Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "EmfIndex Comparison"
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*How to build a convinient Query API on top of the low level API<br> | *How to build a convinient Query API on top of the low level API<br> | ||
− | = Performance = | + | = Performance = |
+ | |||
+ | == Indexing Time == | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| width="200" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | | 1000 | ||
+ | | 2000 | ||
+ | | 3000 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | SAP | ||
+ | | 0,3 | ||
+ | | 0,45 | ||
+ | | 0,65 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Itemis | ||
+ | | 1,4 | ||
+ | | 2,2 | ||
+ | | 3,3 | ||
+ | |} |
Revision as of 03:30, 2 September 2009
This page is intended to compare the two index implementations form different viewpoints such as
- API
- Performance
- Memory Consumption
- How to build a convinient Query API on top of the low level API
Performance
Indexing Time
1000 | 2000 | 3000 | |
SAP | 0,3 | 0,45 | 0,65 |
Itemis | 1,4 | 2,2 | 3,3 |