Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "EPP/Obsolete/Version Proposal"

< EPP
(Created page with "The Eclipse simultaneous release uses a name based scheme for each new train. While it's great to have a name for a train, the major concern is that it's not easy for people t...")
 
(Proposals)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
{|
 
{|
!Train
+
!Train Names
!Year of Train
+
!Year
!Simplified Year of Train
+
!Simplified Year
!Year.Month of actual Release (Ubuntu like)
+
!Year.Month
 
|-
 
|-
|continue to use for planning and train purposes
+
|<small>continue to use for planning and train purposes</small>
|the year of the train, add counters as necessary
+
|<small>the year of the train, add counters as necessary</small>
|simplified year of the train (2-digits only), counter always added, starting with 0
+
|<small>simplified year of the train (2-digits only), counter always added, starting with 0</small>
|year.month of the actual release
+
|<small>year.month of the actual release (similar to what Ubuntu does)</small>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|Neon
 
|Neon

Revision as of 05:13, 29 April 2016

The Eclipse simultaneous release uses a name based scheme for each new train. While it's great to have a name for a train, the major concern is that it's not easy for people to identify "what is current".

Discussions:


Proposals

Train Names Year Simplified Year Year.Month
continue to use for planning and train purposes the year of the train, add counters as necessary simplified year of the train (2-digits only), counter always added, starting with 0 year.month of the actual release (similar to what Ubuntu does)
Neon 2016 16.0 2016.06
Neon.1 2016.1 16.1 2016.10
Neon.2 2016.2 16.2 2017.02
Oxygen 2017 17.0 2017.06

Back to the top