Skip to main content
Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "EMF Compare FAQ"

(Is EMF Compare, as EMF, able to run outside of Eclipse ?)
(Is EMF Compare, as EMF, able to run outside of Eclipse ?)
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
====Is EMF Compare, as EMF, able to run outside of Eclipse ? ====
 
====Is EMF Compare, as EMF, able to run outside of Eclipse ? ====
'''Q''' : Is EMF Compare able to compare "in-memory" objects, and can it be run without Eclispe ?
+
'''Q''' : Is EMF Compare able to compare "in-memory" objects, and can it be run without Eclipse ?
  
 
'''A''': Yes, [http://wiki.eclipse.org/images/2/23/Org.eclipse.emf.compare.example.standalone-I200710230727.zip here] is a Java project example doing just that.
 
'''A''': Yes, [http://wiki.eclipse.org/images/2/23/Org.eclipse.emf.compare.example.standalone-I200710230727.zip here] is a Java project example doing just that.

Revision as of 09:43, 24 October 2007


Users

My model is compared as a text-file, how can EMF compare know what file it should handle ?

Q : My model is compared as a text-file, how can EMF compare know what file it should handle ?

A : EMF compare uses a content-type to know if it should be started or not. By default this content-type is composed of *.ecore and *.uml file but you may add your own extension using the Preferences view / Global / Content-types and adding your file extension in the "Model File" content-type.

EMFComparePreferences-content-type.png

How to force text comparison?

Q : uml, ecore and emfdiff models are "locked" as model files in the aforementioned "Model File" content-type. I want to compare two uml files as text, is there a way to do so?

A : You can force text comparison of those "locked" model files by adding their extension to the "text" content type in the same way as what is explained above.

Is EMF Compare compatible with the JDK 1.4?

Q : Will EMF Compare work with JDK 1.4?

A : EMF Compare is built against JDK 1.5 and makes use of the features it introduced such as foreach and generics. It is therefore incompatible with a JDK < 1.5.

Developpers

How can I programatically add my model file extension in EMF Compare so that it is called automatically ?

Q : How can I programatically add my model file extension in EMF Compare so that it is called automatically ?

A : Using the "Model File" content-type defined with EMF Compare, here is a sample from a plugin.xml:

 <extension
        point="org.eclipse.core.contenttype.contentTypes">
     <file-association
           content-type="org.eclipse.emf.compare.ui.contenttype.ModelContentType"
           file-extensions="uml13"
           file-names="*"/>
  </extension>

Is EMF Compare, as EMF, able to run outside of Eclipse ?

Q : Is EMF Compare able to compare "in-memory" objects, and can it be run without Eclipse ?

A: Yes, here is a Java project example doing just that.

What kind of "strategies" use EMF compare ?

Q : What kind of "strategies" use EMF compare ? On which research work is it based ?

A : The emf compare generic engine is based on several research work and on experimentations. The paper being the most "near" the emf compare behavior is probably "UMLDiff: An Algorithm for Object-OrientedDesign Differencing" by Zhenchang Xing and Eleni Stroulia. Other reseach work have been used and a lot of them use the same kind of general behavior: A comparison in 2 phases, the first being the matching phase and the second the differencing phase. The matching is done computing comparison metrics and getting an "overall" rank of matching for two nodes while browsing both versions of the model. These metrics may change considering the research work, here in the generic engine we use 4 metrics :

  • type similarity : analysing the metamodel element
  • name similarity : looking for an attribute which have chances to be the

name and comparing it

  • value similarity : analysing the whole attributes values
  • relations similarity : using the relations the element has with others.

Using these 4 metrics the comparison engine provide good correctness (most especially comparing models from DSM/DSL's metamodels) and efficiency when comparing big models (~=100 000 elements).

Once the matching phase is done, the matching model is browsed by the differencing engine computing "added", "deleted" or updated elements from that. If you save a comparison as an emfdiff model you'll be able to browse the match and diff model and you'll get the similarity ranking for each couple of elements.

We're open to suggestion to enhance this generic behavior but we are also open to other methods : we want this component to be a testbed for other algorithms and comparison techniques, any Eclipse plugin may contribute its own matching and differencing engine for generic or specific purpose and it would be quite interesting to compare the results from different engines on different models.

These strategies will probably evolve in the next releases (see following question).

What evolution should we expect on the global EMF compare strategies ?

Q : What evolution should we expect on the global EMF compare strategies ?

A : We are trying to get better results with generic comparison algorithm through other methods coming from the research world. An initiative about model transformation/weaving and comparison is taking place in Europe an you may expect that the EMF compare implementation will evolve toward these works.

Model Transformation initiative

Back to the top