Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "IDE/Criticism"
< IDE
m |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
**"No doubt Intellij’s plugin [for SVN & Git] is more reliable, has better GUI and easier to use." | **"No doubt Intellij’s plugin [for SVN & Git] is more reliable, has better GUI and easier to use." | ||
*[French] http://www.developpez.net/forums/d1363765-2/general-developpement/debats-developpement-best-of/quel-est-votre-environnement-developpement-edi-prefere-en-2013/#post7408401 | *[French] http://www.developpez.net/forums/d1363765-2/general-developpement/debats-developpement-best-of/quel-est-votre-environnement-developpement-edi-prefere-en-2013/#post7408401 | ||
− | * | + | ** Eclipse doesn't support Maven Out-of-the-box '''Solution?''' Make m2eclipse available by default in Java IDE package, seems to be the case since Kepler... |
− | * | + | ** JPA support is better in IntelliJ |
*[French] http://www.developpez.net/forums/d1363765-2/general-developpement/debats-developpement-best-of/quel-est-votre-environnement-developpement-edi-prefere-en-2013/#post7408095 | *[French] http://www.developpez.net/forums/d1363765-2/general-developpement/debats-developpement-best-of/quel-est-votre-environnement-developpement-edi-prefere-en-2013/#post7408095 | ||
**Eclipse too slow '''Solution?''' Profiling and fixing perf bottlenecks | **Eclipse too slow '''Solution?''' Profiling and fixing perf bottlenecks |
Revision as of 12:28, 30 July 2013
This page aims at listing criticism that is often heard from end-users about Eclipse when comparing IDEs. This can become a list of top priority issues from an end-user POV.
For a better use, this page should contain no judgment from Eclipse contributors. People can discuss on related Bugzilla entries.
- http://www.ihateeclipse.com/
Eclipse says that you need to refresh (with F5) whereas it could refresh automatically.- This is fixed since Juno SR1.
- Default preference settings are not very adapted.
- ...Follow link for exhaustive list...
- http://developer4life.blogspot.de/2012/01/intellij-vs-eclipse.html
- "The default code completion and assistance in Intellij is faster and better."
- "If you are a rookie developer, Intellij can improve your code. Solution? Stricter checkstyle? Integrate FindBugs by default?
- "Intellij user experience is much easier to grasp."
- "No doubt Intellij’s plugin [for SVN & Git] is more reliable, has better GUI and easier to use."
- [French] http://www.developpez.net/forums/d1363765-2/general-developpement/debats-developpement-best-of/quel-est-votre-environnement-developpement-edi-prefere-en-2013/#post7408401
- Eclipse doesn't support Maven Out-of-the-box Solution? Make m2eclipse available by default in Java IDE package, seems to be the case since Kepler...
- JPA support is better in IntelliJ
- [French] http://www.developpez.net/forums/d1363765-2/general-developpement/debats-developpement-best-of/quel-est-votre-environnement-developpement-edi-prefere-en-2013/#post7408095
- Eclipse too slow Solution? Profiling and fixing perf bottlenecks
- Eclipse freezes too often Solution Avoid delivering bugs ;)
- Eclipse is not ergonomic
- Not beautiful Solution? A nicer theme out-of-the-box
- [French] http://www.developpez.net/forums/d1363765-2/general-developpement/debats-developpement-best-of/quel-est-votre-environnement-developpement-edi-prefere-en-2013/#post7408401
- Eclipse editor doesn't link to external resources compared to IntelliJ. Example: IntelliJ can automatically open an XML file from a Java field...)
- Eclipse doesn't have inner language completion (completion for an XPath expression inside Java code) compared to IntelliJ
- Java completion in IntelliJ matches context.
- Java completion in IntelliJ understands camel-case
obj.mM
matchesobj.myMethod
) Solution? Make complation forobj.xyz
actually matchobj.x*y*z