Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "Higgins/ModelAPIs"

m (logo, category, left menu)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
# They are 'fixed' in nature.  The only way to represent extra information about the model of context elements is to revise these interfaces.  For example, say there's a need to associate an image with the attribute called “http://example.com/some/name/space#telephoneNumber” (this image might be used by a management UI).  To make that association we need a new method like IAttributeModel.getManagementImage().   
 
# They are 'fixed' in nature.  The only way to represent extra information about the model of context elements is to revise these interfaces.  For example, say there's a need to associate an image with the attribute called “http://example.com/some/name/space#telephoneNumber” (this image might be used by a management UI).  To make that association we need a new method like IAttributeModel.getManagementImage().   
 
## Even if we felt like it's ok to revise the current I*Model interfaces, we do not know what kinds of information will need to be associated with the models of elements in a context.  It may be the case that some people will have needs that we think are unworthy of revising the interfaces for.  For example, say someone wants to associate an astrological symbol to each different attribute model.  Does that mean we should add a new IAttributeModel.getAstrologicalSymbol()?
 
## Even if we felt like it's ok to revise the current I*Model interfaces, we do not know what kinds of information will need to be associated with the models of elements in a context.  It may be the case that some people will have needs that we think are unworthy of revising the interfaces for.  For example, say someone wants to associate an astrological symbol to each different attribute model.  Does that mean we should add a new IAttributeModel.getAstrologicalSymbol()?
# There is no way to update a context's model.  We have a need to be able to add models for new node types, attribute types and so-on. We also need to be able to change existing models (such as changing the cardinality of an attribute).  Also, we may need to remove models.
+
# There is no way to update a context's model.  We have a need to be able to add models for new entity types, attribute types and so-on. We also need to be able to change existing models (such as changing the cardinality of an attribute).  Also, we may need to remove models.
 
# We cannot look up a model with partial information.  For example, say I know there's an attribute with the word "telephoneNumber" in its ID, but I don't know the entire ID.  It would be nice to be able to have a way to find what I need without enumerating through the entire set of attribute models.
 
# We cannot look up a model with partial information.  For example, say I know there's an attribute with the word "telephoneNumber" in its ID, but I don't know the entire ID.  It would be nice to be able to have a way to find what I need without enumerating through the entire set of attribute models.
  
 
=Proposal=
 
=Proposal=
It may be better to move away from the existing special interfaces for the purpose of defining the model of elements, but instead simply re-use the existing interfaces that are used to access normal information within a Context (nodes and their attributes).
+
It may be better to move away from the existing special interfaces for the purpose of defining the model of elements, but instead simply re-use the existing interfaces that are used to access normal information within a Context (entities and their attributes).
  
Following is a proposal which shows how these model nodes might look.  To illustrate the proposal, we start by showing how an instance of a person looks (nothing new) and then examining the model nodes that govern instances of nodes and attributes:
+
Following is a proposal which shows how these model entities might look.  To illustrate the proposal, we start by showing how an instance of a person looks (nothing new) and then examining the model entities that govern instances of entities and attributes:
  
 
==A person==
 
==A person==
Example of an instance of a person node.
+
Example of an instance of a person entity.
* Java type: some impl of INode. The context provider implements this class
+
* Java type: some impl of IEntity. The context provider implements this class
* getNodeID() returns: the contextually unique ID for this person
+
* getEntityID() returns: the contextually unique ID for this person
 
* getAttributes() returns: typical attributes about this person (things like a homeAddress and phoneNumber)
 
* getAttributes() returns: typical attributes about this person (things like a homeAddress and phoneNumber)
* getType() returns: an identifier for this person's model node.  assume it's called “http://example.com/some/name/space#Person”
+
* getType() returns: an identifier for this person's model entity.  assume it's called “http://example.com/some/name/space#Person”
* getTypeNode() returns: some impl of INode, assume it returns a PersonModel.class
+
* getTypeEntity() returns: some impl of IEntity, assume it returns a PersonModel.class
  
