Notice: This Wiki is now read only and edits are no longer possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
Difference between revisions of "E4/Meeting Minutes/Status 20130905"
< E4 | Meeting Minutes
(→Minutes) |
(→Minutes) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Investigating replacement of SAC CSS parser with different parsers | * Investigating replacement of SAC CSS parser with different parsers | ||
* Working on enabling use of some IDE views like navigator in an e4 RCP app | * Working on enabling use of some IDE views like navigator in an e4 RCP app | ||
+ | * e4 Scripting | ||
+ | ** There is a group looking at reviving scripting support in Eclipse | ||
+ | ** e4 is a potential initial home for the investigation | ||
+ | ** We should let them know about the existing e4 scripting work that has been done already | ||
* Jface generics | * Jface generics | ||
** work has moved into a branch | ** work has moved into a branch |
Revision as of 11:06, 5 September 2013
Attendees
- Brian
- Dani
- Daniel
- Paul
- John
Minutes
- We are done with Kepler SR1
- Respin was needed last night due to build problems
- Revisiting window rendering workflow to simplify it
- Looking at recent report of performance problem in CTabFolder in app with large number of tabs
- Touching bundles to fix inner jar signing problems - need to make sure we sign what we used to sign
- Investigating replacement of SAC CSS parser with different parsers
- Working on enabling use of some IDE views like navigator in an e4 RCP app
- e4 Scripting
- There is a group looking at reviving scripting support in Eclipse
- e4 is a potential initial home for the investigation
- We should let them know about the existing e4 scripting work that has been done already
- Jface generics
- work has moved into a branch
- need to ensure we have a functionally complete subset generified, and at least some concrete viewers ported over to validate the approach
- Aiming for completion in M3
- Forking JFace
- Could enable other kinds of investigation
- Would be hard to co-exist and adopt
- Not clear if it is needed for generics alone
- JFace already makes fairly extensive use of collection-based methods alongside array-based methods