Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "G-Eclipse/Meeting Minutes/2009-02-24"
< G-Eclipse | Meeting Minutes
(→Attendees) |
m (→Action Items) |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Nicholas Loulloudes | * Nicholas Loulloudes | ||
* David Johnson | * David Johnson | ||
+ | * Sylva Girtelschmid | ||
=== Regrets === | === Regrets === | ||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
==Topics== | ==Topics== | ||
* [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=technology.g-eclipse IP issues]: There are still two unresolved CQs (2886 JAXB - Impl Version: 2.1.6 (PB CQ2664), and 2887 Javax XML Bind Version: 2.1.0 (PB CQ2686)) that need to be resolved. | * [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=technology.g-eclipse IP issues]: There are still two unresolved CQs (2886 JAXB - Impl Version: 2.1.6 (PB CQ2664), and 2887 Javax XML Bind Version: 2.1.0 (PB CQ2686)) that need to be resolved. | ||
− | * Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them. | + | ** Wayne mentioned that there are other versions of the above libraries in the queue for Galileo that probably get IP approval earlier (higher priority because of Galileo participation) |
+ | ** We are looking for volunteers who can test the integration of those libraries with a higher version number. | ||
+ | * Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them. | ||
+ | ** Nothing new to report. | ||
* Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor components and restructure the packages slightly? | * Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor components and restructure the packages slightly? | ||
+ | ** Sounds like a good idea. Harald will summarize and start a vote on the mailing list. | ||
* Dependencies in Terminal View... | * Dependencies in Terminal View... | ||
+ | ** Ask Thomas about this. | ||
===Reminders=== | ===Reminders=== | ||
* TBD | * TBD | ||
== Additional Topics == | == Additional Topics == | ||
− | * | + | * Nicholas: JSDL Working Group - interested in parameter sweep support |
+ | ** our g-Eclipse implementation contains a very old schema and we should consider using the latest version of the schema | ||
+ | ** extracting the JSDL Editor into its own installable feature? | ||
+ | * David has some patches for the workflow editor that wait to be integrated | ||
==Action Items== | ==Action Items== | ||
− | * | + | * Test new JAXB implementations (who?) |
+ | * Harald: Mail to list about minimal AWS package. | ||
+ | * Harald: Ask Thomas about errors in Terminal View. | ||
'''Carry over items''' | '''Carry over items''' |
Latest revision as of 11:32, 24 February 2009
Meeting Title: | g-Eclipse Conference Call |
Date & Time: | Tuesday Feb 24, 2009 at 1500 UTC / 0700 SFO / 1000 NYC / 1500 London / 1600 Berlin |
Dial-in: | The conference calls are open to the public, and we invite everyone to participate. All you need is an Internet connection, the EVO software, and a EVO user id. You can get everything you need at evo.caltech.edu. |
Attendees
- Harald Kornmayer
- Markus Knauer
- Nicholas Loulloudes
- David Johnson
- Sylva Girtelschmid
Regrets
- TBD
Topics
- IP issues: There are still two unresolved CQs (2886 JAXB - Impl Version: 2.1.6 (PB CQ2664), and 2887 Javax XML Bind Version: 2.1.0 (PB CQ2686)) that need to be resolved.
- Wayne mentioned that there are other versions of the above libraries in the queue for Galileo that probably get IP approval earlier (higher priority because of Galileo participation)
- We are looking for volunteers who can test the integration of those libraries with a higher version number.
- Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them.
- Nothing new to report.
- Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor components and restructure the packages slightly?
- Sounds like a good idea. Harald will summarize and start a vote on the mailing list.
- Dependencies in Terminal View...
- Ask Thomas about this.
Reminders
- TBD
Additional Topics
- Nicholas: JSDL Working Group - interested in parameter sweep support
- our g-Eclipse implementation contains a very old schema and we should consider using the latest version of the schema
- extracting the JSDL Editor into its own installable feature?
- David has some patches for the workflow editor that wait to be integrated
Action Items
- Test new JAXB implementations (who?)
- Harald: Mail to list about minimal AWS package.
- Harald: Ask Thomas about errors in Terminal View.
Carry over items
- TBD