Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Equinox Minutes - 20080129"
(New page: Topics: * Lazy-Start vs. Bundle-Activation-Policy: What do we tell people, and what do we do for Equinox bundles?) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ==Call-in Information== | |
+ | * Tuesdays from 2:05pm to 3:05pm (Eastern) | ||
+ | * '''613.287.8000''' or '''866.362.7064''', passcode '''892048#''' | ||
− | * Lazy-Start vs. Bundle-Activation-Policy | + | ==Attendees== |
+ | * John Arthorne | ||
+ | * Oleg Besedin | ||
+ | * Matt Flaherty | ||
+ | * DJ Houghton | ||
+ | * Simon Kaegi | ||
+ | * Tim Mok | ||
+ | * Andrew Niefer | ||
+ | * Pascal Rapicault | ||
+ | * Tom Watson | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Topics== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Lazy-Start vs. Bundle-Activation-Policy=== | ||
+ | What do we tell people, and what do we do for Equinox bundles? | ||
+ | * people have been asking what to do | ||
+ | * we need to provide direction | ||
+ | * if they switch, their bundles won't run in old (3.2) environments | ||
+ | * for instance SWT doesn't care what version or even if they are started | ||
+ | * people can use both headers if they want | ||
+ | * if you rely on something in the new Equinox, then use the new header | ||
+ | * currently a bug report open so they should add a native code header so they can run on other frameworks | ||
+ | * SWT actually looks for the JAR and does the extraction themselves | ||
+ | * will recommend that people just add in the new header and don't remove the old one | ||
+ | * PDE shouldn't give a warning (we asked them not to) | ||
+ | * they are adding a check to ensure that the headers are compatible | ||
+ | * tom to send note to eclipse-dev and cross-project-dev | ||
+ | * tom is looking at our bundles to update them so they run on other frameworks | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Ganymede CQs=== | ||
+ | Two days until Ganymede CQ deadline - are all CQs in for Equinox? | ||
+ | * security work is done | ||
+ | * prosyst is done | ||
+ | * jetty is done | ||
+ | * there is a bug open to make the CQ requirements for graduation process clearer | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Eclipse 3.4 M5=== | ||
+ | Coming soon... how do we look? | ||
+ | * andrew to talk to pde/ui to ensure p2 export stuff is good | ||
+ | * security | ||
+ | ** not much externally | ||
+ | ** doc review | ||
+ | ** working on kiosk login model | ||
+ | * p2 | ||
+ | ** good progress | ||
+ | ** some pde integration | ||
+ | ** provide installer | ||
+ | ** some tooling work | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===API freeze=== | ||
+ | * should we send a note to the community reminding them about the api freeze if there are bugs out there that have slipped through the cracks. | ||
+ | * will ask at arch meeting for pmc member to remind community of API freeze | ||
+ | * are people able to determine whether or not their fix will require API? | ||
+ | * we need to go through the bug reports | ||
+ | * can use api keyword for bugs which require new api | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===p2 Post-M5=== | ||
+ | * talk to pmc | ||
+ | * graduation review feb 13 | ||
+ | * pascal to prepare the slides (and call on others if necessary) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Package "uses" Clause=== | ||
+ | * tom sent note to mailing list | ||
+ | * can't do much for 3.4 | ||
+ | * might add some timeouts and when we hit them, choose best combination so far | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Bundle Format Header=== | ||
+ | * haven't made changes yet | ||
+ | * framework won't do anything with the header | ||
+ | * advice for provisioning and pde | ||
+ | * decided that Eclipse-BundleShape is good |
Latest revision as of 15:20, 29 January 2008
Contents
Call-in Information
- Tuesdays from 2:05pm to 3:05pm (Eastern)
- 613.287.8000 or 866.362.7064, passcode 892048#
Attendees
- John Arthorne
- Oleg Besedin
- Matt Flaherty
- DJ Houghton
- Simon Kaegi
- Tim Mok
- Andrew Niefer
- Pascal Rapicault
- Tom Watson
Topics
Lazy-Start vs. Bundle-Activation-Policy
What do we tell people, and what do we do for Equinox bundles?
- people have been asking what to do
- we need to provide direction
- if they switch, their bundles won't run in old (3.2) environments
- for instance SWT doesn't care what version or even if they are started
- people can use both headers if they want
- if you rely on something in the new Equinox, then use the new header
- currently a bug report open so they should add a native code header so they can run on other frameworks
- SWT actually looks for the JAR and does the extraction themselves
- will recommend that people just add in the new header and don't remove the old one
- PDE shouldn't give a warning (we asked them not to)
- they are adding a check to ensure that the headers are compatible
- tom to send note to eclipse-dev and cross-project-dev
- tom is looking at our bundles to update them so they run on other frameworks
Ganymede CQs
Two days until Ganymede CQ deadline - are all CQs in for Equinox?
- security work is done
- prosyst is done
- jetty is done
- there is a bug open to make the CQ requirements for graduation process clearer
Eclipse 3.4 M5
Coming soon... how do we look?
- andrew to talk to pde/ui to ensure p2 export stuff is good
- security
- not much externally
- doc review
- working on kiosk login model
- p2
- good progress
- some pde integration
- provide installer
- some tooling work
API freeze
- should we send a note to the community reminding them about the api freeze if there are bugs out there that have slipped through the cracks.
- will ask at arch meeting for pmc member to remind community of API freeze
- are people able to determine whether or not their fix will require API?
- we need to go through the bug reports
- can use api keyword for bugs which require new api
p2 Post-M5
- talk to pmc
- graduation review feb 13
- pascal to prepare the slides (and call on others if necessary)
Package "uses" Clause
- tom sent note to mailing list
- can't do much for 3.4
- might add some timeouts and when we hit them, choose best combination so far
Bundle Format Header
- haven't made changes yet
- framework won't do anything with the header
- advice for provisioning and pde
- decided that Eclipse-BundleShape is good