Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

EMIWG/MembersCall-12-February-2009

< EMIWG
Revision as of 18:35, 6 February 2009 by Christian.motorola.com (Talk | contribs) (Dial-in Info)

Shortcuts
Home
Meetings
Mail Archive
Edit this menu

Meeting Logistics

Time

Berlin, Stockholm, Salzburg 5:00:00 PM UTC+1 hours
Helsinki (Finland) 6:00:00 PM UTC+2 hours
London (UK) 4:00:00 PM UTC+0 hour
San Francisco (USA. - California) 8:00:00 AM UTC-8 hours
Sao Paulo (Brazil - São Paulo) 2:00:00 PM UTC-2 hours

Click here for Complete Listing of World Clock Timezones.

Dial-in Info

Toll free:

  • US & Canada: 1877 825 8522
  • UK: 0808 234 7914
  • Brazil: 0800 891 6634
  • Finland: 0800 11 6433
  • Sweden: 020 79 3867 or 020 088 4643
  • More international call-in Numbers, see: EMIWG/InternationalDialInNumbers

International Toll Number: US: +1 702 495 1500

Passcode: 9190565826

Attendees (Preliminary)

  • Motorola
  • Nokia
  • Craig Setera
  • RIM
  • Sony Ericsson
  • Genuitec


Proposed Agenda

Roll Call and Review of the Agenda (5 Minutes)

(anyone have some last minute Agenda items)

Roadmap

Update from the technical work stream, Christian

Product

Update on MADK from Christian

Marketing

Proposals for Names (MADK, MIWG)

  • need to get resolution before Press Release
  • Ian to set deadline ?


Proposals for funding joint marketing initiatives

Mobile Connect (March 10-13, Santa Clara): Any members available to cover event?

Press Release timeframe?

Evangelist:

  • Define Role
    • Internal
    • External


Best Practices

Should we have a EMIWG Micro Site

  • Documentation for MADK
    • How to install/use tool
    • How to get started developing apps
  • Sample Code
  • Discussion Board
  • Possible runtime library repository for MTJ?

Should we have MADK Test Suites

  • Test MADK
  • Test SDK compliance

Should we have MADK "Plugin Provider" status

Back to the top