 
==A person's model==
 
==A person's model==
Now, say we look at the “person model” node we saw above (we got this either by calling INode.getTypeNode(), or INode.getType() followed by IContext.getNode(NodeID)), we see (NOTE: this node is a model element):
+
Now, say we look at the “person model” entity we saw above (we got this either by calling IEntity.getTypeEntity(), or IEntity.getType() followed by IContext.getEntity(EntityID)), we see (NOTE: this entity is a model element):
* Java type: some impl of INode – This is implemented by the context provider.  We can assume it's a PersonModel.class.
+
* Java type: some impl of IEntity – This is implemented by the context provider.  We can assume it's a PersonModel.class.
* getNodeID() returns: the contextually unique ID for this node.  This is the same value we got when calling INode.getType() on the person instance above, so in this case it would be “http://example.com/some/name/space#Person”.
+
* getEntityID() returns: the contextually unique ID for this entity.  This is the same value we got when calling IEntity.getType() on the person instance above, so in this case it would be “http://example.com/some/name/space#Person”.
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following and other attributes:
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following and other attributes:
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes:  This attribute has values which are pointers to various attribute model nodes.  For example, a value might point at the “http://example.com/some/name/space#telephoneNumber” attribute model node, and another one might point at the “http://example.com/some/name/space#homeAddress” attribute model node.
+
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes:  This attribute has values which are pointers to various attribute model entities.  For example, a value might point at the “http://example.com/some/name/space#telephoneNumber” attribute model entity, and another one might point at the “http://example.com/some/name/space#homeAddress” attribute model entity.
*** Note that the full list of valid attributes for this type of node must be discovered by looking at this list as well as the list of all this node model's supertypes.  We can talk about possible shortcuts to get them all at once.
+
*** Note that the full list of valid attributes for this type of entity must be discovered by looking at this list as well as the list of all this entity model's supertypes.  We can talk about possible shortcuts to get them all at once.
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#supertype:  This attribute would point at another node model node.  If person is derived from something like “http://example.com/some/name/space#Mammal” it would point at that.  If person is at the top of it's node type hierarchy in this context, this attribute would point at a well-known node model node that defines INode in general (that would be called “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#Node”)
+
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#supertype:  This attribute would point at another entity model entity.  If person is derived from something like “http://example.com/some/name/space#Mammal” it would point at that.  If person is at the top of it's entity type hierarchy in this context, this attribute would point at a well-known entity model entity that defines IEntity in general (that would be called “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#Entity”)
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#NodeModel”
+
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#EntityModel”
* getTypeNode() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#NodeModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
+
* getTypeEntity() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#EntityModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
  
==The "top" node model==
+
==The "top" entity model==
Ok, now let's look at the instance of the node called “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#Node”.  This is simply the top-level model definition for all node model hierarchies.  Thus it contains model definitions for things common to all nodes:
+
Ok, now let's look at the instance of the entity called “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#Entity”.  This is simply the top-level model definition for all entity model hierarchies.  Thus it contains model definitions for things common to all entities:
* Java type: an impl of INode (maybe we'll call it Node.class).  This is implemented by Higgins and is always the same
+
* Java type: an impl of IEntity (maybe we'll call it Entity.class).  This is implemented by Higgins and is always the same
* getNodeID() returns: the unique ID for this node.  This is “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#Node”
+
* getEntityID() returns: the unique ID for this entity.  This is “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#Entity”
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes:  Only one value exists at this point, and that is “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#NodeID”
+
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes:  Only one value exists at this point, and that is “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#EntityID”
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#NodeModel”
+
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#EntityModel”
* getTypeNode() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#NodeModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
+
* getTypeEntity() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#EntityModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
  
==The model for node models==
+
==The model for entity models==
What defines a node model node?  This does:
+
What defines an entity model entity?  This does:
* Java type: an impl of INode.  Higgins will provide a default class called NodeModel.class, but a context provider is free to return its own (which may or may not be a subclass of the Higgins NodeModel.class), as long as it contains the “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes” and its values mentioned below.  A context provider is free to add more values to the “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes” attribute.
+
* Java type: an impl of IEntity.  Higgins will provide a default class called EntityModel.class, but a context provider is free to return its own (which may or may not be a subclass of the Higgins EntityModel.class), as long as it contains the “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes” and its values mentioned below.  A context provider is free to add more values to the “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes” attribute.
* getNodeID() returns: the unique ID for this node.  This is “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#NodeModel”
+
* getEntityID() returns: the unique ID for this entity.  This is “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#EntityModel”
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
 
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes:  These values exists here (note that a context provider may add to this set of values):
 
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes:  These values exists here (note that a context provider may add to this set of values):
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes”
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes”
**** Note there's a subtlety here that may look confusing.  The attribute is called attributeTypes and this value is also called attributeTypes.  What we're saying is that this model (which defines what it means to be a node model – really a node model model to be precise) specifies that instances (like the model for person, or organization) can have an attribute called attributeTypes.  We could rename this value to something like “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#nodeAttributeTypes” if that would make it more clear.
+
**** Note there's a subtlety here that may look confusing.  The attribute is called attributeTypes and this value is also called attributeTypes.  What we're saying is that this model (which defines what it means to be an entity model – really an entity model model to be precise) specifies that instances (like the model for person, or organization) can have an attribute called attributeTypes.  We could rename this value to something like “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#entityAttributeTypes” if that would make it more clear.
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#supertype”
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#supertype”
 
