Skip to main content

Notice: this Wiki will be going read only early in 2024 and edits will no longer be possible. Please see: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/helpdesk/-/wikis/Wiki-shutdown-plan for the plan.

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "COSMOSDataCollectionMeeting20071218"

(New page: == Agenda == * Status updates and agenda changes * Review action items * Today's agenda is open for any priority business == Attendees == * Don Ebright * Joel Hawkins * Paul Stratton ...)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
* Status updates and agenda changes   
 
* Status updates and agenda changes   
 
* Review action items
 
* Review action items
* Today's agenda is open for any priority business
+
* I8 status
 +
* QA criteria
 +
 
  
 
== Attendees ==
 
== Attendees ==
  
 
* Don Ebright  
 
* Don Ebright  
 +
* Jimmy Mohsin
 
* Joel Hawkins
 
* Joel Hawkins
* Paul Stratton
 
* Martin Simmonds
 
* Shivashankari N. (Shivvy)
 
 
* John Todd (JT)
 
* John Todd (JT)
* Mark Weitzel
+
* Martin Simmonds
 
* Jack Devine
 
* Jack Devine
 +
* Paul Stratton
 
* Hubert Leung
 
* Hubert Leung
* Bill Muldoon
+
* Mark Weitzel
  
 
== Discussion ==
 
== Discussion ==
  
* We discussed whether and how to deliver a build environment that a consumer can use to build COSMOS outside the Eclipse build infrastructure.  We also need to facilitate the ability for an adopter to assemble a stable configuration without the depencency problems that occur when we try to import the COSMOS frameworks into an existing Eclipse IDE.
+
* Jack reported that ER 208585 is not finished due to changes required to integrate with the service group changes introduced in 204921.  We discussed how to address this generic issue in i9.  We agreed that ERs with dependencies should be scheduled for the earlier parts of the iteration to avoid integration difficulties when trying to close an iteration.
  
* Joel discussed some possible features that could fit into his work on implementing the COSMOS common exception framework and how these exceptions could be used with or without creating a WEF event.  Joel suggested that we might want to allow the addition of an "originator" that can be used to identify the EPR or other identity of the exception originator.  We agreed to discuss this further on this Thursday's architecture call.  We also discussed how to implement the non-OSGI runtime deployment.
+
* Jimmy requested feedback for the i9 test plan and the security and internationalization plans.
  
* Bill Muldoon asked about feature 209987.  We discussed implementing a wrapper over the Aperi Derby database in i9 to implement this feature.  It is currently targeted to i8.
+
* Mark reminded the group that we intend to review i9 use cases tomorrow.
  
* The next two Tuesdays are holidays.  We decided to skip the week between the two holidays and hold a joint Data Collection / Architecture meeting on Wednesday January 2.  Don will be on vacation the following week and Mark volunteered to host the January 8 DC call.
+
* Due to the backlog of work in closing out i8 and preparing for i9, we agreed to adjourn early.
  
 
== Action Items ==
 
== Action Items ==
  
 
* None
 
* None

Revision as of 13:04, 15 January 2008

Agenda

  • Status updates and agenda changes
  • Review action items
  • I8 status
  • QA criteria


Attendees

  • Don Ebright
  • Jimmy Mohsin
  • Joel Hawkins
  • John Todd (JT)
  • Martin Simmonds
  • Jack Devine
  • Paul Stratton
  • Hubert Leung
  • Mark Weitzel

Discussion

  • Jack reported that ER 208585 is not finished due to changes required to integrate with the service group changes introduced in 204921. We discussed how to address this generic issue in i9. We agreed that ERs with dependencies should be scheduled for the earlier parts of the iteration to avoid integration difficulties when trying to close an iteration.
  • Jimmy requested feedback for the i9 test plan and the security and internationalization plans.
  • Mark reminded the group that we intend to review i9 use cases tomorrow.
  • Due to the backlog of work in closing out i8 and preparing for i9, we agreed to adjourn early.

Action Items

  • None

Back to the top