a link directing users to detailed information to report security issues against Eclipse IoT projects.
- New mandatory field = reporting security issues for Eclipse IoT projects in the release review. If there are none, just say none, but if there are just list them. If you can’t list them right away, you can just put the bugzilla link that is not publicly viewable to users.
- We will write this new information down so new and existing projects know how to do it and will send an email to inform projects how to proceed
Update on a new IoT WG charter and Steering Committee - Ian Skerrett
- With each Working Group at the Eclipse Foundation, there is a steering committee that helps make decisions. We used to have one when the working group was called M2M, but it didn’t work out for many reasons. We would like to relaunch it to make sure that the things we are producing are in agreement with what the overall community wants.
- We need to define roles and responsibilities in the charter.
- If the community doesn’t agree on something eventually the Steering Committee can help.
Plans for IoT World - Roxanne Joncas
- Booth at the event, demoing the testbeds and Eclipse IoT Projects
- If you’d like to demo, just let us know!
IoT Day in London and Munich - Ian Skerrett
- Eclipse IoT Day @ThingMonk will take place September 11 in London, UK http://thingmonk.com/
- Should we do an IoT Day in Munich the week of Sept 11? General consensus is not to have an Eclipse IoT Munich is too close to ECE in September, maybe in February or have a presence in Spain.
May 24, 2017 (WG Call)
Participants
- Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
- Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
- Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
- Kai Hudalla, Bosch SI
- Kai Hackbarth, Bosch
- Laurent Lagosanto, MicroEJ
- James Sutton
- Kai Kreuzer, Deutsche Telekom
- Jens Reimann, Red Hat
- James Kirkland, Red Hat
[ other people joined in late, feel free to add your name :-) ]
Agenda
Update on IoT initiatives at OSGi Alliance - a brief update on the work the OSGi Alliance is doing around IoT
Presenter: Kai Hackbarth, Bosch
OSGI IoT expert group started in 2015, before that there was a resident expert group focusing more on smart home, but we wanted to make it broader and include more IoT domains.
- MQTT service adapter - receive MQTT messages and push them into OSGi EventAdmin. There is a connection to Eclipse Paho.
- CoAP - import CoAP services and export OSGi services (making them available via CoAP).
- Liaison with OneM2M- Smart device template, HGI work started and closed last year, but OneM2M took over this work and is continuing it (Deutsche Telekom). Working on an IRP to see how we can use this with OSGi devices that already exist.
- OneM2M interworking - How to integrate an OSGi environment into a OneM2M ecosystem. Meeting coming up in June and a joint workshop with OneM2M to work out the requirements.
- White paper on security including a testing platform, test several vulnerabilities from an OSGi environment and tells you which rules or best practices to apply.
- Other topics we are trying to push forward: real time Java, for example and specification around OPC-UA.
- Everything is publicly available on GitHub: OSGi design
Planning for upcoming IoT Day in London, UK and Ludwigsburg, Germany
Presenter: Roxanne Joncas, Eclipse Foundation
We are planning two upcoming Eclipse IoT days this fall.
Eclipse IoT Day @ Thingmonk | Sept 11 - London, UK We hosted this event for the first time last year and it was great. It’s co-located with Thingmonk (Sept 12-13), a developer conference for people making IoT platforms.
Eclipse IoT Day @ ECE | Oct 24 - Ludwigsburg, Germany Third year we are hosting the event, last year was a success and we hope to make it even better this year.
- Monday, Oct 23 - Eclipse IoT WG Meeting
Guest speakers Project Updates / Intros Collaboration Topics / Open Whiteboard
- Tuesday, Oct 24 - IoT Day
Various expert speakers
- Wednesday, Oct. 25 - IoT HackDay
Early planning stages All day event Hands-on experience Eclipse IoT technology. Opportunity for everyone to learn more about the ecosystem and to connect with other developers.
