Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "Equinox/Meeting Minutes/20100914"
< Equinox | Meeting Minutes
(New page: = Attendees = * Jeff = Agenda = * 3.6.1 status * 3.7 M2 testing (Equinox resolver topics) * merging equinox and p2 calls = Minutes =) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Jeff | * Jeff | ||
| + | * DJ | ||
| + | * John | ||
| + | * Pascal | ||
| + | * Simon | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
| Line 8: | Line 12: | ||
* 3.7 M2 testing (Equinox resolver topics) | * 3.7 M2 testing (Equinox resolver topics) | ||
* merging equinox and p2 calls | * merging equinox and p2 calls | ||
| + | * Server side stuff | ||
| + | * Equinox security | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 3.6.1 == | ||
| + | * we are good to go | ||
| + | * still some work to do with the EPP folks SR1 | ||
| + | * John will cast the vote | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 3.7 M2 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | == Merging Equinox and p2 calls == | ||
| + | * General consensus that merging would be good | ||
| + | * There should be some effort to contain deep technical discussions to the end of the call or other calls | ||
| + | * The question of day / time comes up. | ||
| + | * Suggesting sticking to afternoon ET but need to poll the Europeans to see if that is too late for them | ||
| + | * Pascal to open a poll with various time slots | ||
| + | * We'll make a decision in this call next week | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Server side == | ||
| + | * Help guide Angelo Zerr in his server side tutorial blog series | ||
| + | * Look at the RAP GSoC work and see if there is something that can be contributed to PDE | ||
| + | * Look again at working with the WTP folks on tooling | ||
| + | * We should try to get more people involved | ||
| + | * the lack of tests is actually an impediment to getting more people on board because it is hard to assess contributions | ||
| + | * There may be some challenges testing the servlet bridge on various app servers | ||
| + | * Look at what the Jetty folks do for testing (see dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/rt/org.eclipse.jetty/jetty/trunk/tests) | ||
| + | * perhaps look at HTTPUnit | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Equinox security == | ||
| + | * what is the status here. | ||
| + | * Matt F has not been around lately but there does not seem to be much activity. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:39, 14 September 2010
Contents
Attendees
- Jeff
- DJ
- John
- Pascal
- Simon
Agenda
- 3.6.1 status
- 3.7 M2 testing (Equinox resolver topics)
- merging equinox and p2 calls
- Server side stuff
- Equinox security
Minutes
3.6.1
- we are good to go
- still some work to do with the EPP folks SR1
- John will cast the vote
3.7 M2
Merging Equinox and p2 calls
- General consensus that merging would be good
- There should be some effort to contain deep technical discussions to the end of the call or other calls
- The question of day / time comes up.
- Suggesting sticking to afternoon ET but need to poll the Europeans to see if that is too late for them
- Pascal to open a poll with various time slots
- We'll make a decision in this call next week
Server side
- Help guide Angelo Zerr in his server side tutorial blog series
- Look at the RAP GSoC work and see if there is something that can be contributed to PDE
- Look again at working with the WTP folks on tooling
- We should try to get more people involved
- the lack of tests is actually an impediment to getting more people on board because it is hard to assess contributions
- There may be some challenges testing the servlet bridge on various app servers
- Look at what the Jetty folks do for testing (see dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/rt/org.eclipse.jetty/jetty/trunk/tests)
- perhaps look at HTTPUnit
Equinox security
- what is the status here.
- Matt F has not been around lately but there does not seem to be much activity.