Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "G-Eclipse/Meeting Minutes/2009-02-24"

(Topics)
m (Action Items)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
* Markus Knauer
 
* Markus Knauer
 
* Nicholas Loulloudes
 
* Nicholas Loulloudes
 +
* David Johnson
 +
* Sylva Girtelschmid
  
 
=== Regrets ===
 
=== Regrets ===
Line 20: Line 22:
 
==Topics==
 
==Topics==
 
* [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=technology.g-eclipse IP issues]: There are still two unresolved CQs (2886 JAXB - Impl Version: 2.1.6 (PB CQ2664), and 2887 Javax XML Bind Version: 2.1.0 (PB CQ2686)) that need to be resolved.
 
* [http://www.eclipse.org/projects/ip_log.php?projectid=technology.g-eclipse IP issues]: There are still two unresolved CQs (2886 JAXB - Impl Version: 2.1.6 (PB CQ2664), and 2887 Javax XML Bind Version: 2.1.0 (PB CQ2686)) that need to be resolved.
* Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them.  
+
** Wayne mentioned that there are other versions of the above libraries in the queue for Galileo that probably get IP approval earlier (higher priority because of Galileo participation)
 +
** We are looking for volunteers who can test the integration of those libraries with a higher version number.
 +
* Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them.
 +
** Nothing new to report.
 
* Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor  components and restructure the packages slightly?
 
* Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor  components and restructure the packages slightly?
 +
** Sounds like a good idea. Harald will summarize and start a vote on the mailing list.
 
* Dependencies in Terminal View...
 
* Dependencies in Terminal View...
 +
** Ask Thomas about this.
 
===Reminders===
 
===Reminders===
 
* TBD
 
* TBD
  
 
== Additional Topics ==
 
== Additional Topics ==
* TBD
+
* Nicholas: JSDL Working Group - interested in parameter sweep support
 +
** our g-Eclipse implementation contains a very old schema and we should consider using the latest version of the schema
 +
** extracting the JSDL Editor into its own installable feature?
 +
* David has some patches for the workflow editor that wait to be integrated
  
 
==Action Items==
 
==Action Items==
* TBD
+
* Test new JAXB implementations (who?)
 +
* Harald: Mail to list about minimal AWS package.
 +
* Harald: Ask Thomas about errors in Terminal View.
  
 
'''Carry over items'''
 
'''Carry over items'''

Latest revision as of 11:32, 24 February 2009

Meeting Title: g-Eclipse Conference Call
Date & Time: Tuesday Feb 24, 2009 at 1500 UTC / 0700 SFO / 1000 NYC / 1500 London / 1600 Berlin
Dial-in: The conference calls are open to the public, and we invite everyone to participate. All you need is an Internet connection, the EVO software, and a EVO user id. You can get everything you need at evo.caltech.edu.

Attendees

  • Harald Kornmayer
  • Markus Knauer
  • Nicholas Loulloudes
  • David Johnson
  • Sylva Girtelschmid

Regrets

  • TBD

Topics

  • IP issues: There are still two unresolved CQs (2886 JAXB - Impl Version: 2.1.6 (PB CQ2664), and 2887 Javax XML Bind Version: 2.1.0 (PB CQ2686)) that need to be resolved.
    • Wayne mentioned that there are other versions of the above libraries in the queue for Galileo that probably get IP approval earlier (higher priority because of Galileo participation)
    • We are looking for volunteers who can test the integration of those libraries with a higher version number.
  • Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them.
    • Nothing new to report.
  • Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor components and restructure the packages slightly?
    • Sounds like a good idea. Harald will summarize and start a vote on the mailing list.
  • Dependencies in Terminal View...
    • Ask Thomas about this.

Reminders

  • TBD

Additional Topics

  • Nicholas: JSDL Working Group - interested in parameter sweep support
    • our g-Eclipse implementation contains a very old schema and we should consider using the latest version of the schema
    • extracting the JSDL Editor into its own installable feature?
  • David has some patches for the workflow editor that wait to be integrated

Action Items

  • Test new JAXB implementations (who?)
  • Harald: Mail to list about minimal AWS package.
  • Harald: Ask Thomas about errors in Terminal View.

Carry over items

  • TBD

Back to the top