- PC - Volunteers for IoT @ ECE
Thank you to: Istvan Rath, IncQuery Labs & Jens Reimann, Red Hat
CFPs are open Propose a talk for ECE IoT day on the EclipseCon Europe website. Talk ideas for Thingmonk iot@eclipse.org
Sponsorship Looking for sponsors for both events, email me roxanne@eclipse.org
Update of sandbox servers for Eclipse IoT projects
Presenter: Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
Right now we have 3 active sandbox server services
- MQTT (Mosquitto)
- CoAP (Californium)
- LWM2M (Leshan)
Would be good to have sandboxes for: Kapua (Jens Reimann)
- Have one already set-up, but it’s running an old version of Kapua. Missing component is user management, so we need to set that up (create account, etc.). This is planned for the upcoming release so we will wait before updating it since the release is close. Timeframe: around 4 weeks from now.
- We will post this on iot.eclipse.org
Hono (Kai Hudalla)
- Sandbox for hackathon, can we port it? We want to set it up. Main issue is making sure that people can use it and use their devices themselves and also get data from their devices without interfering too much with each other. It’s closely connected to authorization and connection and that is already implemented, but I would like to wait until we have this implemented in a more elegant way. Timeframe: 4-6 weeks
- We need access to a VM that already has Docker or Kubernetes support.
- Benjamin will look at whether webmaster can provide a Container Engine setup vs. vanilla Compute Engine VM.
Unide
- The Unide team already has a google machine and will setup their sandbox shortly.
Industry 4.0/Smart Manufacturing White Paper – we would like to start drafting a white paper to describe how Eclipse IoT projects can be used for Industry 4.0
Presenter: Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
- Last white paper (3 stacks) was very successful, pulled together what our community/ecosystem is about and also helped the industry understand what is need to build IoT solutions.
- We want to do something similar for Industry 4.0 / Smart Manufacturing, problem, what solutions we need to look at, road map for the future.
- Volunteers to help with it as subject matter experts
- Process: get a small group of people, draft outline, draft content, working group will review it and provide input.
- Any volunteers? The following individuals volunteered during the call: James Kirkland (Red Hat), Dave Woodard (Eurotech), Dan Gross (Samsung)
- Publish before this before EclipseCon Europe (Oct 24)
Review of Eclipse IoT Open Testbeds Initiative
Presenter: Benjamin Cabé, Eclipse Foundation
- The feedback has been very positive. Helps us talk to the wider industry about what we are doing.
- Current testbed (Asset Tracking Management) was launched at Red Hat Summit. Well received and was demoed onsite. Red Hat, Codenvy, Azul Systems, Samsung, Eurotech. Many different demos at the show so people could see data coming in from different assets and view different parts of the demo. All the code is hosted on GitHub and is open source. Users can look at the code and see how it’s running in the gateway and the cloud (leveraging Kapua), check how it’s connected to sensors, etc.)
- Next steps: Improving the documentation for the current Asset Tracking Management Testbed. We would welcome your help to help us review and contribute to the documentation.
- We will be working on other testbeds, the next scenario is around industrial automation / smart manufacturing and leverage other technologies that weren’t necessarily covered in the first testbed. Feat maybe PPMP, OPC-UA, Hono. Work on nice dashboards to see everything like data display and analysis in a nice way. Unide is working on visualization so that could be leveraged with Kapua.
- Benjamin is writing an outline/strawman to visualize how it will look like but please share your ideas and we will collaborate to make all the pieces fit together over the next months.
Review of Eclipse IoT participation in IoT World last week
Presenter: Ian Skerrett, Eclipse Foundation
- It was a great event (about 14,000) in Santa Clara, California on May 16-18
- By far the largest IoT Show in North America and so it means a lot of exposure
- The knowledge of what we are doing continues to rise. People already understand that we do IoT and have been using Kura, MQTT (Paho/Mosquitto) so they are already part of the user community. One person loved hawkBit and said they launched their product with it!
- The show included a lot of vendors (hardware, gateways) there was a lot more talk of edge computing.
- Analytics will becoming equally important so we are trying to encourage vendors to join the WG.
- With Red Hat we had a passport game (Azul, Eurotech and Red Hat) it was effective to get people to all the booths and showed nice collaboration between members
- Testbed approach, people wanted to buy it. UPS and FedEx came up and said it was interesting and got the point that we have technology that they could be using.
- IOTRACKS demoed with us and they were also very busy! They focused on Eclipse ioFog and got great exposure. Keep it in mind for next year, we have a spot for you.