**** This says that instances (like the model for person, or organization) can have an attribute called supertype.   
 
**** This says that instances (like the model for person, or organization) can have an attribute called supertype.   
 
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”
 
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”
* getTypeNode() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
+
* getTypeEntity() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
 
** alternately, this could be null if we just tell people there is no such thing and teach them conceptually what it is.
 
** alternately, this could be null if we just tell people there is no such thing and teach them conceptually what it is.
  
 
==The model for model elements==
 
==The model for model elements==
 
Finally, here's the model for model elements:
 
Finally, here's the model for model elements:
* Java type: an impl of INode called ModelModel.  This is implemented by Higgins and is always the same.
+
* Java type: an impl of IEntity called ModelModel.  This is implemented by Higgins and is always the same.
* getNodeID() returns: the unique ID for this node.  This is “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”
+
* getEntityID() returns: the unique ID for this entity.  This is “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
 
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes:  This only has:
 
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes:  This only has:
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes”
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes”
**** This says that instances (the nodes for NodeModel,  attributeModel, and valueModel) have an attribute called attributeTypes
+
**** This says that instances (the entities for EntityModel,  attributeModel, and valueModel) have an attribute called attributeTypes
 
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”
 
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”
* getTypeNode() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
+
* getTypeEntity() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
Note the recursive nature of getType and getTypeNode above.  We could instead return null or throw some well-known exception.
+
Note the recursive nature of getType and getTypeEntity above.  We could instead return null or throw some well-known exception.
  
 
==An attribute model==
 
==An attribute model==
 
Now for fun, let's look at an attribute's model, and follow that.  We'll take the example of “http://example.com/some/name/space#homeAddress”:
 
Now for fun, let's look at an attribute's model, and follow that.  We'll take the example of “http://example.com/some/name/space#homeAddress”:
* Java type: an impl of INode. This is created by the context provider.
+
* Java type: an impl of IEntity. This is created by the context provider.
* getNodeID() returns: the unique ID for this node.  In this case it's “http://example.com/some/name/space#homeAddress”
+
* getEntityID() returns: the unique ID for this entity.  In this case it's “http://example.com/some/name/space#homeAddress”
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#valueTypes:  Each value would be the identifier of a model node which represents a permitted data type for the value(s) of attribute instances that this attribute model defines.  An example might be ** ** “http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string ”, but could also point at any other value model.
+
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#valueTypes:  Each value would be the identifier of a model entity which represents a permitted data type for the value(s) of attribute instances that this attribute model defines.  An example might be ** ** “http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string ”, but could also point at any other value model.
 
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#maxCardinality: holds a value which represents the maximum values that can be placed on instances of attributes that this attribute model defines.
 
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#maxCardinality: holds a value which represents the maximum values that can be placed on instances of attributes that this attribute model defines.
 
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#minCardinality: holds a value which represents the minimum values that can be placed on instances of attributes that this attribute model defines.
 
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#minCardinality: holds a value which represents the minimum values that can be placed on instances of attributes that this attribute model defines.
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#supertype:  This attribute would point at another attribute model node.  If homeAddress is derived from something like “http://example.com/some/name/space#postalAddress” it would point at that.  If homeAddress is at the top of it's node type hierarchy in this context, this attribute would point at a well-known attribute model node that defines IAttributes in general (assume that would be called “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#TopAttribute”)
+
** http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#supertype:  This attribute would point at another attribute model entity.  If homeAddress is derived from something like “http://example.com/some/name/space#postalAddress” it would point at that.  If homeAddress is at the top of it's entity type hierarchy in this context, this attribute would point at a well-known attribute model entity that defines IAttributes in general (assume that would be called “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#TopAttribute”)
 
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel”
 
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel”
* getTypeNode() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
+
* getTypeEntity() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
  
 
==The model for attribute models==
 
==The model for attribute models==
And here's that the node identified by “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel” looks like:
+
And here's that the entity identified by “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel” looks like:
* Java type: an impl of INode.  Higgins will provide a default class called AttributeModel.class, but a context provider is free to return its own (which may or may not be a subclass of the Higgins AttributeModel.class), as long as it contains the “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes” and its values mentioned below.  A context provider is free to add more values to the “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes” attribute.
+
* Java type: an impl of IEntity.  Higgins will provide a default class called AttributeModel.class, but a context provider is free to return its own (which may or may not be a subclass of the Higgins AttributeModel.class), as long as it contains the “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes” and its values mentioned below.  A context provider is free to add more values to the “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes” attribute.
* getNodeID() returns: the unique ID for this node.  This is http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel”
+
* getEntityID() returns: the unique ID for this entity.  This is http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel”
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
 
* getAttributes() returns: the following attributes:
** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes”:  These values represent the types of attributes allowed on an attribute model node (note that a context provider may add to this set of values):
+
** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#attributeTypes”:  These values represent the types of attributes allowed on an attribute model entity (note that a context provider may add to this set of values):
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#valueTypes”
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#valueTypes”
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#maxCardinality”
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#maxCardinality”
Line 90: Line 90:
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#supertype”
 
*** “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#supertype”
 
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”
 
* getType() returns: the well-known identifier “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”
* getTypeNode() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
+
* getTypeEntity() returns: an implementation of “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#ModelModel”.  This object would be implemented by Higgins and thus would be the same for all context providers.
  
