Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "G-Eclipse/Meeting Minutes/2009-02-24"
< G-Eclipse | Meeting Minutes
(→Attendees) |
m (→Topics) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them. | * Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them. | ||
* Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor components and restructure the packages slightly? | * Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor components and restructure the packages slightly? | ||
| + | ** Sounds like a good idea. Harald will summarize and start a vote on the mailing list. | ||
* Dependencies in Terminal View... | * Dependencies in Terminal View... | ||
===Reminders=== | ===Reminders=== | ||
Revision as of 11:13, 24 February 2009
| Meeting Title: | g-Eclipse Conference Call |
| Date & Time: | Tuesday Feb 24, 2009 at 1500 UTC / 0700 SFO / 1000 NYC / 1500 London / 1600 Berlin |
| Dial-in: | The conference calls are open to the public, and we invite everyone to participate. All you need is an Internet connection, the EVO software, and a EVO user id. You can get everything you need at evo.caltech.edu. |
Attendees
- Harald Kornmayer
- Markus Knauer
- Nicholas Loulloudes
- David Johnson
Regrets
- TBD
Topics
- IP issues: There are still two unresolved CQs (2886 JAXB - Impl Version: 2.1.6 (PB CQ2664), and 2887 Javax XML Bind Version: 2.1.0 (PB CQ2686)) that need to be resolved.
- Data management performance. That should have the highest priority to be fixed. Mateusz promised to have a look to them.
- Dependencies and AWS: For the smallest AWS packaging, we don't need EMF in the core. Can/Should we reduce JSDL and workflow editor components and restructure the packages slightly?
- Sounds like a good idea. Harald will summarize and start a vote on the mailing list.
- Dependencies in Terminal View...
Reminders
- TBD
Additional Topics
- TBD
Action Items
- TBD
Carry over items
- TBD