Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

G-Eclipse/Meeting Minutes/2009-03-31

< G-Eclipse‎ | Meeting Minutes
Revision as of 11:29, 31 March 2009 by Garcia.iwr.fzk.de (Talk | contribs) (Action Items)

Meeting Title: g-Eclipse Conference Call
Date & Time: Tuesday Mar 31, 2009 at 1500 UTC / 0700 SFO / 1000 NYC / 1500 London / 1600 Berlin
Dial-in: The conference calls are open to the public, and we invite everyone to participate. All you need is an Internet connection, the EVO software, and a EVO user id. You can get everything you need at evo.caltech.edu.

Attendees

  • Thomas Koeckerbauer
  • Sylva Girtelschmid
  • Ariel Garcia

Regrets

  • TBD

Topics

  • SSH plugins (SFTP) - probably 2 bundles
    • Ariel will open CQ
    • Thomas uploaded the code in Bug #266987
  • gz compression for Java
    • (used in the traceviewer, known errors in standard JVM implementation, better open source implementation available from Jcraft)
    • Thomas did a plugin (in CVS)
    • Ariel will check the license etc and open a CQ
  • Gilda infrastructure
    • Sylva using it for lectures at Linz
    • Some sites failing, Ariel contacted them
    • Thomas will do a tutorial at LRZ on 29 April
  • Thomas presented g-Eclipse in monthly meeting at LRZ
    • main issue reported by attendees was missing GT4 support
    • good chances that Munich will work on GT4 support
    • Ariel also did some initial skeleton stuff
  • Patches for the workflow editor?
    • Ariel applied the missing one
  • Thomas tested gEclipse with Galileo,
    • only workflow component not compiling (due to EMF)

Reminders

  • TBD

Additional Topics

  • ...

Action Items

  • CQs for ssh plugins and jzlib, Ariel

Carry over items

  • JSDL Editor into its own installable feature?
  • Data management performance. - Mateusz!
  • Email by Piter de Boer (uva.nl) on 25.2.09 regarding LFC reuse and bugfixing, see http://www.science.uva.nl/~ptdeboer/lfc/ . Did we react to that email, and profit from his fixes?

Back to the top