Then of course we have value models.  Again from the bottom-up, here's a node that describes a value type called <TODO: finish this>
+
Then of course we have value models.  Again from the bottom-up, here's an entity that describes a value type called <TODO: finish this>
  
<TODO need to be able to specify min/max cardinality on each attributeType associated with a specific node model so we can preserve the ability to say "person nodes must have at least one surname attribute value, and may have a telephone number" without causing all instances of surname to be min=1
+
<TODO need to be able to specify min/max cardinality on each attributeType associated with a specific entity model so we can preserve the ability to say "person entities must have at least one surname attribute value, and may have a telephone number" without causing all instances of surname to be min=1
  
 
[[Category:Higgins IdAS]]
 
[[Category:Higgins IdAS]]

Revision as of 14:47, 20 May 2008

{{#eclipseproject:technology.higgins}}

Higgins logo 76Wx100H.jpg

Problem

Today, IdAS defines a set of special interfaces for accessing a context's model elements. There are a number of problems with these interfaces:

  1. They are 'fixed' in nature. The only way to represent extra information about the model of context elements is to revise these interfaces. For example, say there's a need to associate an image with the attribute called “http://example.com/some/name/space#telephoneNumber” (this image might be used by a management UI). To make that association we need a new method like IAttributeModel.getManagementImage().
    1. Even if we felt like it's ok to revise the current I*Model interfaces, we do not know what kinds of information will need to be associated with the models of elements in a context. It may be the case that some people will have needs that we think are unworthy of revising the interfaces for. For example, say someone wants to associate an astrological symbol to each different attribute model. Does that mean we should add a new IAttributeModel.getAstrologicalSymbol()?
  2. There is no way to update a context's model. We have a need to be able to add models for new entity types, attribute types and so-on. We also need to be able to change existing models (such as changing the cardinality of an attribute). Also, we may need to remove models.
  3. We cannot look up a model with partial information. For example, say I know there's an attribute with the word "telephoneNumber" in its ID, but I don't know the entire ID. It would be nice to be able to have a way to find what I need without enumerating through the entire set of attribute models.

Proposal

It may be better to move away from the existing special interfaces for the purpose of defining the model of elements, but instead simply re-use the existing interfaces that are used to access normal information within a Context (entities and their attributes).

Following is a proposal which shows how these model entities might look. To illustrate the proposal, we start by showing how an instance of a person looks (nothing new) and then examining the model entities that govern instances of entities and attributes:

A person

Example of an instance of a person entity.

  • Java type: some impl of IEntity. The context provider implements this class
  • getEntityID() returns: the contextually unique ID for this person
  • getAttributes() returns: typical attributes about this person (things like a homeAddress and phoneNumber)
  • getType() returns: an identifier for this person's model entity. assume it's called “http://example.com/some/name/space#Person”
  • getTypeEntity() returns: some impl of IEntity, assume it returns a PersonModel.class

A person's model

Now, say we look at the “person model” entity we saw above (we got this either by calling IEntity.getTypeEntity(), or IEntity.getType() followed by IContext.getEntity(EntityID)), we see (NOTE: this entity is a model element):

The "top" entity model

Ok, now let's look at the instance of the entity called “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#Entity”. This is simply the top-level model definition for all entity model hierarchies. Thus it contains model definitions for things common to all entities:

The model for entity models

What defines an entity model entity? This does:

The model for model elements

Finally, here's the model for model elements:

Note the recursive nature of getType and getTypeEntity above. We could instead return null or throw some well-known exception.

An attribute model

Now for fun, let's look at an attribute's model, and follow that. We'll take the example of “http://example.com/some/name/space#homeAddress”:

The model for attribute models

And here's that the entity identified by “http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/ontologies/2006/higgins#AttributeModel” looks like:

Then of course we have value models. Again from the bottom-up, here's an entity that describes a value type called <TODO: finish this>

<TODO need to be able to specify min/max cardinality on each attributeType associated with a specific entity model so we can preserve the ability to say "person entities must have at least one surname attribute value, and may have a telephone number" without causing all instances of surname to be min=1

Copyright © Eclipse Foundation, Inc. All Rights Reserved.