Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.
CardSync Closed Design Issues
Revision as of 22:16, 12 July 2009 by Ptrevithick.gmail.com (Talk | contribs) (New page: {{#eclipseproject:technology.higgins|eclipse_custom_style.css}} right ==== Should we use WebDAV? ==== Reasons For: * reduces our development effort as ...)
{{#eclipseproject:technology.higgins|eclipse_custom_style.css}}
Should we use WebDAV?
Reasons For:
- reduces our development effort as this protocol is designed for resource synchronization. And that's what we're doing
- mature, widely supported. Being used in new projects such as Mozilla Weave.
Reasons Against:
- Not RESTful. WebDAV extends the HTTP verb set. As such is deprecated by the W3C.
- Can interfere with web cache architectures
Decision:
- We will NOT use WebDAV
Should we use Google protocol buffers?
Reasons For:
- Mature
- High performance
- Good libraries in both C++ and Java
Reasons Against:
- Question: Might using protobuf reduce the likelyhood of the CardSpace team collaborating with us and potentially using the CardSync Web App? <-- an outcome that would increase interoperability in the industry
Decision:
- We will NOT use Google protocol buffers